Fw: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiry
Sunil
Finally he NHAI responded.Please find attached their response, you may like to comment.Its nothign much.. but a goo news is that Bhels saab 100M ROW in respect 2021Regards,RejimonNOTE : If any of you knows Mr. K S Anand (F/o Rahul Anand, who lost in NH8), kindly share with Mr. Anand this info or let me know his email id.--
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:29 PM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Yogesh Gupta(US/DPG),This further to tele-conversation with Ms. Praveen Batra your PS on 20/1/2010.Isn't the non response from NHAI confirms, Ignorant of DPG ? or they even dont recognise govt of India ?The provision reads action must be within 6 weeks and not later than 3 months(well over due).
Also I would like to know what exactly the role of DPG if some ministry or its agencies not respond as per provision displayed in your website http://dpg.bharatsarkar.nic.in/. Are there any system in DPG to check the pending status where response not received from concerned ministry or agency ? I hope your software must have such provision.The DPG perfomance graff certainly impressive, where as actual resolving of grievnce on ground differ, if not in other case at least in this two complainants case against NHAI.I would like to know what action DPG going to take against the NHAI officials who ignore such public grievnance system. I would like to know under which provision or departmental procedure action will be initiated or there is no such provision.Apprecite you provide this information at the earliest so that we could share with netcitizen and civil society groups online.Thanking you,Rejimon C KDwarka Forum.--On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Yogesh Gupta(US/DPG),Please refer to your letter dated 16/10/2009 concerning Ref Nop DPG/V/2009/00005(2)MRTAH. I am regret to infom you the outcome is nothing but passing the buck. Like post office the letter moves from one to other, wasting paper, time and most importanly resource.I am sorry to ask:Dont you think your letter not even valued of a TOILET PAPER by our govt staffs at Ministry of Transport, NHAI ?Does it also means the Directorate of Public Grievance have no teething power?We would much appreciate you clarify the above.Thanking you,Rejimon C K.President-Dwarka Forum(Regd).
--On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:02 AM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Shri. Vijay ShankarDGM(Adm & Coord)Sir,We hope this grievance letter will further transferred like a post office and look forward receiving concerted response/action.Regards,Rejimon CKDwarka Forum.--
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Pillai K.V, GM (LA) <pill...@nhai.org> wrote:
Mr. Rejimon.CK
President-Dwarka Forum(Regd)
Sir,
Your letter on the subject received from the Ministry of RTH has been forwarded to
Shri Vijay Shankar, DGM(Admin) & Director (Public Grievances), NHAI
for needful action.
Yours faithfully
KV Pillai
GM(LA)
From: REJIMON C K [mailto:reji...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:52 PM
To: Singh Brijeshwar; Pillai K.V, GM (LA)
Cc: purshotam behl
Subject: Fwd: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiry
Shri. K V Pillai(DG Admin)
NHAI
Dwarka,
Mr. Pillai,
Please find enclosed the letter from Ministry of Road Transport and Highways.
Appreciate your office will respond to this at the earliest.
Thanking you,
Rejimon C K
President-Dwarka Forum(Regd).
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:20 PM
Subject: Fwd: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiry
To: "Secretary, Ministry of Transport & Highways" <tran...@nic.in>, Kamal Nath <na...@sansad.nic.in>, "Mahadeo Singh Khandela,MoS" <tran...@nic.in>, "Ratanjit PN Singh,MoS" <rpn....@nic.in>
Cc: chai...@nhai.orgTo:
Secretary
Ministry of Road Transport & Highways
Tranpport Bhawan
1 Parliament street
New Delhi
Sir,
Kindly allow me to refer to letter dated 16/10/2009 from Shri. Yogesh Gupta, US, Directorage of Public Grievances, Cabinet Secretariat, GOI.
Ref Nop DPG/V/2009/00005(2)MRTAH.
Through vide letter my complaint is transferred to you.
Kindly provide with your reply and action taken report as directed by DPG.
Thanking you,
Rejimon C K.
Dwarka Forum.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>Date: Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiryTo: Man Mohan Singh PM <pm...@pmo.nic.in>, Saibal Sarkar Dy Scy PG PMO <saibal...@nic.in>
Today 8th Oct 09 the NH8 on Radisson flyover jammed on both side.
Again there is fatal accident of biker. DEAD BODY is lying on the road.
