[eaccelerator] SHM module

Skip to first unread message

Ilkka Huotari

May 8, 2010, 2:51:47 AM5/8/10
to eaccelerator

Is it OK if I add the shm module to eAccelerator - meaning that I do
the work on my computer and submit the files/patches to someone in
charge (Bart probably), who can maybe take it further?

I would need the shm module, I've been using it heavily, and so far
I've used eA


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eaccelerator" group.
To post to this group, send email to eaccel...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to eaccelerator...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/eaccelerator?hl=en.

Ilkka Huotari

May 13, 2010, 5:49:51 AM5/13/10
to eaccelerator
I tried to add that cache.c and cache.h in there, but seems like a lot
of things have changed.

I don't suppose you (ea developers) would want to add the shared
memory module into the current ea?


Bart Vanbrabant

May 31, 2010, 2:28:54 PM5/31/10
to eaccelerator

We are not going to integrate this again in the ea code. You can
implement the old functions in php if you want using the shm_*
function php itself. If someone writes a php implementation we would
gladly distribute it through the project.



Brandon Amaro

Jun 3, 2010, 3:54:52 PM6/3/10
to eaccel...@googlegroups.com
There is one problem with that idea. The shm_* functions aren't enabled
in PHP by default. I know they are enabled PHP packages from the Remi
RPM Repo but I don't know about from other places... In addition, just
my looking at the shm_* functions, I'm not sure all of the functions
could be implemented. For compability and easy of use reasons, I think
it might be best if the functions were put into a separate php
extension. That's just my opinion.

Owner and Founder of UFT

Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages