Special participation opportunity:
We are creating a grant application titled “Setting Evidence-Based Medicine on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (EBMonFHIR) as the data standard for biomedical research” for PAR-23-236 Early-stage Biomedical Data Repositories and Knowledgebases
You can help in 2 ways:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 people (BA, CE , IK, RF) participated today in up to 2 active working group meetings.
The EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide Working Group (a CDS EBMonFHIR sub-WG) viewed a clean QA report for the EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide and modified the Other Profiles page to include the M11ResearchStudy Profile. We also reviewed the presentation in development for the Global Evidence Summit SPECIAL SESSION “Using technology to make the Evidence Ecosystem more efficient and effective: global collaborations for interoperability” and applied a feature enhancement to the FEvIR®: Recommendation Justification Builder/Viewer to improve screenshots of examples for this presentation.
The Computable EBM Tools Development Working Group reviewed the workflow for adapting a recommendation using the Computable Publishing®: Recommendation Authoring Tool to prepare for the Global Evidence Summit SPECIAL SESSION “Using technology to make the Evidence Ecosystem more efficient and effective: global collaborations for interoperability” and also reviewed the many updates to the FEvIR Platform over the past week:
We are looking forward to many interactions in the Global Evidence Summit in Prague next week, including:
For the week of September 9 (no HEvKA meetings as many are in Global Evidence Summit in Prague):
Day/Time (Central European) |
Presentation/Meeting Type |
Presentation/Meeting Title |
Sep 10 Tuesday 11-12:30 am |
Special Session HALL D2 |
Using technology to make the Evidence Ecosystem more efficient and effective: global collaborations for interoperability |
Sep 11 Wednesday 7:30-8:30 am |
Working Group |
GINTech |
Sep 11 Wednesday 12:30-2 pm |
Poster |
P29 GINTech: Making Guidelines Computable |
Sep 12 Thursday 12:30-2 pm |
Poster |
P86 The GRADE Ontology Project |
Sep 13 Friday 10:04-10:11 am |
Oral Presentation |
How to Measure the Rate of Knowledge Transfer from Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice Guidance |
Sep 13 Friday 12-1:30 pm |
Poster |
P25 Scientific Evidence Code System (SEVCO): a common language for communicating evidence |
Sep 14 Saturday 9 am-5 pm |
GRADE Working Group |
agenda includes GRADE Ontology update |
Quote for thought: “Words can inspire, thoughts can provoke, but only action truly brings you closer to your dreams.” ―Brad Sugars
Brian S. Alper, MD, MSPH, FAAFP, FAMIA
CEO, Computable Publishing LLC
bal...@computablepublishing.com
Making Science Machine-Interpretable
http://computablepublishing.com
Lead, HEALTH EVIDENCE KNOWLEDGE ACCELERATOR
President, Scientific Knowledge Accelerator Foundation
Read about The Mission Change of a Lifetime
"It only takes a pebble to start an avalanche."
To get involved or stay informed: HEvKA Project Page on FEvIR Platform, HEvKA Project Page on HL7 Confluence, or join any of the groups that are now meeting in the following weekly schedule: Weekly Meeting Schedule and Link:
To join any of these meetings: ________________________________________________________________________________ Microsoft Teams meeting Join on your computer, mobile app or room device Click here to join the meeting *New Link as of January 2024! Meeting ID: 279 232 517 719 Download Teams | Join on the web Or call in (audio only) +1 929-346-7156,,35579956# United States, New York City Phone Conference ID: 355 799 56# Meeting support by ComputablePublishing.com
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The views and opinions included in this email belong to their author and do not necessarily mirror the views and opinions of the company. Our employees are obliged not to make any defamatory clauses, infringe, or authorize infringement of any legal right. Therefore, the company will not take any liability for such statements included in emails. In case of any damages or other liabilities arising, employees are fully responsible for the content of their emails.
Special participation opportunity:
We are creating a grant application titled “Setting Evidence-Based Medicine on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (EBMonFHIR) as the data standard for biomedical research” for PAR-23-236 Early-stage Biomedical Data Repositories and Knowledgebases
You can help in 2 ways:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 people (AS, BA, HL, KW, MA, PW, SM, TD) participated today in up to 2 active working group meetings.
The Risk of Bias Terminology Working Group reviewed the feedback on multiple Rating of Bias Risk terms and revised the definition of rating of bias risk, re-opening it for vote. The 6 rating of bias risk terms open for voting are:
Term |
Definition |
Alternative Terms |
Comment for application |
The result of a qualitative assessment of the likelihood and potential impact of systematic distortion in research results. |
Bias is defined as a systematic distortion in research results (estimation of effect, association, or inference). Distortions in research results
means differences between the reported results (findings, conclusions, effect estimates) and the actuality (the truth, the estimand [the quantity targeted for estimation]). |
||
The result of a qualitative assessment that there is a low likelihood and potential impact of systematic distortion in research results. |
A 'low risk of bias' rating denotes a judgment that there are no serious concerns for bias. The 'potential impact of systematic distortion in research results' may include the impact on the clinical interpretation or conclusion of the study findings. |
||
The result of a qualitative assessment that there is some likelihood and potential impact of systematic distortion in research results, and this likelihood and potential impact is between low and high. |
|
The 'potential impact of systematic distortion in research results' may include the impact on the clinical interpretation or conclusion of the study findings. |
|
The result of a qualitative assessment that there is a high likelihood and potential impact of systematic distortion in research results. |
|
A 'high risk of bias' rating denotes a judgment that there are serious concerns for bias. The 'potential impact of systematic distortion in research results' may include the impact on the clinical interpretation or conclusion of the study findings. |
|
The result of a qualitative assessment that there is such as high likelihood and potential impact of systematic distortion in research results that the findings are not valid. |
|
The colloquial term 'fatal flaw' is sometimes used to report a critical risk of bias, signifying no further use of the study being assessed. |
|
There is insufficient information to make a qualitative assessment regarding the likelihood and potential impact of systematic distortion in research results. |
Unlike the terms
low risk of bias,
moderate risk of bias, and
high risk of bias, the term 'undetermined risk of bias' does not express a positive assertion of concern. The term 'unclear risk of bias' is not explicitly defined because it could be used to represent 'undetermined risk of bias' or
moderate risk of bias. |
To participate you can join the Scientific Evidence Code System (SEVCO) Expert Working Group at https://fevir.net/resources/Project/27845.
The GRADE Ontology Working Group reviewed a presentation for the GRADE Ontology Project Update to be presented at the GRADE Working Group meeting in Prague on September 14. Related meetings and presentations at the Global Evidence Summit include:
Day/Time (Central European) |
Presentation/Meeting Type |
Presentation/Meeting Title |
Sep 10 Tuesday 11-12:30 am |
Special Session HALL D2 |
Using technology to make the Evidence Ecosystem more efficient and effective: global collaborations for interoperability |
Sep 11 Wednesday 7:30-8:30 am |
Working Group |
GIN Tech |
Sep 11 Wednesday 12:30-2 pm |
Poster |
P29 GIN Tech: Making Guidelines Computable |
Sep 12 Thursday 12:30-2 pm |
Poster |
P86 The GRADE Ontology Project |
Sep 13 Friday 10:04-10:11 am |
Oral Presentation |
How to Measure the Rate of Knowledge Transfer from Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice Guidance |
Sep 13 Friday 12-1:30 pm |
Poster |
P25 Scientific Evidence Code System (SEVCO): a common language for communicating evidence |
Sep 14 Saturday 9 am-5 pm |
GRADE Working Group |
agenda includes GRADE Ontology update |
The terms Plausible opposing confounding and Large effect each received 6 affirmative and 2 negative votes. We reviewed the comments for Plausible opposing confounding and reset it for voting, and we are still open to comments on Large effect, so there are 2 terms open for vote:
Term |
Definition |
Alternative Terms |
Comment for application |
Confounding that may influence the effect in the opposite direction of the observed effect. |
|
Confounding is the distortion of an association between an exposure and an outcome by a third variable that is associated with both the exposure and the outcome. The effect of confounding may be suspected or observed.
|
|
An effect size that is substantially far from the null. |
|
If the effect is reported with a risk ratio, hazard ratio, or other relative measure for which a value of 1 means a null effect, then a 'large effect' may be considered for any value substantially greater than
1 (e.g. > 2) or any value substantially lesser than 1 (e.g. < 0.5). |
Please visit the term pages via the links in the table above and click the Comment button if you would like to share any comments that will be openly viewed by anyone visiting the page. You may also click the Vote button to anonymously register your agreement or disagreement with this term. If you vote ‘No’ you need to add a comment (along with your vote, not publicly shared with your name) explaining what change is needed to reach agreement.
To make voting on multiple terms easier you can use My Ballot at https://fevir.net/myballot -- You can go to My Ballot and mark any term with Yes if you approve, or with No (and add your comment to express what change is needed), or you can navigate to each term page to see additional detail.
Quote for thought: “Don’t stop when you are tired. Stop when you are done.” ―Unknown
Thanks, Chuck.