WHO OWNS RESPONSIBILITY?
It's SHAME and Govt is not taking any action against NHAI and Contractor DSC.
Rejimon C K
President - Dwarka ForumOn 8/26/09, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sir, In addition.
> This media reports dated 26/8/2009 confirms the MRTPS findings.
> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/city/delhi/Gurgaon-e-way-cant-yet-collect-toll-Govt-report/articleshow/4934505.cms
>
> Appreciate immediate enquiry against NAHI officials.
> Thanking you,
>
> Rejimon
>
>
> On 8/26/09, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hon. Prime Minister,
>>
>> We keep listening from govt through media/webiste/news about
>> infrastructure.
>>
>> *Have a look* on National Capital Delhis connecting *National Highway
>> No.8
>> *which were given to *Private Public Partnership called Delhi-Gurgaon
>> Super Express Link*.
>> Every day the commuters have really horrible experience of SNAIL Movement
>> of Traffic and Jams on Main Highway which is less than 90mtr(as
>> prescribed
>> in MPD 2021). A good number of Service roads are not completed, including
>> flyovers/footover bridge etc. The concessionaries are collecting
>> Tolls(based
>> on wrong project by RITES) irrespective of service deficiency and on
>> temproary completion certificate, . The regulatory authorities the NHAI
>> keeps a BLIND EYE,why they doing so, probably the anti corruption
>> department
>> of CBI will have answer if looked into.MRTP probe confirms the
>> irregularities.
>>
>> With much fanfare the road opened and huge collection of tolls by private
>> player on wrong projection.
>> Prima facie it is evident there is alleged corruption and nexus between
>> NHAI and private player.
>>
>> May we request your good office to order or ask CBI anti corruption
>> department to monitor/observe the activities of NHAI official connected
>> with
>> NH-8 (Delhi-Gurgaon Express Road). So that truth be upheld.
>>
>> Thanking you,
>>
>> Rejimon C K.
>> President
>> Dwarka Forum(Regd)
>> 453, Plot No. 4
>> Sector 22, Dwarka
>> New Delhi-77
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Aug 26, 2009 9:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK
>> and
>> demand enquiry
>> To: Kamal Nath <na...@sansad.nic.in>, Pratyunshu Sinha CVC New Delhi <
>> c...@nic.in>
>> Cc: scji...@nhai.org, vkra...@nhai.org, chai...@nhai.org,
>> "SKDash,CVO"
>> <sk....@nic.in>, Kannan Soundara rajan <sounda...@gmail.com>,
>> purshotam behl <jaipu...@yahoo.co.in>
>>
>> Sir, may we know the reason for no answer or action?
>> Now the commutters/users of NH8 on notorious express link from
>> Rajokri/dwarka link put on harassing traffic jam for over 30 mintes,
>> a daily scene.
>>
>> Do you have solution to offer?
>>
>> Rejimon C K
>> 9810315897
>>
>>
>> On 8/19/09, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Sir,
>> >
>> > Please note my earlier communication about the lack of transparency by
>> NHAI
>> > on NH-8 Delhi-Guragaon Express confirm by these Meida reports by Indian
>> > Express.
>> >
>> > The Alleged contracts are hidden, the Project not completed as per
>> Reports
>> > and obtained only partial clerance. A good portion of work is still not
>> > completed however the concessionaries charges toll and that too as per
>> the
>> > investigation by MRTPC the unethical trade practices are followed.
>> > The NAHI staffs responsible are keeping a BLIND EYE. Whay for WHAT ?
>> > This
>> > need to be investigated.
>> > The commuters on this road are put UNDUE HARASSMENT/HARDSHIP. The
>> > Vehicle
>> > moves in less than 25 KM per hour in some stretches. The Services Lanes
>> are
>> > not constructed at many locations to help some petrol pumps and
>> > property
>> > owners along the NH-8.
>> >
>> > Appreciate your good office will order an enquiry and book culprits in
>> > NHAI.
>> >
>> > Thanking you,
>> >
>> > Rejimon C K.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Aug 19, 2009 12:42 PM
>> > Subject: Re: MOST URGENT: Appeal U/S 19(1) Right to Information Act.
>> > NH-8
>> > (From Gurgaon- Delhi)
>> > To: DWARKA FORUM <DWARKA-R...@googlegroups.com>
>> >
>> >
>> > Highway operator under the scanner
>> > The Delhi-Gurgaon Super Connectivity (DGSC) highway, along with the
>> > NHAI
>> > and
>> > consultancy firm Rites, is being investigated by the Monopolies and
>> > Restrictive Trade Practices Commission for allegedly setting toll
>> > charges
>> > on
>> > wrong projections of vehicle movement and service deficiency.
>> >
>> > As per investigation by the Director General of Investigations and
>> > Registration, the Commission’s probe unit, DGSC (formerly Jaypee DSC
>> > Ventures) has not completed certain basic amenities on the 27.5-km
>> > Delhi-Gurgaon stretch and is still operating on a temporary completion
>> > certificate.
>> >
>> > The DGIR stated in its report: “It is evident the traffic analysis
>> > submitted
>> > by the DGSC to NHAI and Rites was very under-projected and... the toll
>> fees
>> > to be charged in 2020 are being charged now, for each category of
>> > vehicles.”
>> >
>> >
>> > (The DGSC is a special purpose vehicle promoted by DSC Ltd, a joint
>> venture
>> > in which it has over 90 per cent stake. DSC Ltd is responsible for its
>> > operation and maintenance.)
>> >
>> > “The DGSC has adopted a... method that amounts to unfair trade
>> > practice,”
>> > the DGIR said.
>> >
>> > Slamming the NHAI for issuing a toll notification based on
>> under-projected
>> > figures, the report stated: “It is evident that the NHAI has influenced
>> the
>> > notified toll charges (in a manner that resulted) in undue gains to
>> > DGSC
>> at
>> > the cost of the public at large.” The report stated the DGSC’s
>> > estimated
>> > projection was 56,416 vehicles in 2006, 78,711 in 2011, 1,08,224 in
>> > 2016
>> > and
>> > 1,85,258 in 2025. However, after examining documents, it found that
>> around
>> > 1,33,808 vehicles used the toll plaza on the Delhi-Haryana border at
>> Siroli
>> > and 48,693 in Kherki Daula in June this year.
>> >
>> >
>> http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/highway-operator-under-the-scanner/503605/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Lack of smart tags spells extra time, money, say Expressway commuters
>> > *Font Size *
>> > -A<
>> http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/lack-of-smart-tags-spells-extra-time-money-say-expressway-commuters/503601/#
>> >
>> > +A<
>> http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/lack-of-smart-tags-spells-extra-time-money-say-expressway-commuters/503601/#
>> >
>> > Tanushree Roy Chowdhury *Posted: Aug 19, 2009 at 0043 hrs IST*
>> > *Gurgaon* Confusion surrounds the sale of tags for commuters on the
>> > Delhi-Gurgaon Expressway. The commuters, many of whom want to try out
>> > the
>> > tags for the first time, have complained of their non-availability.
>> >
>> > While some said they have been trying without any success to get a tag
>> for
>> > their vehicles for almost three months now, officials at concessionaire
>> DSC
>> > Ltd said some “streamlining” process at the backend could be causing
>> > the
>> > confusion since there are tags available with the firm.
>> >
>> > “There could be regular defaulters who do not recharge their accounts
>> once
>> > they expire. We keep a certain stock that gets replenished every month
>> with
>> > new shipments coming in. It is neither in our economic interest nor is
>> > it
>> > beneficial for public relations to not make tags available for our
>> > customers. We will certainly look into the matter,” a DSC Ltd
>> spokesperson
>> > said.
>> >
>> > “I cross the Delhi-Gurgaon Expressway toll plaza every day to get to my
>> > office in Gurgaon. Despite repeated attempts in person and through the
>> DSC
>> > customer care, I have not been able to get a tag for my car. The
>> > standard
>> > response is that the ‘tags are out of stock and will be available by
>> > the
>> > end
>> > of the month’,” South Delhi resident Sanjay Chakraborty said. “I pay Rs
>> 18
>> > each time I cross the toll plaza and wait for 5 to 7 minutes on an
>> average.
>> > If I had a tag, I would pay only half that amount.”
>> >
>> > Some commuters have alleged that by not providing them with tags DSC
>> > Ltd
>> is
>> > earning higher revenue. “Since it is an NHAI project, the authorities
>> > concerned must step in to ensure the private player does not fleece and
>> > cause hardship to commuters on this account,” Junaid, who works in
>> Gurgaon,
>> > said.
>> >
>> > Others confirmed they had to wait to get their tags. “I was told the
>> > tags
>> > were ‘not available’ and had to wait nearly a month. When I lodged a
>> > complaint with the NHAI and mailed DSC, the tags became available the
>> same
>> > day. I was told they are always available at the IGI toll plaza but
>> people
>> > don’t go there. The DSC’s callous attitude, lack of police presence and
>> > lack
>> > of control by NHAI are responsible for this mess,” Nemesh, a Gurgaon
>> > resident, said.
>> >
>> > While Nemesh was fortunate enough to get a tag, Sukhpreet Singh, who
>> works
>> > in the telecom industry, is still waiting to get his first tag. “I went
>> to
>> > the customer care at the Delhi-Gurgaon toll plaza to get a tag in the
>> last
>> > week of July but the executive there told me new tags were unavailable.
>> > I
>> > checked on August 14 and was told fresh stocks were unlikely till at
>> least
>> > September.”
>> >
>> > Last year, DSC, the developer, had told the Ministry of Road Transport
>> and
>> > Highways that until 70 per cent of commuters switch to tags, proper
>> > functioning of the expressway and reduction in the waiting time could
>> > not
>> > be
>> > expected. Thereafter they had launched a campaign to increase the sale
>> > of
>> > tags by offering discounts soon after the expressway was thrown open.
>> >
>> > *Smart tags*
>> > A Smart Tag is an electronic device the size of a computer mouse that
>> > is
>> > installed on the windscreen, behind the rear view mirror of one’s
>> vehicle.
>> > It is charged with the denomination of one’s choice and has the
>> capability
>> > of interacting with sensors placed at the toll gates. All one has to do
>> is
>> > to slow down to 15 km/h near the toll gates; the sensors at the gate
>> > interact with the Smart Tag and the transaction is recorded, and the
>> > toll
>> > is
>> > deducted. A confirmation beeps inside the car — all of this takes less
>> than
>> > a minute and is the best way of doing away with waiting periods at toll
>> > gates.
>> >
>> > No of vehicles using Expressway daily: 2 lakh vehicles on an average
>> > (on
>> > all
>> > three tolls)
>> >
>> > No of tag users at present: 40 %
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 6/3/09, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Please see a reply received from NHAI following appeal filed u/s 19(1)
>> of
>> >> RTI Act 2005.
>> >>
>> >> Please refer to your reply dated 26/5/2009 DGM-T655.
>> >>
>> >> We regret to note the following:
>> >>
>> >> 1.FAA not granted any hearing for the RTI Applicaiton appeal filed u/s
>> >> 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 dated 11/5/09.
>> >> 2. The reply only refer to 13/6/09 and rest of the email not received
>> by
>> >> NHAI or no notings created ?
>> >> 3. *refer to q No.2. The alleged contract with consortium MUST be
>> >> uploaded
>> >> into website for public domain under statutory disclosure of Section 4
>> of
>> >> RTI Act 2005. As the contract have large implication on public as such
>> >> and
>> >> have all right to know its contents*.
>> >> 4. ref 3 ) As per Master plan the road width of National Highway in
>> Delhi
>> >> as per MPD 2021 is 90 meter. This shows that the MPD 2021 violated?
>> >> 5. ref 4 a b) As per reply and information the original plan had
>> flyover,
>> >> so the change in plan certainly benefitted consortium or not disclosed
>> by
>> >> PIO/FAA. Kindly confirm while signing agreement there was no Flyover
>> >> at
>> >> Kapasehra Junction.
>> >> 6. 7a). The Reply by PIO and FAA is Vouge. The provision is certainly
>> >> there
>> >> on the contract with consortium, if the contract is not executed as
>> >> per
>> >> agreement then who is at default ? Who at NHAI is responsible for non
>> >> implimentation. Is the onus lies withNHAI a govt agency or the private
>> >> consortium ?
>> >> Please note that in case of any accident caused by non scheduled
>> >> vehilces
>> >> such as Two Wheelers on speed highway. The responsibility and
>> >> derlition
>> >> of
>> >> duty will be vested with NHAI/Consortium jointly and severely.
>> >>
>> >> 7. ref 10) As per ref reply the NHAI issued only a PROVISIONAL
>> COMPLETION
>> >> CERTIFICATE ? This also means the NHAI staffs were not involved in PCC
>> >> issue ?
>> >> 8. Ref 11) INFORMATION DENIED. THE REPLY IS VOUGE AND INSTANT APPEAL
>> >> STAND
>> >> AND COMPLAINT WILL BE LODGED WITH CIC U/S 18 AND APPEAL U/S 19 OF RTI
>> >> ACT.
>> >>
>> >> Fact also to be added on ground:
>> >>
>> >> a. The over all quality of Road is VERY SUB Standard with many places
>> >> found
>> >> uneven and jurky road surface on Delhi sides.
>> >> b. The sweeping cleaning, greening and landscaping works not completed
>> >> properly.
>> >> c. The guards/marshal posted at diffent placed have no training nor
>> >> equipped to handle situations of accidents etc..
>> >> d. During the peak hour and NO ENTRY RESTRICTION HOURS Trucks and
>> >> Heavy
>> >> trucks are allowed by Toll Plaza and parked on both sides of NH-8
>> >> Delhi
>> >> portion, clearly violating the Supreme Court Direction and may invite
>> >> Contempt proceedings.
>> >> e. There is clear direction on OVERLOADED Trucks cause heavy
>> >> pollution,
>> >> However govt agencies like NH-8 and its Partners contractors like DSC
>> >> ignorant of these directions.
>> >> f. The File noting dated 2/7/2008.. year passed till date no progress?
>> >> Great work NHAI. Keept it up.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 5/11/09, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> To:
>> >>> Shri. Subhash Chand Jindal
>> >>>
>> >>> Chief General Manager (Corridor Management) and First Appalet
>> Authority.
>> >>> National Highway Authority
>> >>> G-5/G6 Sector 10,
>> >>> Dwarka, New Delhi-75
>> >>>
>> >>> Phone :-91-011- 25074100 & 25074200 Ext : 1105, Mobile No. 9873002084
>> >>>
>> >>> Email Id :- scji...@nhai.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> cc:
>> >>>
>> >>> Mr. V.K.Rajawat
>> >>>
>> >>> General Manager (Tech) & Public Information Officer.
>> >>>
>> >>> Phone :-91-011- 25074100 & 25074200 Ext : 1101, Mobile No. 9899314750
>> >>>
>> >>> Email Id :- vkra...@nhai.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Sir,
>> >>>
>> >>> Please refer to my RTI Applciation dated 31/3/2009. The reply ref No.
>> >>> NHAI/DGM(T)/NH-8/RTI/2008/621 received only on 8th May 2009. Well
>> beyond
>> >>> stipulated time frame as per RTI Act 2005 and clear violation by PIO.
>> >>> The
>> >>> letter dated 1/5/09 despateched only on 5/5/09 vide ref EP
>> EDB78530060IN
>> >>> from Sansad Marg PO.
>> >>>
>> >>> *Instant appeal filed here *with with following comments and appeal.
>> >>> *A
>> >>> seperate complaint u/s 18 of RTI Act 2005 is being filed with CIC
>> >>> through
>> >>> online for violaiton of provisions of RTI Act 2005 and copy will send
>> to
>> >>> you and PIO in due course.*
>> >>>
>> >>> The Questions, Reply, Comments and appeal as follows:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide the status of email complaints that we have
>> >>> written
>> >>> to your office dated below and their outcome and file notings.
>> >>>
>> >>> *a) *Email [1] dated 3/7/2008 (subject URGENT : NHAI MESS at
>> >>> Mahipalpur flyover),
>> >>>
>> >>> *b) *Email [2]dated 12/12/2007 (Subject: URGENT: NHAI is
>> RESTRICTING
>> >>> entry of Vehicles from Dwarka Link Road?? (Near Shiv Murthy-Sector
>> >>> 22,
>> >>> Dwarka Road)??)
>> >>>
>> >>> *c) *Email [3] dated 13/6/2008 (Subject NHAI is HARASSING DWARKA
>> >>> Residents: Restricting entry No. 19.),
>> >>>
>> >>> *d) *Email [4] dated 12/2/2009, 16/2/2009, 10/3/2009, (Subject
>> >>> Urgent
>> >>> heavy traffic jam on NH8 near Radisson flyover on gurgaon-delhi
>> stretch)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply:: COMBINED ALL (a-d): The concessionaire is improving geometics
>> of
>> >>> U-Turn for traffic going to gurgaon and like to be complete shortly.
>> >>> However, short term measures to improve traffic flow at radison
>> junction
>> >>> is
>> >>> being looked into. As regard to entry of vehcicles from Dwarka link
>> >>> roadis submit athat the reply was sent through emil to you on
>> >>> 9/7/2008
>> >>> on
>> >>> complaint dated 13/6/2008.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Comments: Appeal: The reply was neither confirm with RTI Act .. Point
>> by
>> >>> point answer not provided. The file notings were not provided.
>> >>>
>> >>> Only answer provided to email dated 13/6/08(Point No c).
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply and file notings
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Have the contract agreement with Jaypee-DSC Ventures Ltd and
>> NHAIis
>> >>> published on the
>> >>> NHAI website? If not under what clause/exception the same is
>> >>> excluded.
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply: Not upload on NHAI .
>> >>>
>> >>> *Appeal: The agreement must have uploaded to website under suo moto
>> >>> declaration of Section 4 of RTI Act 2005. Withholding of the
>> >>> agreement
>> >>> from public domain put serious doubts on the transparency.*
>> >>>
>> >>> Please note the recent Indian express News Line report dated
>> >>> 10/5/2009
>> >>> page on of Delhi New Line.
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide the current width of NH-8 from Rajokri Flyover
>> till
>> >>> Palam Airport Junction. (As we understand as per Master Plan 2021
>> the
>> >>> width
>> >>> should be 90 meter).
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply: ROW in Delhi is 60 Mtr.
>> >>> Comments: This confirms with Master Plan 2021 is not abided while
>> >>> constructing Highway on Delhi side.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Flyover/Under pass/Clover Leaf proposed earlier at Link
>> >>> Roadconnecting Dwarka (Opposite Shiv Murthy)/
>> >>>
>> >>> *a) *Kindly provide under what rules/precedence the flyover/under
>> >>> pass at Link Road Connecting Dwarka abolished?
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply: No such information exist.
>> >>>
>> >>> Comments: On one side PIO state no such information on the other
>> >>> side..
>> >>> ref Point No. ( c) enclosed the letter from AAI on the same FLYOVER.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal: The PIO misleads and evade providing complete information.
>> >>>
>> >>> *b) *Please provide the financial benefit for the project on
>> account
>> >>> of non construction of flyover/under pass at the Link Road Junction.
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply: No such information exist.
>> >>>
>> >>> Comments: same as above. The AAI rejection letter confirms the
>> >>> original
>> >>> proposal was there for a flyover. So the amendment to project from
>> >>> original
>> >>> certainly had cost benefit to concessissionairy.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal: The PIO misleads and evade providing complete information.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> *c) *Have NHAI received clearance from AAI for construction of
>> >>> clover leaf at NH-8 vide ref No. AAI/20012/1259/06-ARI dated
>> >>> 14/11/2006
>> >>> AAI/20012/1363/06-ARI dated 17/11/2006 and AAI/20012/1421/06-ARI
>> >>> dated
>> >>> 6/12/2006? If so what specific step/action has taken by NHAI under
>> >>> standard procedure.
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply: Copy of letter d 9/9/2004 from AAI attached
>> >>> Comments : No information provided on above question ref letters of
>> >>> AAI
>> >>> dated in 2006.
>> >>> *Appeal: the information is not provide what Specific step under
>> >>> standard
>> >>> procedure taken by NHAI on above ref 2006 letters of AAI.*
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide under what specific provision prohibited the
>> >>> NHAI
>> >>> to
>> >>> display the helpline and grievance contact on NH-8 stretch of
>> >>> Delhi.
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide the status on uncompleted items as per contract
>> >>> with
>> >>> Jaypee-DSC for NH-8 Express Road (Delhi stretch).
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide under what provision the two wheelers and three
>> >>> wheelers are allowed by NHAI on the NH-8 speed corridor.
>> >>>
>> >>> *a) *If any untoward accidents on account of banned vehicles
>> >>> cause,
>> >>> please provide the name of the officials to be named in the
>> >>> complaint/case
>> >>> as respondent.
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide the complete name of the official responsible
>> >>> for
>> >>> ensuring the smooth flow of traffic on NH-8 and Services roads of
>> >>> Delhi
>> >>> stretch( ie. Mahipalpur area).
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide the name of the official responsible for
>> >>> ensuring
>> >>> the quality of maintenance of NH-8 under Jaypee-DSC contract for
>> >>> Delhi
>> >>> stretch.
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Pleaser provide the name of the officials involved in giving
>> final
>> >>> clearance to NH-8 Express Link (COD)before handing over to Jaypee
>> DSC
>> >>> for
>> >>> operation and public.
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Have the NHAI penalised the Jaypee-DSC for the delay in
>> completing
>> >>> the project ? If not under what exception of the contract
>> clause/rule
>> >>> exempted for penal action?
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> *P R A Y E R*
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> In view of the above the following is humbly prayed:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> (i) Direction may kindly be issued to the Respondent
>> >>> to
>> >>> provide the correct, sufficient and clear information as sought for.
>> >>> Direction may kindly be issue to PIO to provide *Para** wise(point by
>> >>> point)* reply and all relevant information be uploaded to department
>> >>> website for public at large and set example in transparency.
>> >>>
>> >>> (ii) Suitable and STRICT action under Section 20 may please be
>> >>> initiated against the Respondents(PIO’s) for acting against the
>> >>> statutory
>> >>> provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> (ii) Suitable and STRICT appropriate disciplinary action may
>> >>> please
>> >>> be
>> >>> initiated against the Respondents(PIO’s) for acting against the
>> >>> statutory
>> >>> provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> (iii) Any other or further relief which this Hon'ble
>> Authority
>> >>> may deem fit in the interest of the justice under Right to
>> >>> Information
>> >>> Act,
>> >>> 2005.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Rejimon C K
>> >>>
>> >>> Appellant
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:57 PM, REJIMON C K
>> >>> <reji...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *Application Under Right to Information Act 2005*
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * *
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *Rejimon C. K. *
>> >>>> President
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dwarka Forum(Regd)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 453 Nav Sansad Vihar,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Plot 4, Sector 22,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dwarka,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> New Delhi 110075
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 31 March 2009
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Regd AD
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> To:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Central Public Information Officer
>> >>>>
>> >>>> GM-Admin
>> >>>>
>> >>>> National Highway Authority
>> >>>>
>> >>>> G-5-6, Sector 10
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dwarka, New Delhi-75.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> vksh...@nhai.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dear Sir,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *Subject : Application under Right to Information Act. *
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *Ref: NH-8 (From Gurgaon- Delhi) *
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please provide following information under Right to information Act
>> >>>> 2005.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1. Please provide the status of email complaints that we have
>> >>>> written to your office dated below and their outcome and file
>> >>>> notings.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *a) *Email [1] dated 3/7/2008 (subject URGENT : NHAI MESS at
>> >>>> Mahipalpur flyover),
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *b) *Email [2]dated 12/12/2007 (Subject: URGENT: NHAI is
>> >>>> RESTRICTING
>> >>>> entry of Vehicles from Dwarka Link Road?? (Near Shiv Murthy-Sector
>> >>>> 22,
>> >>>> Dwarka Road)??)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *c) *Email [3] dated 13/6/2008 (Subject NHAI is HARASSING DWARKA
>> >>>> Residents: Restricting entry No. 19.),
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *d) *Email [4] dated 12/2/2009, 16/2/2009, 10/3/2009, (Subject
>> >>>> Urgent heavy traffic jam on NH8 near Radisson flyover on
>> >>>> gurgaon-delhi
>> >>>> stretch)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1. Have the contract agreement with Jaypee-DSC Ventures Ltd and
>> >>>> NHAIis published on the
>> >>>> NHAI website? If not under what clause/exception the same is
>> >>>> excluded.
>> >>>> 2. Please provide the current width of NH-8 from Rajokri Flyover
>> >>>> till
>> >>>> Palam Airport Junction. (As we understand as per Master Plan 2021
>> the
>> >>>> width
>> >>>> should be 90 meter).
