Re: ENCROACHMENT :SERIOUS ISSUE.. Lets EXPOSE of Chief Engineer Dwarka (Contradicting)- Demand Directions for Policy & Correction & Recover REVENUE LOSS
198 views
Skip to first unread message
Sanjeev Goyal
Mar 10, 2017, 11:36:04 AM3/10/17
to encroachmentreport, DDA Grievance Head, CVO DDA, Vigilance DDA, vc...@dda.org.in, lggc....@nic.in, dwarka-residents
CVO & Grievance Head
Ref: 27/35/2016/AVO-4/CL/1554 dated 08 Mar 2017.
Dear Sir,
In Dwarka encroachment is increasing with speed leading to
obstruction on footpaths in gross violation of several court &
administrative orders. Broadly we can categories these obstructions into 2
categories (i) Hawkers & (ii) Others. The others include pucca
construction, raising walls, fixing sign boards, placing generator sets, constructing
stair cases, ramps, creating wooden structures, flower pots etc. While hawkers
may come & go and DDA has shown sympathy with them the other encroachments
remain there 24 hours so DDA staff cannot say that during inspection they did
not see anything though more than sufficient proofs are available for that. As
per several other replies provided by DDA, the field staff carry out periodic
inspection of respective area. We are not at all able to understand as to despite
inspection AND our regular complaints how these encroachments are increasing
day-by-day. So increasing encroachment confirms that either the staff is
grossly incompetent to hold any post in DDA or there is very well lubricated
system working within DDA to approve these encroachments against bribe. So being
a vigilance officer you must agree either DDA Project Office is captured by all
incompetent officers or there is very well working system exists of bribes. So
please express your opinion about following kind of encroachment on footpaths
(i) Raising wall,
(ii) Raising Staircase,
(iii) Creating Long Ramp,
(iv) Constructing Chabutara,
(v) Placing wooden structure,
(vi) Stocking construction material,
(vii) Keeping generator set,
(viii) Fixing Sign board on footpath,
(ix) Keeping flower pots/drums
Is it a result of bunch of (i) highly careless & incompetent officers or (ii) Highly corrupt officers?
Regards
S K Goyal
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:47 PM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Have Vigilance department ever checked the DDA staff involved in allowing these encroachment,what was the Assets and Values at the time of JOINING DDA and what is the Total Accumulated WEALTH (DISPROPORTIONATE or PROPORTIONATE) with Annual INCOME and after reducing the Annual Expenditure ?Who will give a GUARANTEE that these vendors are not from a MAFIA background or Criminal background, and are backed by some people within DDA establishes them and then later on get RIGHT to that Place in the longer run in return of CASH/KIND or other favours.Tell us these people who own these Chineese van are POOR ? Have you ever got POLICE VERIFICATION or AADHAR verification from the people who actually behind these Chinees vans or other Vendors who made PERMANENT (24 hours 24x7, 365 have full permanent in terms of semi or pucca structure) place on various PUBLIC Land or Public Space ?There are many allotted pltos or even lands and even SHOPS build by DDA as CSC and LSC vacant. WHO STOPPED DDA from allotting them.So in your HONEST JUDGEMENT these are for LIVELIHOOD and the LAW permits why there are contradictory directions from COURTS and INCLUDING from CHAIRMAN DDA AND LG of Delhi ?Mr. Nath,Other vendors comes during the day to earn their livelihood and go back in the evening.12 vendors have permitted by Commissioner (LD) following court ordersThere is no Chinese Food Vending vehicles on footpaths. SoThey also protected under Vendors Act but no permanent encroachment is permitted by this Act.You have made conclusion that not only Dwarka but entire Delhi Vendors are earning LIVELIHOOD in the same way. So in the name of LIVELIHOOD any one can take up public land or space?Ref your letter No. 1554 dated 8/3/2017 in reply to my email dated 8/6/2016Mr. Paras Nath,Dy. Vig Officer
Every 50/100 mtr of entire footpath of Dwarka road has become place for street vendors or boards or some kind of construction both permanent and temporary obstructing safe movement of public. Now where on this LAND of LAW permits OBSTRUCTION OF SAFE MOVEMENT of PEDESTRIAN allowed ? The attached Pictures confirms these gross violations.
i. On 10th Nov 2016, Justices GS Sistani and Vinod Goel made it clear that scheme of the Street Vendors Act, 2014, should not be used to obstruct Roads/Footpaths.ii. In addition allowing the Hawkers/Street vendors on Footpath contradict with direction of LG dated 26 Aug 2015 to Delhi Police. The New LG have tweeted "Task Force to tackle issues of bottlenecks & congestion points and for their removal to be set up. Pedestrian safety to be ensured."
iii. As per Clause 5.10.5 of MPD-2021, provisions for the Informal Trade category can be made in areas like commercial centres, Government and commercial offices etc. In Master Plan Sub-City the Encroachment should not be allowed as Dwarka declared as NO Tolerance Zone towards Encroachment. As per submission by DDA in case WPC(842)/2011 declared Dwarka as No Tolerance Zone.
v. It is increasing day by day.Small shop, khomcha,Narialwala are visible everywhere in Dwarka. Similarly increasing day by day the Boards, permanent encroachment of Huts to Shelters appearing various parts of Dwarka.
vi) from Cigarette Sellers to GUTKA Sellers all are on Road without PROTECTION from DDA DWARKA Engineers on Footpaths and Common Public use area?
vii) Why the area Sub Divisional Magistrate then remove them from Dwarka, if you think they are LEGAL ?
If the DDA Vigilance Wing and DDA Dwarka Engineers are as showing the ONE of the GREATEST people in the world with so much CONCERN for LIVELIHOOD of People. Why the VACANT LANDS be allotted to these vendors instead of GIVING out RENT through PRIVATE CONFIDENTIAL Activity as done by CE Dwarka ?
I hope you are WELL AWARE the DEFINITION of "STREET " in Street Vending ActIf the very purpose of DDA Engineers and Vigilance WING is to give out FREE space, why they are not alloted based on DRAW or application?The division bench judgement of Bombay High Court.
What it say is :
1. Street Vendors Act notified on May 1, 2014 (Protection if any for some one BEFORE this date) There are STREET VIEW MAPS of Dwarka which clearly have evidence whether any VENDOR existed prior to 2014.
2. Cooking/ preparation of food too is allowed (again belief) & various vendor associations/ organisations promoted people to occupy lanes/ streets / public places...
Court say, the term “vending”’ cannot include cooking/ preparation (and only pre packed products can be sold).
So how did your DDA Dwarka staff allowing this? All for FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE ? Th GOOD TRACK record of DDA is well known to all..
Thus the requisite clarity is thrown by High Court...
Its Delh’s turn...
Here again, when MCD got behind cooking vendors, courts told them, if they prepare food items and if there is a quality issue, there is another authority called FSSA and its inspectors to take care !!!Do you have similar agreement that Residents of Dwarka could put their own establishment or engagement on Roads, Footpaths and vacant lands for their LIVELIHOODS ?Who will gurantee these vendors are not sponsored or backed and part of MASTERMIND of some DDA officials ?One side you says these are for LIVELIHOODS and on the other side your CE and others Relaying TILES on replacing life long durable RCC Tiles for the BENEFIT of Contractor and then give out these footpaths for VENDING.. WHAT an IDEA SIR ji.. That why people call DDADELHI DESTRUCTION AUTHORITY (DDA)DWARKA DESTRUCTION AUTHORITY (DDA)These vendors were not there before 2014 February in many place.. How come all this started with a NEW CHIEF ENGINEER and his team started assignment ?Since some of the people involved in allowing these encroachment are about to RETIRE the Vigilance DEPARTMENT is all hurry to give CLEARANCE so that POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS are not HELD UP ?Grievance No. : 201723379
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: dirvigil <dirv...@dda.org.in>
Date: 2017-03-09 15:40 GMT+05:30
Subject: Encroachment serious of expose of Chief Engineer Dwarka
To: rejimonck <reji...@gmail.com>REJIMON C K.On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:46 PM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:Rejimon C KRegardsUnfortunately in DDA NO VIGILANCE system or Anti Corruption to investigate these kind of NEXUS and REVENUE LOSS as well as Public Damage.The CRIMINAL act of these encroachment which evidently proves beyond any doubts supported and protected by DDA officials.In Dwarka every NOOK and CORNER is allotted for Encroachment from Footpaths to Open or Vacant Plots for Cigrette/pan seller to Big builders and Auto Sales Companies etc.The owner also stated that he is an ENGINEER. Do I need to add more?I would request all the concerned authority to take PUNITIVE and DEPARTMENTAL Action against the GROSS ENCROACHMENT across Dwarka.The SDM further enquired how come this Truck was on PUBLIC ROAD (Service Road Portion of Road No. 226). It was very clear from the response of the OWNER that the DDA staff who allowed this.The particular Eating operated from Truck was very next to that plot which CE Dwarka and his staff given out to a Contractor Right opposite to DDA Pocket 1 Sector 23 and on Road No. 226 (Opp to Keshav Kunj).The SDM Dwarka on 2/3/2017 caught RED hand few people Drinking in OPEN near a E-TOUT Mobile Truck fitted Eatery established in CONSPIRACY and CLOSE COLLUSION or NEXUS with DDA Officials at Dwarka.Sir,Further to (F.27(Misc)27/35/2016/AVO-IV/CL)Grievance No. : 201721430REJIMON C K.On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:18 PM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:B) The LPC or the License Property Cell auction others sitesA) How did DDA allowed it occupy when there was TOTAL BAN on encroachment and NO TOLERANCE ZONE declared in Dwarka.4) Policy issues: Why the DDA Dwarka not remove these Chineese CHEF Vans since 2005 where complaint existed.C) The picture dated 31/1/2016 shows this Chef Van Location at T Point of Road No. 226 Opp to Keshav Kunj.2. The DDA reply stated that there is an order of WP(C) 842/2011 dated 30/2/2012 (See below Screen shot of WPC 842/2011)1. DDA Files Appeal in High Court and Supreme Courts in small cases be it RTI Appeal. While in this case NO Review Petition Filed by DDA which obsviously make it National Exchequer Loss. Each peace of Land and space of Land is Worth Crores.SirI am enclosing additional informations.
Number is : DOURD/E/2016/01494
A) NO such order dated 30/2/2012 referred WPC842/2011 caseB) the order dated 30/9/2011 listed only 7 SITES. Then how it become 10 Sites ?C) Who are the petitioners : There are only6 Petitioners. So how come the site become 7 then to 10 ? Is there any one related to DDA /MCD or other department involved?
D) What background check have done by DDA/MCD or Police these people.
- SANDEEP KHURANA ..... Petitioner
- SANDEEP GULATI ..... Petitioner
- HARISH KUMAR WASAON ..... Petitioner
- SHIV KUMAR ..... Petitioner
- PANKAJ MALHOTRA ..... Petitioner
E) Did any antecedents or charector or criminal records were checked?F) Did DDA or MCD checked the Financial background of these 10 People ?G) were they competent or eligible to take a DDA Shop at CSC at Sector 22/23 (Which is lying vacant for last 10 years) at selling rate of DDA around 40 lakh ?3. The picture speaks:B) The address shown in the Chef Van is CSC-I, Sector 22. So how come the FOOTPATH become CSC. Is it a NEW Master Plan Norm?
A) As you may see from the Picture that this chef van operates from 2003.
http://www.dda.org.in/tendernotices_docs/nov08/17th%20License%20Property%20Cell%20-%20Eng.pdf
http://www.dda.org.in/tendernotices_docs/june10/LICENSE%20PROPERTY%20CELL%20Allotment%20of%20Parking%20Sites,%20Kiosks%20and%20Toilet%20Blocks%20of%20DDA%20on%20License%20Fee%20Basis.pdf
http://www.dda.org.in/tendernotices_docs/feb11/Licence%20Property%20Cell%20DDA%20%28English%29.pdf
http://www.dda.org.in/tendernotices_docs/feb11/Licence%20Property%20Cell%20DDA%20%28English%29.pdf
REJIMON C K.On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:31 PM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:4) Again on On 12 Feb 2016 15:31, "SEHQDWK" <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote: "Catering van mention in the complaint was on wrong location which is now removed from this location.3) While the DDA Dwarka claimed it removed the Van, I provided LIVE Picture of evidence that van was still there and my email was responded On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:08 PM, SEHQDWK <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote:1. 1. SDMC issued letter on 14-05-12 showing 10 location to park these catering vans. 2. 2. With reference to hon,ble High Court order dated 30-02-12 in wp(c) 842/2011, DDA was directed to allocate space for the petitioner’s van, accordingly license property cell allocated 10 sites vide letter No. HC/plg(4873)/legal/148 dated 16-03-12.3. 3. Letter from SDMC/Public health Department/Najafgarh Zone date 14-05-12 which shows location for these catering vans. As per this letter Van allocated CSC-I Sector-22 Dwarka.SE (HQ) DWK1) Refer our reporting of ENCROACHMENT ON PEDESTRIAN FOOTPATH FULLY COVERED by a Chineese Chef Van dated 12/5/2015(prior complaint also online)As you may well aware from records of DDA speaks the VOLUME of Public Land where encroached and we helped DDA in regain them and protecting them over the years.Attn: VC DDA & CVOSir,
2) Then finally on On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:14 AM, SEHQDWK <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote: "There was a food selling van on footpath of sector-22. While inspecting it is found that they are having valid paper from SMCD/DDA but location is not correct. Now the Food van is removed from the footpath opf sector-22."SE(HQ)DWK"
5) On 16 April 2016 at 09:25, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote: "Back to square one Sir that Chinese van is back on sec 22 footpath See Get it impounded, not shifting"NOW SHRI. D P SINGH, CHIEF ENGINEER Dwarka Writes ref 2918 dated 2/6/2016 that
" Kiosk were allotted by LPC Branch" "It was situated near SAI Mandir" "Since the Devotte Objected to location as it was selling Non-Veg Items" The Kiosk owner shifted the location to 200 mtr. Now you may see actual Distance and where it is placed in the PHOTOGRAPHS.I have gone through the WPC(842)/2011. THERE IS NO MENTION of Allotment . IF DDA is in position of such High Court ORDER it should display it.As if the DDA Dwarka have respected the court orders. Have a list of Court cases and list of CONTEMPT Cases going on various court speak for itself. Take the example of Garbage/Malba where in Dwarka law student filed case or other case.Did COURT specified which Location to be given for such Vans?Did court specified it should be alloted on PUBLIC LAND and OBSTRUCTING FOOTPATH and ENDANGERING THE SAFETY of LAKHS of Pedestrians(Even after daily news of pedestrians are killed in our country).In the ORDER Dated 30th Sept 2011 THERE IS NO MENTION OF SECTOR 22 Dwarka.What even the ORDER CLEARLY read out that as per Clause 5.10.5 of MPD-2021, provisions for the ?Informal Trade? category can be
made in areas like commercial centers, Government and commercial offices etc.So how come the FOOTPATH become COMMERCIAL CENTRE ?The order poriton also mentions Counsel for respondent No.5/DDA further submits that the area of Dwarka has been declared as Zero Violation Tolerance Area and a task force has been constituted under the directions of the Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, to enforce the aforesaid condition of Zero Violation Tolerance.Is it not usual that the CE IS BRAZEN LIE which now become a TRADITION for him to state that its not UNAUTHORISED ENCROACHMENT.Why DDA not allotted Commercial area still lying vacant in Sector 23 or 22.Why this CHEF VAN ALLOTTED FREE LAND and that to from Public Movement area on BUSY ROAD ?The SE HQ stated that it was on WRONG LOCATION, CE State it is correct Location therfore SE had removed it.What is the ROLE OF LPC who have been allocating PUBLIC SPACE again and again without any POLICY.WILL DDA Allot land for HOMELESS or even those who have HOMES on available land without any norm?So why this SPECIAL TREATMENT to CHEF CARTS ?WHO ARE THE BENEFICIARIES in this.DID DDA formulated as per the COURT order any policy for INFORMAL SECTOR till date ?Why the DDA till date not formulate Tender and CAUSED HUGE REVENUE LOSS for EXCHEQUER ? As the ORDER Dated 30th Sept 2011 clearly stated.
f. It is clarified that the aforesaid arrangement shall be purely temporary in nature and confined to the petitioners herein, as respondent No.5/DDA states that once a policy formulated by it is put into place, it shall be required to follow the normal practice of tendering/auctioning all the remaining sites that would have been identified in its jurisdiction.We could take DDA to Court again.. But we are here for SOLUTION and HELP the nation and let some one to LOOT its resources.I would therefore, request the CVO/VC to add this matter to the list of enquiries.I would request VC and CVO to direct concerned department to formulate policy in compliance with ORDER Dated 30th Sept 2011 without furhter DELAY which cause further loss for the Exchequer.I would request VC to direct the LPC to put all the document under Public Domain as warranted u/s 4 of RTIA 2005.I would request VC to direct the CE/Dwarka to ensure these vans are removed from Footpaths to ensure safety of the pedestrains.I would request the VC to direct the CE & Encroachement removal cell to relocate the Chef Carts to Commercial Land after verificaiton due papers, NOC, permission from all concerned agencies such as DHO(* health FSSAI, FIRE Department, DJB(for Water and Sewer), MCD for other permisions. Delhi police for verificaiton of charector and criminal records of the staffs deputed along with owner. The Income Tax, TDS, Service Tax department suitable records and entry of the business etc.Thanking you,Rejimon C KO R D E RREJIMON C K.Sent over wireless Network ...
https://twitter.com/rejimonck
http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/dhcqrydisp_o.asp?pn=125260&yr=2012
O R D E R
05.07.2012
W.P.(C) 842/2011, W.P.(C) 848/2011, W.P.(C) 949/2011, W.P.(C) 954/2011 and
W.P.(C) 955/2011
1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that no further orders are
required to be passed in the present writ petition and the same may be
disposed of.
