Groups
Groups
Sign in
Groups
Groups
Edge Test Tool (ETT)
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
C-CDA USCDI V4 Validator: Average Blood Pressure Invariant Violation
47 views
Skip to first unread message
Chara McMunn
unread,
Jan 20, 2026, 10:14:27 AM
Jan 20
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Edge Test Tool (ETT)
Validating either example (
https://hl7.org/cda/us/ccda/4.0.0/StructureDefinition-AverageBloodPressureOrganizer.html
) or attached vital-sign-modiified.xml fails validation using the C-CDA USCDI V4 Validator (
https://site.healthit.gov/c-cda/uscdi-v4
).
Result Description: The 'AverageBloodPressureOrganizerAverageBloodPressureOrganizerSystolicBloodPressureMeanObservation' invariant is violated on
XPath: /ClinicalDocument/component/structuredBody/component[13]/section/entry[2]/organizer
AverageBloodPressureValidationResults.pdf
vital-sign-modified.xml
nagesh.bashyam (Dragon)
unread,
Jan 20, 2026, 11:54:09 AM
Jan 20
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Edge Test Tool (ETT)
Will look into the issue and get back soon.
Chara McMunn
unread,
Jan 28, 2026, 8:43:46 AM (11 days ago)
Jan 28
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Edge Test Tool (ETT)
Checking in for update on this issue.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages