Can China pay Russia to preserve Siberia’s forests, preventing permafrost meltdown and methane bombs?
All we need is wisdom on all sides for good luck to our planet!
From:
Anastassia Makarieva <bioticre...@substack.com>
Date: Saturday, November 8, 2025 at 06:48
To: Tom Goreau <gor...@globalcoral.org>
Subject: Who Will Lead the Global Ecocentrism Movement?
A leaked secret letter to Russian decision-makers, translated and published here with my comments for its perceived potential to energize global leaders toward a nobler task.
͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Who Will Lead the Global Ecocentrism Movement?A leaked secret letter to Russian decision-makers, translated and published here with my comments for its perceived potential to energize global leaders toward a nobler task.
Preserving Wild Nature as Russia’s National Strategy in the Emerging Planetary Architecture
According to
systems
analysts [1] advising U.S. intelligence agencies, humanity is currently undergoing four bifurcations, becoming almost irreversibly divided into: The fourth bifurcation separates the technocentrists—those who believe that all problems of civilization can be solved within the framework of technological progress, which has historically disregarded natural ecosystems—from the ecocentrists, who have realized that the complexity of living nature far exceeds that of modern civilization, and that further development of civilization, including scientific and technological progress, along the path of biospheric destruction is impossible. Ecocentrism, which acknowledges the complexity of living systems, implies a higher level of organization of the scientific and technological process than technocentrism [2]. Unlike ordered inanimate objects, living systems possess such a degree of complexity that their spontaneous emergence is impossible; they can appear only as copies of previously existing living forms. This replication of life forms has continued on Earth without interruption for four billion years. Life, therefore, is a process whose organizational complexity is sufficient to maintain the conditions necessary for its own continuation. The complexity of life reflects the complexity of the task of sustaining an environment suitable for living. From these premises follows an unambiguous conclusion: the destruction of natural ecosystems leads to the irreversible destabilization of the environment and climate — a process that cannot be prevented or corrected by technological means. It is no coincidence that, despite all the achievements of scientific and technological progress, our success in maintaining conditions suitable for life remains practically non-existent: freshwater reserves are being depleted, soils are degrading, food quality is declining, and the composition of the atmosphere is moving beyond the range favorable for normal human cognitive functioning [3]. [That “no coincidence” captures the essential difference between technocentrists and ecocentrists. The former still believe that sufficient investment in the right technologies will eventually resolve the environmental crisis, even as natural ecosystems remain neglected and left to degrade on the margins of civilization’s highway of progress. The latter have realized that an environment suitable for life cannot exist without life-supporting ecosystems — it is prohibited by the laws of nature, just as perpetual motion machines are. For ecocentrists, the failure of Biosphere-2 is as inevitable and instructive as the failure to build another perpetuum mobile. Technocentrists would simply try again. — AM]. Appreciating the complexity of living systems is difficult without direct contact with wild nature. In the modern urbanized civilization, in many regions, such contact, and, consequently, ecocentrism, has become the privilege of a small minority who have reached the higher levels of Maslow’s pyramid [4]. In Russia, which has preserved uniquely extensive areas of wild nature and traditions of personal interaction with the natural world through its dacha culture, ecocentrism is implicitly present in the consciousness and life philosophy of a large part of the population. This circumstance gives the country, in principle, the capacity to choose unconventional and hardly predictable—at least for technocentrists—paths of development in an increasingly chaotic world. It was in Russia that the interdisciplinary concept of biotic regulation of the environment [5] was developed, which makes it possible to quantitatively assess the stabilizing impact of natural ecosystems on the environment and climate. The principal distinguishing feature of natural ecosystems is their capacity for self-recovery following disturbances that do not exceed the threshold of stability. [The biotic pump concept, which describes the biotic regulation of the continental water cycle, is currently being advanced through a Brazilian–Russian collaboration — a symbolic partnership between the planetary regions that hold the largest share of intact ecosystems. (This is not to overlook other important international efforts and collaborators who have been working on this topic.) — AM] Dacha of Prof. Victor Gorshkov, author of the concept of biotic regulation of the environment The preservation of Russia’s wild nature as a national strategy addresses the following objectives: 1. Stabilization of climate and environment on a Eurasian scale, including the water cycle and atmospheric moisture transport. 2. Creation of a new international image — that of a global leader and hub of ecocentrism — with the potential to attract significant resources from ecocentrists worldwide [6]. 3. Counteracting destructive efforts at Russia’s dehumanization through global leadership in the noble cause of conserving natural ecosystems. 4. Assisting China in developing and implementing the principles of an eco-civilization. Since China’s natural ecosystems have been almost completely destroyed, the country has found itself trapped in technocentrism. However, the escalating environmental degradation is forcing China to search for new paths for progress. [It is also worth noting that a substantial part of the Chinese population continues to work the land as peasants, thereby maintaining at least minimal contact with life-support systems — in contrast to many other developed countries, where mechanized agriculture has reduced the number of farmers to a negligible proportion, further debilitating ecocentric thinking. — AM] Russian natural forests play a key role in the continental transport of atmospheric moisture [7], providing a significant share of its inflow to China, Central Asia, and other regions [8]. Logging of natural forests in Russia by Chinese businesses destabilizes these flows and contributes to increasing aridity and water cycle instabilities across vast areas of Eurasia, including China itself, where the remaining forests are already under strict protection. Russia urgently needs to introduce a similar moratorium on the exploitation of natural forests north of 58° N latitude. [Frankly, this is in the interest of all people on Earth, even if they have not yet come to that realization. — AM] Strategic environmental cooperation with international partners, including dialogue at the level of heads of state, could provide the necessary funding to withdraw Russia’s intact forests entirely from economic use and preserve them for future generations as a natural heritage of global significance [9].
Notes You're currently a free subscriber to Biotic Regulation and Biotic Pump. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
© 2025 Anastassia Makarieva |
--
View this message at https://groups.google.com/a/googlegroups.com/d/msg/ecorestoration-alliance/topic-id/message-id
Group emails flooding your inbox? Click here: https://groups.google.com/g/ecorestoration-alliance/settings#email
Our website is at http://EcorestorationAlliance.org/
Our calendar is at https://tinyurl.com/EcoResCalendar
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EcoRestoration Alliance" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ecorestoration-al...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ecorestoration-alliance/BY3PR13MB4994C7402A7B90638F877F18DDC0A%40BY3PR13MB4994.namprd13.prod.outlook.com.