>> >>>> 3. Flyover/Under pass/Clover Leaf proposed earlier at Link
>> >>>> Roadconnecting Dwarka (Opposite Shiv Murthy)/
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *a) *Kindly provide under what rules/precedence the
>> >>>> flyover/under
>> >>>> pass at Link Road Connecting Dwarka abolished?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *b) *Please provide the financial benefit for the project on
>> >>>> account
>> >>>> of non construction of flyover/under pass at the Link Road Junction.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *c) *Have NHAI received clearance from AAI for construction of
>> >>>> clover leaf at NH-8 vide ref No. AAI/20012/1259/06-ARI dated
>> 14/11/2006
>> >>>> AAI/20012/1363/06-ARI dated 17/11/2006 and
>> AAI/20012/1421/06-ARI dated
>> >>>> 6/12/2006? If so what specific step/action has taken by NHAI under
>> >>>> standard procedure.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1. Please provide under what specific provision prohibited the
>> NHAIto
>> >>>> display the helpline and grievance contact on NH-8 stretch of Delhi.
>> >>>> 2. Please provide the status on uncompleted items as per contract
>> >>>> with Jaypee-DSC for NH-8 Express Road (Delhi stretch).
>> >>>> 3. Please provide under what provision the two wheelers and three
>> >>>> wheelers are allowed by NHAI on the NH-8 speed corridor.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *a) *If any untoward accidents on account of banned vehicles
>> cause,
>> >>>> please provide the name of the officials to be named in the
>> >>>> complaint/case
>> >>>> as respondent.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1. Please provide the complete name of the official responsible
>> >>>> for
>> >>>> ensuring the smooth flow of traffic on NH-8 and Services roads of
>> >>>> Delhi
>> >>>> stretch( ie. Mahipalpur area).
>> >>>> 2. Please provide the name of the official responsible for
>> >>>> ensuring
>> >>>> the quality of maintenance of NH-8 under Jaypee-DSC contract for
>> >>>> Delhi
>> >>>> stretch.
>> >>>> 3. Pleaser provide the name of the officials involved in giving
>> >>>> final
>> >>>> clearance to NH-8 Express Link (COD)before handing over to Jaypee
>> DSC
>> >>>> for
>> >>>> operation and public.
>> >>>> 4. Have the NHAI penalised the Jaypee-DSC for the delay in
>> >>>> completing
>> >>>> the project ? If not under what exception of the contract
>> >>>> clause/rule
>> >>>> exempted for penal action?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please provide the all requested information as above, once the
>> >>>> information is received as per request and as per RTI the inspection
>> of
>> >>>> the records/files will be done in coordination with concerned
>> >>>> departments(please indicate date). If any charges to be paid for
>> >>>> photocopies
>> >>>> kindly mentions the number of pages and amount. If any information
>> >>>> available
>> >>>> on the department website, kindly mention the link in the answers.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I state that the information sought does not fall within the
>> >>>> restrictions
>> >>>> contained in section 8 of the Act and to the best of my knowledge it
>> >>>> pertains to your office.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *If any of the information sought above does not pertain to you,
>> kindly
>> >>>> forward it, under intimation to me, to the respective department
>> >>>> under
>> >>>> section 6(3) of RTI Act 2005 within 5 days receipt of
>> >>>> application.***
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The Answer/information may be provided me through (preferred) by
>> >>>> : reji...@gmail.com or through Department Website with intimation
>> to
>> >>>> undersigned or by mail.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I am enclosing a postal order number 77E 253774* (Issued by Lodhi
>> >>>> RoadPO)
>> >>>> *dated 31-3-2009. I am leaving the payee blank. Kindly fill up the
>> >>>> appropriate name.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanking you,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * *
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *Rejimon C K *
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 9810315897
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> REJIMON C K.
>> >>> Please HELP to save trees and paper - print only if necessary?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> REJIMON C K.
>> >> Please HELP to save trees and paper - print only if necessary?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > REJIMON C K.
>> > Please HELP to save trees and paper - print only if necessary?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > REJIMON C K.
>> > Please HELP to save trees and paper - print only if necessary?
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> REJIMON C K.
>> Please HELP to save trees and paper - print only if necessary?
>>
>>
>> --
>> REJIMON C K.
>> Please HELP to save trees and paper - print only if necessary?
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> REJIMON C K.
> Please HELP to save trees and paper - print only if necessary?
>--
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7
million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened.
source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think
again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
--
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
--
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
--
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .