DynamoRIO Users

There is a section on the IR in the docs. And it seems to already have some content here: https://

Thank you both, the second approach will suit my needs better. On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 11:50:01

Hi, Note that DynamoRIO's code cache is shared between threads by default. This means that a code

Ok, it manages to set the breakpoint but crashes on first hit: #0 drtable_create (capacity=4096,

Thank you. I assume that FDO is Feedback Driven Optimisation which is the same as Profile Guided

Sounds good. Created this PR https://github.com/DynamoRIO/dynamorio/pull/6111 Hopefully I found the

I tested this. It always returns 0 (OPSZ_NA). It may be only implemented for SVE but I'm not sure

Thank you for your help. I will file a github issue. As you said, multi client use is rare. In my

In what context are you gathering a call stack? If you're inside "regular" code you

Yes, Ubuntu22. $ uname -a Linux fv-az338-369 5.15.0-1037-azure #44-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 20 13:19:31 UTC

Noted. Yes, after upgrading to DynamoRIO-Linux-9.93.19503 I don't see this error anymore. On

Please see dr_insert_mbr_instrumentation() which is listed along with the other branch profiling

If you are hitting an access violation (0xc0000005) you want to get a callstack of that fault as the

Hello, In order to assist you better, would you be able to run this with a debug build and provide us

It work. Thank you!!! Derek Bruening 在 2023年5月19日 星期五下午1:01:14 [UTC+8] 的信中寫道： Are you hitting an open

If you mean, is there a sample client already existing in the repository that combines those two, no.

> Docs for ADD instruction say that if it has 3-rd source operand it's shift/extend. Which

If you want to convert to some other format you would need to create such a converter yourself. I

Can you add more details of the build environment to https://github.com/DynamoRIO/dynamorio/issues/

Thank you for pointing this out. I have opened an issue for this, and will get it resolved: https://

Re: what file: there are multiple; searching for "Invalid header" and stepping to there in

Além disso, você pode esclarecer que trabalho é esse para que possamos ajudá-lo melhor? On Friday,

Thank you for your answers :) I'm not sure what I'm doing yet, I'm exploring how and

Hi, That's the right approach. Is there any reason you didn't want to use drsyms? On

Help is wanted in that area. If you are interested in contributing time toward that feature that

I think the problem steams from the drreg reservation optimization and lazy register unreserving.

We found that this is because g++-11+ produces DWARFv5 output which is not yet supported in

Are there supposed to be two tables anyways? I don't use per thread data. Edgar Neubauer schrieb

The reason would be that the defaults for the compilers at that time were older than C++11 so

Dr. Memory has integration with Dr. Fuzz. This is mentioned and linked on the top of the page which I