HL7 supporting the use of FHIR as a standard for science data exchange in addition to health data exchange may be the difference for this NIH opportunity, and this NIH opportunity may be the key to establishing FHIR as the expected approach for research data sharing.
Brian
Brian S. Alper, MD, MSPH, FAAFP, FAMIA
CEO, Computable Publishing LLC
bal...@computablepublishing.com
Making Science Machine-Interpretable
http://computablepublishing.com
Lead, HEALTH EVIDENCE KNOWLEDGE ACCELERATOR
President, Scientific Knowledge Accelerator Foundation
Read about The Mission Change of a Lifetime
"It only takes a pebble to start an avalanche."
From: Charles Jaffe, MD <cja...@hl7.org>
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2024 7:16 PM
To: Brian Alper <bal...@computablepublishing.com>; Joanne Dehnbostel <jdehn...@computablepublishing.com>; Health Evidence Knowledge Accelerator (HEvKA) <HE...@computablepublishing.com>
Cc: Karen Van Hentenryck <kare...@hl7.org>
Subject: Re: Health Evidence Knowledge Accelerator (HEvKA) Daily Progress September 6, 2024
Brian,
Thanks for the reminder. I apologize for the delay, but I needed approval from the Executive Committee. I hope to obtain that on Monday.
At the moment, I am flying home from Boston, but always feel free to call me
Very best,
Chuck
Fyi
All the best
Iorio, Alfonso
From:
Brian Alper <bal...@computablepublishing.com>
Date: Saturday, September 7, 2024 at 6:29
AM
To: Charles Jaffe, MD (HL7) <cja...@hl7.org>, Joanne Dehnbostel <jdehn...@computablepublishing.com>, Health Evidence Knowledge Accelerator (HEvKA) <HE...@computablepublishing.com>
Cc: Karen Van Hentenryck <kare...@hl7.org>
Subject: RE: Health Evidence Knowledge Accelerator (HEvKA) Daily Progress September 6, 2024
Caution: External email. |
Special participation opportunity:
We are creating a grant application titled “Setting Evidence-Based Medicine on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (EBMonFHIR) as the data standard for biomedical research” for PAR-23-236 Early-stage Biomedical Data Repositories and Knowledgebases
You can help in 2 ways:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No HEvKA meetings today (or this week) as we are participating in the Global Evidence Summit:
Day/Time (Central European) |
Presentation/Meeting Type |
Presentation/Meeting Title |
Sep 10 Tuesday 11-12:30 am |
Special Session HALL D2 |
Using technology to make the Evidence Ecosystem more efficient and effective: global collaborations for interoperability |
Sep 11 Wednesday 7:30-8:30 am |
Working Group |
GIN Tech |
Sep 11 Wednesday 12:30-2 pm |
Poster |
P29 GIN Tech: Making Guidelines Computable |
Sep 12 Thursday 12:30-2 pm |
Poster |
P86 The GRADE Ontology Project |
Sep 13 Friday 10:04-10:11 am |
Oral Presentation |
How to Measure the Rate of Knowledge Transfer from Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice Guidance |
Sep 13 Friday 12-1:30 pm |
Poster |
P25 Scientific Evidence Code System (SEVCO): a common language for communicating evidence |
Sep 14 Saturday 9 am-5 pm |
GRADE Working Group |
agenda includes GRADE Ontology update |
Recent Releases on the FEvIR Platform:
Quote for thought: “Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go.” ―T.S. Eliot
Special participation opportunity:
We are creating a grant application titled “Setting Evidence-Based Medicine on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (EBMonFHIR) as the data standard for biomedical research” for PAR-23-236 Early-stage Biomedical Data Repositories and Knowledgebases
You can help in 2 ways:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No HEvKA meetings today (or this week) as we are participating in the Global Evidence Summit:
Day/Time (Central European) |
Presentation/Meeting Type |
Presentation/Meeting Title |
Sep 10 Tuesday 11-12:30 am |
Special Session HALL D2 |
Using technology to make the Evidence Ecosystem more efficient and effective: global collaborations for interoperability |
Sep 11 Wednesday 7:30-8:30 am |
Working Group HALL D3 |
GIN Tech |
Sep 11 Wednesday 12:30-2 pm |
Poster P29 |
GIN Tech: Making Guidelines Computable |
Sep 12 Thursday 12:30-2 pm |
Poster P86 |
The GRADE Ontology Project |
Sep 13 Friday 10:04-10:11 am |
Oral Presentation |
How to Measure the Rate of Knowledge Transfer from Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice Guidance |
Sep 13 Friday 12-1:30 pm |
Poster P25 |
Scientific Evidence Code System (SEVCO): a common language for communicating evidence |
Sep 14 Saturday 9 am-5 pm |
GRADE Working Group |
agenda includes GRADE Ontology update |
The Special Session “Using technology to make the Evidence Ecosystem more efficient and effective: global collaborations for interoperability” was well attended and well received. The room capacity was limited to 100 and we learned that additional people were interested but not allowed in for fire safety reasons. Presentation slides for this 90-minute session area available here.
