Hi, Diana,
Check VSAC for the list of allowed codes:
https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/valueset/2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.9/expansion
Best,
Brett
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Edge Test Tool (ETT)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
edge-test-too...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
edge-te...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/edge-test-tool/edfc460a-4a0b-41d4-b597-d3116b6d278e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Sorry Diana, I sent you the substances!
See this one for reactions: https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/valueset/2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.3221.7.4/expansion
I don’t see hives present either, let me do some digging.
Best,
Brett
From: edge-te...@googlegroups.com [mailto:edge-te...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Diana S
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 2:56 PM
To: Edge Test Tool (ETT) <edge-te...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Allergy reaction SNOMED value set
Thanks Brett!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Edge Test Tool (ETT)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
edge-test-too...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
edge-te...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/edge-test-tool/ceb1a913-c605-44c3-996b-52b6086071ec%40googlegroups.com.
Good morning Diana,
I hope you had a nice weekend.
After a several emails over the weekend it appears something isn’t quite right in VSAC. 247472004 is valid.
The expansion version of 20170504 only includes 2,668 concepts, when it should be over 110k!
Update the expansion version to (2017-06-09) for the allowed terms:
The Validator needs to be updated with this full set.
Best,
Brett
From: edge-te...@googlegroups.com [mailto:edge-te...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Diana S
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 2:56 PM
To: Edge Test Tool (ETT) <edge-te...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Allergy reaction SNOMED value set
Thanks Brett!
--
To post to this group, send email to edge-t...@googlegroups.com.
Hi, Diana,
I certainly hope not!
There are terminology vendors who support subsets, and some EHRs build ‘most frequent’ to avoid a full 110k search every time.
Best,
Brett
From: edge-te...@googlegroups.com [mailto:edge-te...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Diana S
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:18 AM
To: Edge Test Tool (ETT) <edge-te...@googlegroups.com>
Cc: dianas...@gmail.com; nagesh....@drajer.com
Subject: Re: Allergy reaction SNOMED value set
Thanks Brett!
Also, does this mean there still isn't a smaller subset of the SNOMED problem value set that just represents allergy reactions?
Do EHRs hand select out of the 110K for those?
Thanks again for chasing this one down!
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-4, Brett Marquard wrote:
Good morning Diana,
I hope you had a nice weekend.
After a several emails over the weekend it appears something isn’t quite right in VSAC. 247472004 is valid.
The expansion version of 20170504 only includes 2,668 concepts, when it should be over 110k!
Update the expansion version to (2017-06-09) for the allowed terms:
To post to this group, send email to
edge-te...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/edge-test-tool/d9899ed2-4edb-4fd2-9e1d-b1fbf0047da8%40googlegroups.com.
Hi, Diana,
I am cc’ing a few folks from HL7 patient care that presented on ‘most common allergens’
I haven’t received a request to code "questionable" or "unspecified” previously.
Dr. Leftwhich – Are those appropriate codes for a reaction?
To post to this group, send email to
edge-te...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/edge-test-tool/7fc21330-6a78-42b2-8536-58d80e1742cb%40googlegroups.com.
Hi, Rob,
Before giving guidance on ‘questionable’ and ‘unspecified’, I was hoping Russ could confirm those are clinically valid…and provide input on how patient care approached in FHIR.
Best,
Brett
From: Robert McClure MD [mailto:rmcc...@mdpartners.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:24 PM
To: Russ Leftwich <rl...@pobox.com>; Brett Marquard <br...@riverrockassociates.com>
Cc: Diana S <dianas...@gmail.com>; Edge Test Tool (ETT) <edge-te...@googlegroups.com>; nagesh....@drajer.com; David Parker <David....@definedit.com>
Subject: Re: Allergy reaction SNOMED value set
Folks,
I can’t see the screenshot so don’t know what that communicates. The “Wheal” issues is moot since that concept is in the value set.
Perhaps I’m missing something but I think this latest email was not about an actual physical reaction, but how to incorporate the following very different things:
Russ should answer the first issue.
The second, in this specific case, should be communicated using an infamous V3 NULL flavor. I’d assume UNK. Brett, that one should be on your list of “how to do” I think.
. . .
Consultant to ONC / NLM on terminology
All content represents my view only
Robert McClure MD : 303.926.6771 : rmcc...@mdpartners.com
On Jul 17, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Russ Leftwich <cmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
I will defer to Rob on the value set question, although that particular SCT code of "wheal" is indeed not specific for allergy, might or might not be a manifestation of an allergy.
Russ
<image001.jpg>