SDOH Planned Procedure Validator Warning
Jyothi Yella
Hi Team,
We are seeing a validator warning stating that Planned Procedure codes may be selected from CPT-4 or ICD10-PCS. This is an informational rule only (MAY, not SHALL). As per the template, SNOMED CT is allowed, and CPT/HCPCS are also optional. We have observed that even when CPT/HCPCS codes are provided, the same warning continues to appear.
Therefore, we intend to proceed with SNOMED-based SDOH Planned Procedures and treat this as expected validator behavior.
<!-- ** SDOH Intervention ** -->
<entry>
<procedure moodCode="RQO" classCode="PROC">
<!-- **Planned Procedure template ** -->
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.41" />
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.41" extension="2014-06-09" />
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.41" extension="2022-06-01" />
<!-- **Planned Procedure template ** -->
<id root="9a6d1bac-17d3-4195-89c4-1121bc809b5a" />
<code code="467771000124109" displayName="Assistance with application for food pantry program (procedure)" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.96" codeSystemName="SNOMEDCT" />
<statusCode code="active" />
<effectiveTime value="20150623" />
<author>
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.119" />
<time value="20251224132542+0530" />
<assignedAuthor>
<id extension="999999999" root="2.16.840.1.113883.4.6" />
<code code="207Q00000X" displayName="Family Practice" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.101" codeSystemName="Health Care Provider Taxonomy" />
<addr use="HP">
<streetAddressLine>2472 Rocky place</streetAddressLine>
<city>Beaverton</city>
<state>OR</state>
<postalCode>970060000</postalCode>
<country>USA</country>
</addr>
<telecom use="WP" value="tel:+1(555)-555-1002" />
<assignedPerson>
<name>
<prefix>Dr.</prefix>
<given>ALBERT</given>
<family>DAVIS</family>
</name>
</assignedPerson>
<representedOrganization>
<id root="2.16.840.1.113883.19.5" />
<name>Neighborhood Physicians Practice</name>
</representedOrganization>
</assignedAuthor>
</author>
</procedure>
</entry>
</section>
</component>
Please let us know if this approach is acceptable.
Regards,
Joe
Jyothi Yella
Hi Team,
I’m following up on my previous (above) email regarding the validator warnings for SDOH Planned Procedures.
As noted previously, we have confirmed that our use of SNOMED CT aligns with the template requirements. Since the warning is informational ("MAY") and persists even when CPT/HCPCS codes are present, we plan to proceed with the current SNOMED-based approach.
If there are any concerns with this direction, please let us know.
Regards,
Joe
br...@waveoneassociates.com
Jyothi Yella
Thank you for confirming, but CCDA Validator is showing 'Warning' message is that acceptable ??