Personally, I was honored unexpectedly at the Annual General Meeting of the Guidelines International Network to be named a Fellow of the Guidelines International Network. (And I thought I was done putting letters after my name.)
Quote for thought: “If we were meant to stay in one place, we’d have roots instead of feet.” –Rachel Wolchin
Brian S. Alper, MD, MSPH, FAAFP, FAMIA, FGIN
CEO, Computable Publishing LLC
bal...@computablepublishing.com
Making Science Machine-Interpretable
http://computablepublishing.com
Lead, HEALTH EVIDENCE KNOWLEDGE ACCELERATOR
President, Scientific Knowledge Accelerator Foundation
Read about The Mission Change of a Lifetime
"It only takes a pebble to start an avalanche."
The GIN Tech meeting included participants from China, Denmark, Finland, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United States.
Feedback from implementers revealed that the ComparativeEvidenceReport Profile in the EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide, which supports use of the same population group, intervention group, and comparator group for all outcomes works for a single research study but not for a synthesis of studies where the observed groups are different for each outcome. We drafted a ComparativeEvidenceSynthesisReport Profile to support this need for evidence syntheses.
Quote for thought: “Don’t tell people about your dreams. Show them your dreams.” ―Unknown
Special participation opportunity:
We are creating a grant application titled “Setting Evidence-Based Medicine on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (EBMonFHIR) as the data standard for biomedical research” for PAR-23-236 Early-stage Biomedical Data Repositories and Knowledgebases
You can help in 2 ways:
As noted yesterday, feedback from implementers revealed that the ComparativeEvidenceReport Profile in the EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide, which supports use of the same population group, intervention group, and comparator group for all outcomes works for a single research study but not for a synthesis of studies where the observed groups are different for each outcome. We drafted a ComparativeEvidenceSynthesisReport Profile to support this need for evidence syntheses, and after debugging it is now available in the EBMonFHIR Implementation Guide. Next steps will be to modify our MAGICapp and GRADEpro converter tools to use this new Profile and learn how to improve the Profile in the process.
Quote for thought: “I’m not a product of my circumstances. I am a product of my decisions.” ―Stephen Covey
Special participation opportunity:
We are creating a grant application titled “Setting Evidence-Based Medicine on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (EBMonFHIR) as the data standard for biomedical research” for PAR-23-236 Early-stage Biomedical Data Repositories and Knowledgebases
You can help in 2 ways:
In a subsequent update and/or on the HEvKA project page at https://fevir.net/resources/Project/29272 -- we will share links to the presentations noted above.
Quote for thought: “When I hear somebody sigh, ‘Life is hard,’ I am always tempted to ask, ‘Compared to what?'” —Sydney J. Harris
No HEvKA meetings today (or Tuesday through Thursday) as we are participating in the HL7 Working Group Meeting.
In the HL7 FHIR Connectathon Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) Track, we summarized the weekend with the following:
Quote for thought: “We just agreed in a group delusion that it works” —out-of-context statement uttered at a standards development work group meeting
No HEvKA meetings today (or tomorrow or Thursday) as we are participating in the HL7 Working Group Meeting.
A presentation on What is Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR? was very well received.
To support a common approach to data dictionaries to support sharing the ‘code key’ when sharing research datasets, we will propose tomorrow to the HL7 Biomedical Research and Regulation (BRR) Work Group to create a FHIR DataDictionary Resource. First draft model available at EBMonFHIR IG DataDictionary Profile.
Releases today on the FEvIR Platform:
Quote for thought: “If you're doing something the same way you have been doing it for ten years, the chances are you are doing it wrong.” — Charles F. Kettering.
No HEvKA meetings today (or tomorrow) as we are participating in the HL7 Working Group Meeting.
Today’s events are mostly captured in the ‘Update of EBMonFHIR activities’ that is transiently listed in the FHIR Trackers across EBMonFHIR/HEvKA efforts, followed by a ‘to do list’ for the EBMonFHIR project.
Quote for thought: “Quality is not an extension.” — Floyd Eisenberg, MD, MPH, FACP