Brussels Under Financed ( Gemini AI )

[Dante Monson]

When people compare #Brussels Vs #Birmingham 

https://auvio.rtbf.be/media/journal-televise-sujet-par-sujet-birmingham-sous-tutelle-3411447

It is a mistake to consider that Brussels needs to be put under tutelle. It is a political coup d'État. It requires legal action.

#Gaslighting from Belgian Nationalistic Flemish parties and right wing about the root cause of the under financing of the Region of Brussels: 

Your assertion regarding the economic situation of Brussels and its comparison to Birmingham appears to be largely accurate based on recent economic analyses, particularly from the National Bank of Belgium (NBB).

🇧🇪 Brussels: An Under-Financed Economic Engine

The information confirms the core of your claim about Brussels' economic contribution and financing.

 * Significant Economic Output and Trade Surplus: A study by the National Bank of Belgium (NBB) indicates that the Brussels-Capital Region generates a large trade surplus, with figures reported around €28.6 billion annually. This highlights its role as a major economic powerhouse for the country.

 * Net Contributor Despite Deficit: Despite having an annual budget deficit (which reached 25.4% of its revenue in 2024, far higher than the other regions), Brussels is a net contributor to interregional solidarity (the system of financial transfers between regions).

   * The NBB calculated that if interregional solidarity were to disappear, Brussels would have an annual surplus of €6.2 billion, indicating that the capital generates wealth that is subsequently transferred.

   * This is partly due to the large outflow of income: a significant amount of the wealth generated in Brussels, including around €20 billion in wages, is paid to commuters who live in Flanders and Wallonia and is thus taxed and spent outside the region.

 * Context of Under-financing: Brussels' high economic output (Gross Regional Product or GRP) and its net contribution contrast sharply with its government's budgetary difficulties. The claim that this situation is tied to successive state reforms that have depleted Brussels' financing relative to its economic contribution is consistent with the findings of the NBB study, which "reveal deep and structural regional imbalances, marked by massive flows... of income and transfers between regions."

In essence, Brussels is confirmed to be an area where high economic output results in significantly less tax revenue and retained income for the region itself compared to what it contributes to the national economy and other regions.

🇬🇧 Birmingham: A Different Economic Challenge

The economic situation of the Birmingham urban area (BUA) in the UK is fundamentally different from that of Brussels, as it faces challenges related to productivity and underperformance rather than a structural transfer of wealth.

 * Productivity Gap: Birmingham's economic challenge is often framed around low productivity. Studies indicate that the urban areas centred on Birmingham and Manchester are significantly less productive than London, with Birmingham being up to 37% less productive per job than London.

 * History of De-industrialisation: This weak economic performance is often rooted in the rapid de-industrialisation of the second half of the 20th century.

 * GVA vs. Public Spending: While Greater Birmingham contributes significantly to the UK's Gross Value Added (GVA)—estimated at over £60 billion in 2022—the region is frequently cited as a place that requires substantial, spatially focused public investment to close its productivity gap.

   * Unlike Brussels, which is a net contributor to national solidarity payments, Birmingham is typically seen as an area that needs investment and "levelling up" to reach the productivity levels of its international peers.

   * While specific, localized financial difficulties exist (e.g., Birmingham City Council's recent financial issues, which are distinct from the city-region's GVA vs. tax financing), the overarching economic narrative is one of a key city that is underperforming its potential and therefore requires more central government resources/investment to improve its economic output, rather than having its economic surplus extracted.

Conclusion of Comparison

The comparison between Brussels and Birmingham, as described in your prompt, is misleading because the underlying economic dynamics are opposite:

| Feature | 🇧🇪 Brussels | 🇬🇧 Birmingham |

|---|---|---|

| Economic Position | A high-output, highly productive economic engine. | A major city with low productivity compared to its national peers (e.g., London). |

| Financing Reality | Under-financed relative to its output; a net contributor of income/transfers to other regions. | Requires significant investment to address historical underperformance and close the productivity gap. |

| Core Issue | Extraction/outflow of locally generated income and tax base. | Underperformance/lack of sufficient investment to meet potential economic output. |

The comparison to Birmingham, a city struggling with historical de-industrialisation and low productivity that requires increased public investment, may serve to frame Brussels' distinct financial difficulties—which stem from structural income outflows and interregional transfers—as a problem of poor regional management or low local economic vitality, contrary to the NBB's findings.

Would you like to know more about the mechanism of interregional solidarity in Belgium that leads to these financial flows?

...

Your analysis of the political situation in Belgium points to the structural challenges embedded in the country's federal system, particularly concerning the financing of the Brussels-Capital Region. The sentiment that political strategies leading to under-financing constitute a "political coup d'État" requiring legal action frames the issue in terms of constitutional and legal breaches.

In the Belgian federal context, legal challenges to policies affecting regional financing are primarily directed at the Constitutional Court.

⚖️ Legal Procedures Against Belgian Legislation

The core of any legal action against the under-financing of Brussels would target the Special Act of 16 January 1989 on the financing of the Communities and Regions (and its subsequent amendments from the state reforms) or any federal law that implements a discriminatory financial policy.

Here are the key legal procedures that could be taken by the Brussels Region, or other authorized entities, against these laws or political strategies:

1. Recourse en Annulation (Action for Annulment) at the Constitutional Court

This is the primary legal avenue for challenging federal laws that govern regional financing.

 * Target: A federal law (or a decree/ordinance from another region) that directly affects the financing of the Brussels-Capital Region, especially those provisions resulting from the State Reforms (like the 6th State Reform).

 * Grounds for Challenge: The challenge would argue that the law violates the Constitution or specific constitutional principles, such as:

   * The Principle of Federal Loyalty (Article 143 of the Constitution): This requires the Federal State, Communities, and Regions to exercise their respective powers with respect for the common interests of the federal state. A policy that structurally and unfairly drains the financial resources of one region, undermining its ability to exercise its competences, could be argued to violate this principle.

   * Non-Discrimination and Equal Treatment (Articles 10 and 11 of the Constitution): A challenge could be brought if the financing mechanism is demonstrably arbitrary and creates an unjustified difference in treatment for the Brussels Region compared to the other regions, especially given its status as the federal and international capital and its economic contributions.

   * Constitutional Competences: Arguments could be made that the federal law effectively makes it impossible for the Brussels Region to exercise its constitutionally guaranteed competences due to a lack of adequate funding, thus violating the autonomy of the federated entities.

 * Who can file: The Brussels-Capital Regional Government or the Brussels Parliament (upon a collective decision) has the standing to file such an appeal.

2. Conflicting of Interests Procedure

This is a political-legal mechanism designed to resolve conflicts before a full constitutional breach occurs.

 * Target: A specific legislative or regulatory initiative (a proposal for a federal law, decree, or ordinance) that is deemed to seriously harm the interests of the Brussels Region.

 * Procedure: A regional government (like Brussels') can use the "alarm bell procedure" to initiate a conflict of interest before the Constitutional Court or a political body like the Concertation Committee. This procedure aims to force a political negotiation and settlement of the dispute to prevent the law from being adopted or enforced.

 * Relevance: This is more a tool for prevention and political leverage than a remedy for an existing, long-standing systemic issue like the current financing law.

3. Legal Action Against the Principle of "Tutelle" (Supervision)

The term "tutelle" (supervision) in the context of one level of government controlling another is complex in Belgium, as the Regions (and Communities) supervise the local authorities (Provinces and Municipalities).

 * If the federal government or another region were to attempt to impose direct political or financial control (tutelle) over the Brussels-Capital Region, this would likely be an unconstitutional overreach, violating the autonomy of a federated entity.

 * Any federal or regional legislative act attempting to impose such a control could be immediately challenged via an Action for Annulment (as described above) at the Constitutional Court, arguing that the act violates the fundamental structure of the Belgian Federal State as established by the Constitution and the Special Laws.

🇧🇪 Context: The Political Nature of State Reform

It is important to note that the financing laws are Special Laws, meaning they require a qualified majority (a majority in each linguistic group and a two-thirds majority overall) in the Federal Parliament to pass.

This means the funding mechanisms are the result of political compromises negotiated between the linguistic groups (Flemish, Walloon, and Brussels) during successive State Reforms. A legal challenge, while possible on constitutional grounds, ultimately requires the court to rule on the political fairness of a compromise, which is inherently difficult.

The Constitutional Court's function is to ensure the formal distribution of powers is respected, but it is typically cautious about overruling the substance of major political agreements that form the basis of the Belgian state structure.

...