2. Accordingly, writ petitions stand disposed of in view of above.
W.P.(C) 842/2011, W.P.(C) 848/2011, W.P.(C) 949/2011, W.P.(C) 954/2011 and
W.P.(C) 955/2011 2/3
CM APPL. 1765/2011 (stay), CM APPL. 9333/2011 (direction by pet.) and CM
APPL. 3350/2012 (by pet. for direction) in W.P.(C) 842/2011
CM APPL. 1778/2011 and CM APPL. 9332/2011 in W.P.(C) 848/2011
CM APPL. 1985/2011 and CM APPL. 9334/2011 in W.P.(C) 949/2011
CM APPL. 1992/2011 and CM APPL. 9285/2011 in W.P.(C) 954/2011
CM APPL. 1994/2011 (STAY) in W.P.(C) 955/2011
3. Applications stand dismissed in view of the order passed in the writ
petitions.
30.09.2011
1. Counsel for respondent No.5/DDA states that an affidavit has been
filed by her on 16.09.2011, in terms of order dated 26.07.2011. It is
stated in the affidavit that DDA has been in correspondence with the MCD
with regard to the operation of catering vans by the petitioners at the
sites in question, which was found to be contrary to the provisions of
MPD-2021 inasmuch as no permission had ever been taken for the said
purpose from DDA, which is the land owning agency. It is further stated
that the reason for refusal to grant NOC for the four sites identified
jointly by Delhi Police, MCD and the petitioners in terms of the earlier
orders passed by this Court, was that the said sites were contrary to the
permitted use as set out in MPD-2021. It is further stated that there is
no prevailing policy regarding location of catering vans/chef carts and
after a meeting held in the Department on 29.07.2011, it was decided that catering vans/chef carts could be accommodated in the category of
?Informal Trade? under MPD-2021, for the reason that a as per Clause
5.10.5 of MPD-2021, provisions for the ?Informal Trade? category can be
made in areas like commercial centers, Government and commercial offices
etc. It is submitted by counsel for respondent No.5/DDA that pending
finalization of a policy for purposes of earmarking and dealing with the
placement of stationary and mobile chef carts/catering vans, some sites
have been identified which are within the commercial centers existing in
Dwarka as mentioned in para-8 of the affidavit. The said sites as
identified by respondent No.5/DDA are as below:
1. CSC, Sector-11, Ph-I, Dwarka
2. LSC, Sector-4, Dwarka,
3. CC, Sector-17, Dwarka,
4. CSC, Sector-12, Dwarka
5. CSC, Pkt. 20-C, (Isolated), Dwarka,
6. CSC, Sector-10, HAF Pkt.-B, Dwarka,
7. CSC, HAF Pkt.-II, Sector-9, Dwarka
2. As for the explanation sought by this Court from respondent No.5/DDA
as to why its officers, who were present in the meeting convened by DCP
Traffic on 14.06.2011, had not raised any objection to the sites
identified for location of chef carts/catering vans in Dwarka, the
submission made on behalf of the respondent/DDA is that the statement of
the Assistant Director (Planning), DDA that there was no provision in
MPD-2021 for location of such facilities as catering vans/chef carts, was
made in the context of locating chef carts/catering vans in the
circulation areas/right of way/road sides which is totally prohibited
under MPD-2021. Counsel for respondent No.5/DDA further submits that the
area of Dwarka has been declared as Zero Violation Tolerance Area and a
task force has been constituted under the directions of the Lieutenant
Governor, Delhi, to enforce the aforesaid condition of Zero Violation
Tolerance.
3. Considering the fact that as per respondent No.5/DDA itself, MPD-2021,
which was gazetted in the year 2007, lays down the manner in which
informal sector units are required to be located under Clause 5.10.5, it
is completely incomprehensible as to why DDA has not thought it fit to
formulate a policy for location of such informal sector units for all
these years. This is all the more surprising when MPD-2021 recognizes
the factum of a large number of units being mobile in nature. Reference
made by the counsel for respondent No.5/DDA to letters addressed in the
year 2010 by her client to the MCD, for cancellation of licenses issued
to catering vans stationed on Master Plan roads of Dwarka, itself goes to
show that DDA being the land owning agency, was well aware of the fact that it was required to put into place a policy for the purposes of
stationing catering vans/chef carts by identifying such locations which
are viable and permissible under MPD-2021 and thereafter, taking steps to
invite tenders from interested parties to park such catering vans/chef
carts at identified sites. For respondent/DDA to have failed to frame
any policy/ guidelines in this regard and then proceeded to complain to
the MCD that being the land owning agency, it had not granted any
permission to MCD for parking of such catering vans at particular sites,
is totally unacceptable. While the officers of DDA were busy issuing
directions to the MCD to submit action taken reports to them, in regard
to cancellation of licenses issued by MCD to catering vans stationed at
Master Plan roads of Dwarka, they remained blissfully oblivious to the
fact that DDA was first required to put its own house in order by having
a policy in place.
4. As on date, four years have passed since MPD-2021 stands notified, but
respondent No.5/DDA has nothing to show for itself by way of policy
guidelines set out for stationing/regulating mobile units like chef
carts/catering vans, subject matter of the present writ petitions.
Instead, DDA appears to have woken up to this realization only after
having been summoned by this Court in the present proceedings, which have
been lingering mainly on account of a dispute between the petitioners and
Government agencies with regard to the stationing of their mobile
catering vans/chef carts at particular locations.
5. Pertinently, this is not the first round of litigation between the
petitioners on the one hand and respondent/MCD and the police department
on the other side. A perusal of the record reveals that the first round
of litigation was initiated by the petitioners in the year 2010 by filing
writ petitions praying inter alia for renewal of their licenses and for
restraining the respondents therein from dispossessing them from the
sites occupied by them at that time. The aforesaid writ petitions came
to be disposed of, vide order dated 07.05.2010, a copy of which is
enclosed with the writ petition as Annexure P-9. In the said order, it
was directed as below:
?Vide order dated 23.3.2010, the Lt. Governor gave directions
to?relocate the present petitioners who have the license to run catering
vans/chef carts. The said directions were given by the Lt. Governor
as??operators of these catering vans/chef carts were creating traffic
congestion?and law and order problems. Now since the MCD has agreed to
relocate these?petitioners and proposed to give some alternative sites,
therefore it is?directed that immediate steps be taken by the MCD to
relocate these petitioners.?As per the counsel for the MCD, the
petitioners after surveying the entire?area, can propose 4-5 sites for
their relocation. After the respondent MCD?takes a decision to relocate
the present petitioners at the proposed site, Delhi Traffic Police may
thereafter issue the necessary ?No Objection Certificate??after taking
into consideration that relocation of the petitioners to the said?sites
does not create any law and order problem and impede the free flow
of?traffic and rights of the pedestrians. It is made clear that the
respondent?police shall not unnecessarily harass the petitioners if they
otherwise fulfill?all the laid down parameters. After ?no objection? is given by the Delhi Traffic Police the license of the?petitioners shall be
renewed by the MCD. The proposed sites shall be suggested?by the
petitioners within a period of three days and decision with regard to?the
proposed sites shall be taken by the respondent MCD within a period of
two?weeks thereafter. So far the no objection by the Delhi Traffic Police
is?concerned, the decision by the Delhi Traffic Police shall be taken
within a?period of two weeks thereafter.
Till the final decision in this regard is taken by the MCD
and?Delhi Traffic Police in terms of the directions given above, the
petitioners?shall continue to operate from the present sites.
This order will remain in operation only till the final decision?is
taken by the said authorities.
With these directions the petitions stand disposed of.?
6. This was followed by an order dated 24.05.2010 passed in the review
applications preferred by the petitioners therein seeking recall of the
aforesaid order dated 07.05.2010. The relevant portion of the aforesaid
order is reproduced hereinbelow:
?Vide orders dated 07.05.2010 detailed directions were given by
this Court for the relocation of the present petitioners from the present
site to some other place to be suggested by the petitioners and the Delhi
Traffic Police shall issue ?No Objection Certificate? after taking into
consideration that relocation of the petitioners do not create any law
and order problem and impede the free flow of traffic and rights of the
pedestrians. Now by this application moved by the petitioners the stand
taken is that their present site do not cause any traffic congestion
which can impede the free flow of traffic or create any law and order
problem or there are any complaints from the residents of the society or
the neighbourhood complaining against the present petitioners. Let the
aforesaid facts be verified by the Delhi Traffic Police before taking any
final decision for granting ?No Objection Certificate? to the alternative
sites to be suggested by the petitioners. The Delhi Traffic Police shall
also examine the feasibility of the present sites in accordance with the
laid down guidelines and the parameters of the traffic police. The time
schedule as directed in the order dated 7.5.2010 shall now commence from
this date of order.
With the above directions the present application is disposed of.?
7. Counsel for the petitioners state that the need to file the present
petitions arose on account of the fact that the petitioners were served
with an order dated 07.01.2011 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of
Police, Traffic (Headquarter) stating inter alia that pursuant to the
order dated 24.5.2010 passed in the review applications filed by them,
the area traffic officers had surveyed the existing sites of the
petitioners in Dwarka and had found that the said sites were not feasible
inasmuch as parking of their catering vans there was causing traffic
congestion as also endangering the road safety of the passerbys. The
said order dated 7.1.2011 directed the petitioners to propose alternate
sites within three days to the respondent/MCD, whereafter MCD was
required to take a decision within a period of two weeks with regard to
the proposed sites. A perusal of the prayers made in the present
petition shows that the petitioners have also sought directions to the
respondents for release of their vehicles which were impounded by MCD,
and further, for directions that they be permitted to operate their
catering vans from their present sites.
8. The aspect of grant of interim relief to the petitioners was
considered in the order dated 15.02.2011, wherein the submissions of the
counsel for the respondent/Delhi Police was recorded to the effect that
since the petitioners had not proposed alternative sites as directed in
the orders dated 07.05.2010 and 24.05.2010 passed in the earlier batch of
matters within the time prescribed in those orders, they had forfeited
their right to do so. It was thereafter observed that the impugned order
dated 07.01.2011 could not be faulted in the absence of any error having
been pointed out by the petitioners in the decision making process. It
was further observed that the petitioners having failed to act in terms
of the orders passed in the earlier writ petitions, would not be entitled
to any interim relief at that stage.
9. After passing of the aforesaid order, came the order dated 27.05.2011
wherein a joint meeting was directed to be held between Deputy
Commissioner (Traffic), Delhi Police, Deputy Municipal Health Officer,
MCD and the petitioners to resolve the issue of identification of
acceptable sites for parking of catering vans belonging to the
petitioners within the area of Dwarka. On 7.7.2011, minutes of the
meeting held on 14.06.2011 were placed on record, and it was jointly
stated by the parties that sites for allocation to the petitioners were
identified but the same could be granted only upon obtaining a No
Objection Certificate from DDA. It may be noted that till then, DDA had
not been impleaded as a respondent in the present proceedings, but it was
duly represented through its Deputy Directors in the aforesaid meeting.
Having regard to the fact that DDA was the land owning agency, this Court
directed the petitioners to implead the said authority as a co-respondent
in the present proceedings and further directions were issued to the DDA
that in case an NOC was not furnished by it in terms of the decision
taken in the meeting held on 14.06.2011, the reason therefor shall be
furnished. It is in this background that the aforesaid affidavit has
been filed by respondent No.5/DDA wherein it is stated that it is not in
a position to give an NOC for the sites identified in the joint meeting
for the reason that it has no policy in place for allocating sites in its
jurisdiction for the purpose of stationing/parking of such chef
carts/catering vans.
10. As counsel for the respondent/DDA states, on instructions from her
clients, that the policy making process shall be initiated at the
earliest and a policy in that regard is likely to be formulated within a
period of three months, respondent No.5/DDA is directed to file an
affidavit placing on record such a policy once formulated by it, within
three months, with copies to all the parties.
11. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioners that except the
petitioners in W.P.(C) No.954/2011, all the remaining petitioners have
already approached the respondent/MCD and got their catering vans
released upon payment of penalty as demanded by the said agency, but
without prejudice to their respective rights and contentions. He,
however, concedes that as on date, none of the petitioners have been
issued a license by the respondent/MCD in view of the on going
disagreement between the government agencies with regard to the exact
location of the sites for stationing of their chef carts/catering vans.
Counsel for the respondent/MCD adds that till an NOC is granted by the
DCP Traffic and other formalities are completed as per MCD?s rules in
that regard, the question of granting licenses to the petitioners does
not arise.
12. Now that respondent No.5/DDA has decided to jump into the fray so
belatedly by waking up to its right to formulate a policy in respect of
the land owned by it for the purpose of allocation of sites for
stationing/parking of catering vans/chef carts and further, in view of
the submission made by the counsel for the respondent/DDA that this
process will take at least 3 months time and in the interregnum, it is
willing to allocate sites to the petitioners for stationing of their
catering vans/chef carts in Dwarka, the following directions are issued:
a. Respondent/DDA shall file a brief affidavit within two weeks
specifying the most populated commercial center from amongst the eight
centers enumerated by it in para-8 of its affidavit. The aforesaid
affidavit to be filed by respondent No.5/DDA is considered necessary in
the light of the submission made by the counsel for the petitioners that
the current rate of occupancy in the aforesaid 8 commercial centers is
not more than 20% which would translate into very meager footfalls for
the petitioners to break even in their commercial venture.
b. Along with the affidavit to be filed, respondent No.5/DDA shall
mention the exact locations where the petitioners are expected to park
their catering vans. The affidavit shall also indicate the tentative
amount towards licence fees, if any, expected to be deposited by the
petitioners.
c. The aforesaid affidavit shall be handed over to the counsel for the
petitioners within two weeks, whereupon, counsel for the petitioners
shall obtain instructions from his clients as to the acceptability of the
identified locations.
d. As counsel for the petitioners asserts that there are far more
populated community centers/commercial districts in Dwarka Distt. which
have deliberately not been revealed by respondent No.5/DDA in its affidavit, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file an affidavit,
specifying such other commercial centers in Dwarka. Needful shall be
done within two weeks with a copy to the counsel for respondent No.5/DDA,
for her to obtain necessary instructions before the next date of hearing.
e. It is also directed that to obviate any further delay in finalizing
the sites for relocation of the petitioners, without prejudice to the
final policy that may be formulated ultimately by respondent No.5/DDA,
this time, the DDA shall take the initiative to have the sites as
identified by it for allocation to the petitioners, cleared by both, MCD
and the Delhi Police.
f. It is clarified that the aforesaid arrangement shall be purely
temporary in nature and confined to the petitioners herein, as respondent
No.5/DDA states that once a policy formulated by it is put into place, it
shall be required to follow the normal practice of tendering/auctioning
all the remaining sites that would have been identified in its
jurisdiction.
13. List on 20.10.2011.
Dasti to the parties.
HIMA KOHLI,J
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:39 PM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:Still this encroachment not removed
On 16 Apr 2016 16:57, "Ramandeep Mann" <ramanm...@gmail.com> wrote:Sir,We cannot understand, that how come the new location of the "Chinese Fast food Van" is not a encroachment, when it is encroaching the sec-22,footpath,Dwarka,New Delhi-77.Please remove the the said "Chinese Fast food Van", which is encroaching on the sec-22 Foot pathRegards,Ramandeep Singh Mann,On 16 April 2016 at 09:25, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:Back to square one
Sir that Chinese van is back on sec 22 footpath
SeeGet it impounded, not shifting
On 12 Feb 2016 15:31, "SEHQDWK" <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote:Catering van mention in the complaint was on wrong location which is now removed from this location.SE(HQ)DWKSent: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:28:36
To: SEHQDWK <enc...@dda.org.in>, encroachmentreport <encroachm...@dda.org.in>, DDA Grievance Head <sagr...@gmail.com>, vcdda <vc...@dda.org.in>, CVO DDA <c...@dda.org.in>
Cc: ads bsds <enc...@dda.org.in>, Ramandeep Mann <ramanm...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?Mere desh mahan...3. We dont know how the Court allowed on the one side DHC only asked to remove all the encroachments on the other side give permissions. Look at the cost of the shop in sector 22 DDA Market it is as per info not less than 50 Lakh, while this Chineese van get the equal space for FREE thanks to LPC and other authorities. I recall DDA demolished the CCTV room of Delhi Police in sector 6 market stating it was encroachment.2. Now the question the Role of NOTORIOUS - License Property Cell(LPC) of DDA. They are known for CORRUPTION and allotting public land for peanut price as happened in other cases such as Mobile Towers. Why don't LPC issue license to build TOILET in Dwarka ? why Don't LPC issue permission to build KioSK for Fruits and Vegetables or Vegetable markets? The Annual Asset Report for 2014 and 2015 may be scruitnised to see the VOLUME of INCREASE in Cash or Kind receipt if any by LPC staffs and their Moveble and immoveble assets increased or not. I don't know the CVO will look into this??1. If the allocated space for the License (Will deal separately whether the LPC action Valid or not) was at Sector 22 DDA Market. Instead of allotted location the licensee have been parking at Sector 21 T Point opposite to Sector 21 Metro station, initially on the corner Plot which now put boundary wall then on the footpaths blocking. Why not SE HQ Dwarka initiate cancellation of the allotment on this breach. The previous JE/AE/EE/SE should have actually done this. May be they had some kind of understanding with this particular Chinese van?The matter revealed the gross violation of all rules existing.Thank you SE Saab,highly appreciate your response.Thank you Mr. SE, Hope the cacellation recommendation be written to DC SDMC Najafgarh and LPC at the earliest with a copy to us.REJIMON C K.Sent over wireless Network ...
https://twitter.com/rejimonck
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:08 PM, SEHQDWK <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote:1. 1. SDMC issued letter on 14-05-12 showing 10 location to park these catering vans.
2. 2. With reference to hon,ble High Court order dated 30-02-12 in wp(c) 842/2011, DDA was directed to allocate space for the petitioner’s van, accordingly license property cell allocated 10 sites vide letter No. HC/plg(4873)/legal/148 dated 16-03-12.
3. 3. Letter from SDMC/Public health Department/Najafgarh Zone date 14-05-12 which shows location for these catering vans. As per this letter Van allocated CSC-I Sector-22 Dwarka.
SE (HQ) DWK
From: ads bsds <enc...@dda.org.in>
Sent: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:26:34
To: "enccedw " <enc...@dda.org.in>
Subject: Fw: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
From: REJIMON C K reji...@gmail.com
Sent: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:20:13 +0530
To: SEHQDWK enc...@dda.org.in
Cc: encroachmentreport encroachm...@dda.org.in, sd...@googlegroups.com, EnC DDA EO ads bsds enc...@dda.org.in
Subject: Re: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
Dear SE Saab
You said the encroachment removed.
See the live picture taken few seconds before.
How come.
Also see another permanent structure tea stall coming up.
Hope redress it.
On 29 Jan 2016 10:31, "REJIMON C K" <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:Look forward ZERO TOLERANCE Dwarka.Mr. SE HQ, we all will be with you to remove ANY ENCROACHMENT on ground. Recent SC, HC, NGT, LG and other orders backing you to take action.3. If the SDMC had issued, please share we will raise it with SDMC as on what ground they have right to issue permission on DDA is the Land and Road Owning Agency. The SDMC NGZ simply deny to install public urinal or even bins on roads stating that Roads are not under them. Now for these permission how can they issue such permissions? I hope your department will also need to write to them.2. If DDA had issued a document, appreciate if you could share that with us.1. How did SDMC issued papers to some of these people to operate from PUBLIC LAND.. Does the land or area mean for Public is for COMMERCIAL purpose ? Yes you have at least 30 shops lying vacant in sector 22 and 23 DDA Markets.. Why not these guys take that ?Mr. SE (HQ)Thank you very much , we really appreciate that if the action taken on this regard.
REJIMON C K.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:14 AM, SEHQDWK <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote:
There was a food selling van on footpath of sector-22. While inspecting it is found that they are having valid paper from SMCD/DDA but location is not correct. Now the Food van is removed from the footpath opf sector-22.
SE (HQ) DWK
From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 10:10:18
To: SEHQDWK <enc...@dda.org.in>
Cc: encroachm...@dda.org.in, enc...@dda.org.in, vcdda <vc...@dda.org.in>, DDA Nodel Officer <nodda...@nic.in>, LG Cell <lggc....@nic.in>, Dwarka-residents@googlegroup.com, sd...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
What true lie
You don't considered this as seen on 1/1/2016 & been there for months, is it encroachment? Mr SE HQ Dwarka?Please give back our footpath s
On 30 Dec 2015 10:13, "SEHQDWK" <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote:There is no encroachment as the portion for providing slip road required for the junction of 30 metre road with road No. 210 at sector-22, is already seperated by providing boundary wall by transport department.
SE(HQ)DWK
From: "ads bsds"enc...@dda.org.in
Sent: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:42:13 +0530
To: "enc...@dda.org.in" enc...@dda.org.in
Subject: Fw: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
>
>From: encroachment report <encroachm...@dda.org.in>
>Sent: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:18:00
>To: "enceo3 " <enc...@dda.org.in>
>Subject: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
>Please send ATR directly to the complainant by email or by letter if complainant’s Email ID is not available, under intimation to this office by Email only at - encroachm...@dda.org.in.
>
>
>
>
>From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
>Sent: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 20:10:46
>To: encroachm...@dda.org.in
>Subject: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
>
Shobhit Chauhan
Mar 11, 2017, 4:34:30 AM3/11/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com, encroachmentreport, DDA Grievance Head, CVO DDA, Vigilance DDA, vc...@dda.org.in, LG Cell, CE Dwarka Offc
Greetings!
If the Vigilance department of DDA wants us the citizens to go on roads and provide evidences, we can do that even though its not the right to do.
If the Vigilance department of DDA wants us the citizens to go on roads and provide evidences, we can do that even though its not the right to do.
Almost all intersections have been encroached upon. Whether permanent or temporary, encroachment is encroachment. I am surprised to read the contents of the letter by Shri Paras Nath of Vigilance department. What does he mean by saying that those vendors go away at night! This is pretty obvious. Vendors do their business when people are moving around. That clearly means that the Vigilance department of DDA is openly supporting encroachment?! If this is the approach of a vigilance department official then why so much hue and cry over the issue of vendors all across upto Parliament and courts? Let the DDA vigilance department give a License to all vendors who have become a nuisance for all of us... We have many mini markets across Dwarka which cause a lot of inconvenience to all of us and also are leading to a lot of obstruction in free movement on public roads.
This matter is serious and needs to taken up at appropriate court of law and let the DDA Dwarka officials and Vigilance DDA repeat their words (in the letter in trailing mail) in the court.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shobhit Chauhan
RTI Activist
Founder President: Ek Sangharsh (Regd. NGO)
Mobile: 0-9717063875
E-mail: chauhans...@gmail.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/chauhanshobhit24
Twitter: www.twitter.com/chauhanshobhit
P Print only if absolutely necessary
*Disclaimer:*
This Email message along with any attachments is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential/ privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message from your system. If the reader is not the intended recipient then any dissemination, distribution or copy of this
communication is strictly prohibited. Reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that this message is virus-free. Shobhit Chauhan does not accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this message or attachments.
--
Membership Application- Please visit...
We are Live on https://twitter.com/dwarkaforum
We are on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Dwarkaforum
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dwarka-residents.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Arun Banerjee
Mar 11, 2017, 9:00:29 PM3/11/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Many juice vendors in the evening hours serve as drinking spots of hard liquor. They also need to be removed and stopped after Sun set.
R. Dua
Mar 11, 2017, 9:01:37 PM3/11/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Well written Sh Shobhit ji.
Only one point to add here.
The patri walas are NOT going away at night from the footpaths.
They and their family are having cots and are there on the footpaths 24/7.
Personally one has nothing against these footpath usurper s but one can not walk on the footpath as it becomes their home.
We had one Mohhamedan coconut seller opposite Prayagjotishpur cghs. Now another Mohammedan has set up a coconut patri opposite HMM cghs which is just 50 feet away. With cots and kambals.
I stepped out to put diya this morning and the fellow was sitting and doing his business.
We Dwarkaites just want to live in respectful surrounding s.
I hope we are not asking too much.
Regards.
Krishna Singh
Mar 12, 2017, 3:54:56 AM3/12/17
to DWARKA FORUM (Regd)
Dear Mr. Dua
It would have been better if uou just had told coconut seller only. Not sure why you brought religion in all this.
It would have been better if uou just had told coconut seller only. Not sure why you brought religion in all this.
Why we r expecting dda to do. In society there are illegal extension no livelihood no vendor protection act but still dda dont do anything. I raised on encroahment link of dda but as usual no action.
System is lacking what prevents from vendors on all roads all spot. Not sure if any these vendors pay to mcd system i know for sure they pay good amount to everyone thats why they dont want to stop their monthly income plan by removing them.
Krishna
Shobhit Chauhan
Mar 12, 2017, 7:54:25 AM3/12/17
to DWARKA FORUM (Regd)
May I request all members reading this mail to send me pics of vendors around their societies or elsewhere. It would be a great help.
Mail me at chauhans...@gmail.com
WhatsApp at 09717063875
Regards.
Sent via Outlook on Mobile Device
Dear Mr. Dua It would have been better if uou just had told coconut seller only. Not sure why you brought religion in all this. Why we r expecting dda to do. In society there are illegal extension no livelihood no vendor protection act but still dda dont do anything. I raised on encroahment link of dda but as usual no action. System is lacking what prevents from vendors on all roads all spot. Not sure if any these vendors pay to mcd system i know for sure they pay good amount to everyone thats why they dont want to stop their monthly income plan by removing them. Krishna -- Membership Application- Please visit... We are Live on https://twitter.com/dwarkaforum
We are on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Dwarkaforum
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residen...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dwarka-residents. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Viney Tyagi
Mar 12, 2017, 7:57:22 AM3/12/17
to dwarka-residents, DDA Grievance Head, lggc....@nic.in, vc...@dda.org.in, Vigilance DDA, encroachmentreport, CVO DDA
--
Membership Application- Please visit...
We are Live on https://twitter.com/dwarkaforum
We are on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Dwarkaforum
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Viney Tyagi
Mar 12, 2017, 7:57:53 AM3/12/17
to dwarka-residents, DDA Grievance Head, lggc....@nic.in, vc...@dda.org.in, Vigilance DDA, encroachmentreport, CVO DDA
Encroachments by car repair workshop outside BP petrol pump sector 11. More than 20 immovable cars are there.
On 10 Mar 2017 10:06 pm, "Sanjeev Goyal" <cwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
R. Dua
Mar 12, 2017, 7:59:20 AM3/12/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Sir,
You are right.
I apologise for mentioning the religion of coconut seller.
The reason I did so was to say that if we allow one encroachment on a footpath, there is another encroachment of same a few days later.
This is an endemic problem which needs resolution.
Regards.
REJIMON C K
Mar 14, 2017, 5:05:41 AM3/14/17
to DWARKA FORUM, MUD Minister Naidu Offic, Minister Urban, DDA Grievance Head, LG Cell, vcdda, Vigilance DDA, encroachmentreport, CVO DDA
Does Mr. Vigilant (VIGILANCE ) officer give same agreement to LUTYENs Delhi to have ENCROACHMENT as allowed in Dwarka ?
IF this is the policy then why dont the Entry/Exit of RACE Course Metro Station right opposite to Minister Urban Mr. Naidu for Hawking ?I am sure he will not
R. Dua
Mar 14, 2017, 12:10:26 PM3/14/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Very right Sh Reji ji.
I was thinking on the same point.
If authorties want they can remove encroachment s in no time.
The encroachments are no state secret,that if only we disclose the encrochers will Authorities know of them.
We are watching our city becoming a encroachers paradise.
Sh Goyal ji's work will come in handy to expose the lacunae.
Regards to all.
ashok dua
Mar 15, 2017, 8:15:41 AM3/15/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com, MUD Minister Naidu Offic, Minister Urban, DDA Grievance Head, LG Cell, vcdda, Vigilance DDA, encroachmentreport, CVO DDA
This in-arguably is against the principle of SABKA VIKAS which must also be on an equitable basis irrespective of the status of the person or the locality.
Ashok Dua
To: DWARKA FORUM <dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com>; MUD Minister Naidu Offic <office...@gmail.com>; Minister Urban <Minist...@nic.in>
Cc: DDA Grievance Head <sagr...@gmail.com>; LG Cell <lggc....@nic.in>; vcdda <vc...@dda.org.in>; Vigilance DDA <dirv...@dda.org.in>; encroachmentreport <encroachm...@dda.org.in>; CVO DDA <c...@dda.org.in>
Sent: Tuesday, 14 March 2017 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Dwarka Forum-2017] Re: ENCROACHMENT :SERIOUS ISSUE.. Lets EXPOSE of Chief Engineer Dwarka (Contradicting)- Demand Directions for Policy & Correct
Cc: DDA Grievance Head <sagr...@gmail.com>; LG Cell <lggc....@nic.in>; vcdda <vc...@dda.org.in>; Vigilance DDA <dirv...@dda.org.in>; encroachmentreport <encroachm...@dda.org.in>; CVO DDA <c...@dda.org.in>
Sent: Tuesday, 14 March 2017 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Dwarka Forum-2017] Re: ENCROACHMENT :SERIOUS ISSUE.. Lets EXPOSE of Chief Engineer Dwarka (Contradicting)- Demand Directions for Policy & Correct
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residen...@googlegroups.com.
R. Dua
Mar 15, 2017, 12:00:58 PM3/15/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Sirs,
If I may submit in my very limited capacity of understanding Encroachment issues.
There seems to a hand of local politicians in encouraging these encrochments.
For the last year or so we have observed the brazeness with which these pavement encroachers stay and have proliferated.
There is a political hand.
And all for a handful of votes.
But thats how Slum Lords are made.
Regards to all.
On 15 Mar 2017 17:45, "'ashok dua' via DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" <dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
This in-arguably is against the principle of SABKA VIKAS which must also be on an equitable basis irrespective of the status of the person or the locality.Ashok Dua
To: DWARKA FORUM <dwarka-residents@googlegroups.com>; MUD Minister Naidu Offic <office...@gmail.com>; Minister Urban <Minist...@nic.in>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dwarka-residents.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Membership Application- Please visit...
We are Live on https://twitter.com/dwarkaforum
We are on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Dwarkaforum
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
REJIMON C K
Mar 29, 2017, 2:11:22 AM3/29/17
to DWARKA FORUM, sd...@googlegroups.com, SDMC Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner Najafgarh Zone, ce...@dda.org.in, CVO DDA, Vigilance DDA, LG Delhi Email
LG Says. "Road owning agencies to be responsible for repair & maintenance of roads and for keeping them encroachment free. (2/n)"
CE Dwarka and Vigilance DDA says it is allowed as its LIVELIHOOD. We all pretty aware whose LIVELIHOOD will be affected if Encroachments are Removed ?Am I Right Mr. PARAS Nath and Mr. D P Singh ?
REJIMON C K
Aug 17, 2017, 8:03:21 AM8/17/17
to DWARKA FORUM, sd...@googlegroups.com
Another interesting Reply from Vigilance Department of DDA on encroachment
The attached reply by DVO IV the ACCUSED Vigilance Officer in response dated 5303 dated 4/8/2017 this was addressed to DD (SA &GR)
The ACCUSED DVO IV now claims that he replied vide Letter No. 1554 dated 8/3/2017 based on Then CE Dwarka Reports. This is after over FIVE Months.
Also note the INSTRUCTION below by the DVO IV to III to DELETE THE COMPLAINT. SUCH BRAZEN and BLATANT IMMORAL and UNETHICAL ACT of DELETING the COMPLAINT from Portal by DVO IV is nothing but expose the entire web of systematic CORRUPTION, ENCROACHMENT are Supported, AIDED and in COLLUSION and NEXUS with CVO, DDA Office Only.
The attached reply by DVO IV the ACCUSED Vigilance Officer in response dated 5303 dated 4/8/2017 this was addressed to DD (SA &GR)
The ACCUSED DVO IV now claims that he replied vide Letter No. 1554 dated 8/3/2017 based on Then CE Dwarka Reports. This is after over FIVE Months.
Also note the INSTRUCTION below by the DVO IV to III to DELETE THE COMPLAINT. SUCH BRAZEN and BLATANT IMMORAL and UNETHICAL ACT of DELETING the COMPLAINT from Portal by DVO IV is nothing but expose the entire web of systematic CORRUPTION, ENCROACHMENT are Supported, AIDED and in COLLUSION and NEXUS with CVO, DDA Office Only.
Shobhit Chauhan
Aug 17, 2017, 11:56:33 AM8/17/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
If the matter is still continuing at the CE(Dwarka) level, why was clearance given to the previous CE (Dwarka)? Did he get the encroachments cleared? What action he take to get the clearance from Vigilance department.
Rejimon sir, I am again telling you. Unless we get together and get them booked through the court - they will keep us entangled with letters from one office to another. Lets sit together and compile all issues with evidences and seek directions from the court. What kind of vigilance department is this where the complainant's views are not considered and the Vigilance department makes its opinion and final decision based on the reply of the accused himself.
This recorded corrupt Vigilance Officer Paras Nath needs to be taken to task.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shobhit Chauhan
RTI Activist
Founder President: Ek Sangharsh (Regd. NGO)
Mobile: 0-9717063875
E-mail: chauhans...@gmail.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/chauhanshobhit24
Twitter: www.twitter.com/chauhanshobhit
P Print only if absolutely necessary
*Disclaimer:*
This Email message along with any attachments is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential/ privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message from your system. If the reader is not the intended recipient then any dissemination, distribution or copy of this
communication is strictly prohibited. Reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that this message is virus-free. Shobhit Chauhan does not accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this message or attachments.
REJIMON C K
Aug 18, 2017, 7:04:15 AM8/18/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
I agree
Need to find some time to fix this using info received.
Arun Banerjee
Aug 19, 2017, 2:06:29 AM8/19/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
If the present officials at vigilance section and department are long timers they need to be transferred immediately. Rather all long timers need to be transferred.
Dwarka Express
Aug 21, 2017, 1:36:39 AM8/21/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Dear Friends,
The Delhi High Court in LPA 80/2016 has ordered that no shopkeeper will not encroach upon public land or verandah and will not extend their shop.The court directed statutory bodies to take strict action against the offenders but still the encroachment by shopkeepers continues. The same law is applicable in other market's also but the statutory bodies are protecting the encroachers.
I request to enlightened citizens of Dwarka to file a contempt case against shopkeepers,DDA,Delhi police & SDMC for violating Delhi High Court orders in LPA 80/2016 & citing the orders the case for removal encroachment may be filed in entire Dwarka.
I am of the view that only the court can ensure proper working of irresponsible officials.
Regards Robin
Dwarka Express
Arun Banerjee
Aug 21, 2017, 1:36:54 AM8/21/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Encroachment is a perennial problem and has seeped down to the root of the system. For this past officials should also be held responsible for whom such offence is being carried on for years together.
Until some exemplary punishment is given to the officials and encroachers this is not going to end. Also leniency of the officials encourages others to follow the suit and slowly it becomes a chronic problem and ultimately goes out of control and hands of the authorities.
Strict action by authorities without any political interference is the last resort. Also officials who dare to remove encroachments needs to be rewarded in social function and by the Departments.
Arun Banerjee
অরূণ ব্যানার্জী
αrun βanerjee
Dwarka
Use email save tree,
Save electricity and potable water.
SAVE THE EARTH
Surjit Chetal
Aug 21, 2017, 8:27:14 AM8/21/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Approach suggested by Mr Chauhan will be more effective.this kind of encroachment will make swach Bharat mission a failure.Somehow if media can be involved it will work out well
Grt efforts !!👍👍
Sanjeev Goyal
Aug 24, 2017, 11:27:02 AM8/24/17
to vc...@dda.org.in, dwarka-residents, ce...@dda.org.in
Dear Sir,
In sector 12 Dwarka, City Center Mall has engulfed the adjoining footpath and encroached it leaving no space for pedestrians to move. Despite our repeated complaints to DDA civil wing & to vigilance there is no action. It is evident that whole field staff, their supervisors and all vigilance staff is ‘SOLD’ in the hands of mall authority.
Request you to direct Chief Engineer Dwarka to take action and direct staff to remove encroachment. Also also to take action against staff which allowed such rampant encroachment.
Regards
S K Goyal
Krishna Singh
Aug 24, 2017, 11:32:41 AM8/24/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com, vc...@dda.org.in, ce...@dda.org.in
problem is govt servant dont do their duty for reasons known to everyone. even if this encroachment is fixed where is punishment. its like rewarding criminals to enjoy till it stops.. why govt shud not seal whole complex for a month to set example that dont do bad thing.
anyway no expectations from DDA so just ignore as one of many emails from hopeless citizen.
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/dwarka-residents/s_WYGwGptTg/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to dwarka-residents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Shobhit Chauhan
Aug 27, 2017, 5:16:48 AM8/27/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Sanjeev ji
My RTI and subsequent FA is pending on this matter. If response is not received, am prepared to issue notice u/s 80 CPC to the Secretary, MoUD on this rampant encroachment in broad day light.
Am also filing a complaint with traffic police for parking on main road outside the said mall.
In all, we have to do our documentation well so as to ultimately get DDA to court.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shobhit Chauhan
RTI Activist
Founder President: Ek Sangharsh (Regd. NGO)
Mobile: 0-9717063875
E-mail: chauhans...@gmail.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/chauhanshobhit24
Twitter: www.twitter.com/chauhanshobhit
P Print only if absolutely necessary
*Disclaimer:*
This Email message along with any attachments is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential/ privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message from your system. If the reader is not the intended recipient then any dissemination, distribution or copy of this
communication is strictly prohibited. Reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that this message is virus-free. Shobhit Chauhan does not accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this message or attachments.
Sudhanshu Bounthiyal
Aug 27, 2017, 5:17:20 AM8/27/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com, vc...@dda.org.in, ce...@dda.org.in
Dear All,
High Court Order on sector 6 market was specially against patriwalas which police and DDA has removed to good extent , there are few shopkeepers who were sheltering encroachers for there benefits
Since Order has come against there interest and now they are working against interest of Market shopkeepers
Sudhanshu Bounthiyal
Aug 27, 2017, 5:35:14 AM8/27/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com, vc...@dda.org.in, ce...@dda.org.in
Though I appreciate Police efforts in Removal of encroachment and Dwarka Forum and SH. Rejimon sir for constatnt follow ups , i would like to bring to notice of DDA and Poilce that some patriwalas
despite court orders come back and encroach , periodic inspection by DDA and police is requested in this regards
for Example this Juice stall (Next to Bikaner Shop)is still in market despite court Orders.
Dwarka Express
Aug 27, 2017, 12:25:03 PM8/27/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Mr.Sudhanshu,
The Delhi High Court has passed an order in favour of juice stall near Bikaner Sweets.The juice stall vendor is authorised by DDA,SDMC & now by order of Delhi High Court.
The Delhi High Court had never passed an order against vendors but it has specifically mentioned that " no shopkeeper will encroach upon public land & verandah". Kindly refer to pg 17 ,para 19 of LPA 80/2016 Delhi High Court.The Delhi High Court & Supreme court have asked vendors to plead their case in front of TVC & appropriate authority.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Sudhanshu Bounthiyal <sudhanshu.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
Though I appreciate Police efforts in Removal of encroachment and Dwarka Forum and SH. Rejimon sir for constatnt follow ups , i would like to bring to notice of DDA and Poilce that some patriwalasdespite court orders come back and encroach , periodic inspection by DDA and police is requested in this regardsfor Example this Juice stall (Next to Bikaner Shop)is still in market despite court Orders.
Shobhit Chauhan
Sep 1, 2017, 6:55:43 AM9/1/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Its Page 19 and Para 17 in the LPA 80/2016 (Attached for members to go through it.).
The referred judgement says that "We also direct the statutory bodies to ensure that none of the shopkeepers
encroach upon verandahs or public land. Counsel for
respondent no. 6 also undertakes to the court that none of the members
of the respondent no. 6 association will permit any shop keeper or any
member of the association to encroach upon public land, extend their
shops or encroach upon verandahs or public land. The statutory bodies are directed to take strict action in case of violation of this
undertaking."
We need to read the hon'ble court's order very carefully. Para 17 was the last para of the judgement where the Hon'ble Justice made additional comments regarding encroachment by shopkeepers. In the previous 16 paras, the hon'ble court had already established that the vendors produced false and fabricated documents to seek directions of protection under Section 3 (3) of
the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street
Vending) Act, 2014. The hon'ble court rejected the petition and ordered that protection under Section 3(3) of the Act can not be seeked.
In view of the above, no hawking is allowed anywhere in Sector 6 Dwarka and similarly in entire Dwarka. Also, the shopkeepers are not allowed to encroach upon any public land.
Only ground floor is little better. All floors above are a complete mess. One day some fire would erupt and it would be a scary scene. It looks like the market is decades old. Its time our political agents stop interfering and let the law take its course, else we should remember these days Babas are having a bad time. ;)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shobhit Chauhan
RTI Activist
Founder President: Ek Sangharsh (Regd. NGO)
Mobile: 0-9717063875
E-mail: chauhans...@gmail.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/chauhanshobhit24
Twitter: www.twitter.com/chauhanshobhit
P Print only if absolutely necessary
*Disclaimer:*
This Email message along with any attachments is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential/ privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message from your system. If the reader is not the intended recipient then any dissemination, distribution or copy of this
communication is strictly prohibited. Reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that this message is virus-free. Shobhit Chauhan does not accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this message or attachments.
Shobhit Chauhan
Sep 1, 2017, 6:55:55 AM9/1/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shobhit Chauhan
RTI Activist
Founder President: Ek Sangharsh (Regd. NGO)
Mobile: 0-9717063875
E-mail: chauhans...@gmail.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/chauhanshobhit24
Twitter: www.twitter.com/chauhanshobhit
P Print only if absolutely necessary
*Disclaimer:*
This Email message along with any attachments is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential/ privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message from your system. If the reader is not the intended recipient then any dissemination, distribution or copy of this
communication is strictly prohibited. Reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that this message is virus-free. Shobhit Chauhan does not accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this message or attachments.
Dwarka Express
Sep 2, 2017, 12:17:10 PM9/2/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
The Vendors filed SLP in Supreme Court.The SC has also asked the applicant vendors to present their case in front of appropriate authority.
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Dwarka Express <dwarkaexp...@gmail.com> wrote:
The Hon'ble Judge has treated the applicants as vendors so it has permitted the applicants to present their case in front of TVC.The TVC is governed by New Vending Act-2014 which states that no vendor can be evicted or relocated untill the TVC conducts a survey.So the vendors can not be removed.The order is in 17th para while rest is observation.Forget Baba's, Kindly also inform what happend to Round about case?I heard some RTI activist has connived with agency.
Dwarka Express
Sep 2, 2017, 12:17:35 PM9/2/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
The Hon'ble Judge has treated the applicants as vendors so it has permitted the applicants to present their case in front of TVC.The TVC is governed by New Vending Act-2014 which states that no vendor can be evicted or relocated untill the TVC conducts a survey.So the vendors can not be removed.
The order is in 17th para while rest is observation.
Forget Baba's, Kindly also inform what happend to Round about case?
I heard some RTI activist has connived with agency.
Dwarka Express
Sep 3, 2017, 11:29:03 AM9/3/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Yes, this is my interview & I have exposed every person involved in corruption i.e. shopkeepers & officials.The vendors are victim of corrupt system.I support "Right To Livelihood" of vendors.
I dont shy away from the fact that the shopkeepers across Dwarka are extortionist's supported by officials.I am supporting vendors by demanding vending zone in Dwarka as per "New Vending Act-2014.
I am against encroachment & in support of vending zone for vendors.
--
Membership Application- Please visit...
We are Live on https://twitter.com/dwarkaforum
We are on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Dwarkaforum
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dwarka-residents.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Dwarka Express
Sep 3, 2017, 11:29:27 AM9/3/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Each shopkeeper were extorting 35000-40000 Rs from vendors since 2004-05 till 27Aug2015.Even today despite Delhi HC orders the extortion racket is thriving in Sec-4,5,6,7,10,11,12 mkt.
I am fighting for vending zone in Dwarka to put a full stop to corruption & extortion from vendors.
I am against encroachment of shopkeeper & residents and support "Right To Livelihood" of vendors across the globe.
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Dwarka Express <dwarkaexp...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, this is my interview & I have exposed every person involved in corruption i.e. shopkeepers & officials.The vendors are victim of corrupt system.I support "Right To Livelihood" of vendors.I dont shy away from the fact that the shopkeepers across Dwarka are extortionist's supported by officials.I am supporting vendors by demanding vending zone in Dwarka as per "New Vending Act-2014.I am against encroachment & in support of vending zone for vendors.
Dwarka Express
Sep 3, 2017, 11:30:18 AM9/3/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
The attached interview was mainly focused against my rivals in market who pretend to be against encroachment in Delhi High Court, where as the fact was they all were involved in extorting money from vendors.
--
Dwarka Express
R. Dua
Sep 5, 2017, 4:34:06 AM9/5/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Basically what we want to say here as Dwarka residents in ref to road side vendors and footpath vendors and in front of shop vendors is that, as far as we are concerned and as long as we can make money out of Public Land 'sab chalta hain'.
And a little politics in this makes it better for vote garnering for the next elections.
Regards to all.
...
Dwarka Express
Sep 5, 2017, 12:20:13 PM9/5/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Sir, the vendors of Dwarka are voters of some other colony or state.They are not voters of Dwarka so this is not electoral appeasement issue.We all are aware that the vendors are exploited by every department & indivioduals.The vendors have become necessity thats why they are increasing day by day.
Instead of discussing the problem lets find solution to it.
The solution is vending zone in Dwarka.
--
Membership Application- Please visit...
We are Live on https://twitter.com/dwarkaforum
We are on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Dwarkaforum
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dwarka-residents.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
sampath kumar Toopran
Sep 9, 2017, 3:48:20 AM9/9/17
to Dwarka-residents
I thought of sharing one reference which has done pioneering work for the protection of vendors rights and space in India: Self-Employed Women's Association (www.sewa.org). I am reproducing below a few lines from its website to show SEWA's level of engagement with hawkers and vendors.
Over
the years, the complexion of SEWA's membership has changed
significantly. In 2006, of SEWA's 4,83,012 strong membership in Gujarat,
60.77% was rural and 39.23% urban. Within our four major occupational
categories, the picture was as follows:
For more details, please visit SEWA's website. Thanks. T. Sampath Kumar |
REJIMON C K
Sep 12, 2017, 8:04:03 AM9/12/17
to DWARKA FORUM, sd...@googlegroups.com, Dwarka Forum GB Members Only
Another important document
We often find the Bus STOPS are encroached.Another on one on Footpaths (Sect 7 Ramphal area).
Shobhit Chauhan
Sep 13, 2017, 3:25:32 AM9/13/17
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Second circular is of great use. These workshops are found everywhere from Ramphal Chowk to Sector 12. Everywhere.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shobhit Chauhan
RTI Activist
Founder President: Ek Sangharsh (Regd. NGO)
Mobile: 0-9717063875
E-mail: chauhans...@gmail.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/chauhanshobhit24
Twitter: www.twitter.com/chauhanshobhit
7 Switch off as you go |q Recycle always | P Print only if absolutely necessary
*Disclaimer:*
This Email message along with any attachments is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential/ privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message from your system. If the reader is not the intended recipient then any dissemination, distribution or copy of this
communication is strictly prohibited. Reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that this message is virus-free. Shobhit Chauhan does not accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this message or attachments.
REJIMON C K
Feb 1, 2018, 4:58:21 AM2/1/18
to DWARKA FORUM, Minister Urban and Housing, encroachmentreport, ce...@dda.org.in, DDA Grievance Head, vcdda
Sanjiv
Read this Parliament Question and Answer on Encroachment.http://164.100.47.190/loksabhaquestions/annex/13/AU2336.pdf
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS
LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION No. 2336
TO BE ANSWERED ON JANUARY 02, 2018
ENCROACHMENT ON DDA LAND
No. 2336 PROF. SADHU SINGH:
SHRI BHAGWANT MANN:
Will the Minister of HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS be
pleased to state:
(a) whether it is true that Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has
not been able to safeguard its land across Delhi leading to
encroachment by land mafias;
(b) if so, the details thereof and the steps taken by the
Government in this regard;
(c) whether the Delhi High Court has directed DDA to prepare a
land management policy and set up a unit for removing
encroachment on DDA land;
(d) if so, the details thereof;
(e) whether the High Court has also directed NCT of Delhi and
Union Government to give constitutional status to the said
unit; and
(f) if so, the details thereof and the steps taken by the
Government in this regard?
ANSWER
THE MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) OF THE
MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS
(SHRI HARDEEP SINGH PURI)
(a) and (b): The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has intimated
that it has a suitable system/ mechanism in place to protect its land
and requisite steps are taken from time to time to strengthen it.
Recently, DDA has taken certain measures in this regard as follows:
i) A List of vacant land/ plots, land parcels has been prepared with
details and uploaded on its website for information of general
public.
ii) Uploading of photographs of these vacant land parcels/ plots on
monthly basis to ensure timely detection of encroachment on its
land, if any.
iii) Quick Response Teams (QRTs) have been constituted under the
Zonal Chief Engineers for early detection and removal of
encroachments.
iv) Boundary wall, fencing on all its vacant land/ plots has been
constructed to protect it from any attempt of encroachment.
v) Mobile app has also been developed so as to enable common
citizens to report any attempt of encroachment on DDA’s land.
(c) to (f): The Hon’ble High Court, Delhi, vide its Order dated
November 17, 2017 passed in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7057/2005 has
directed the DDA, the Government of National Capital Territory Delhi
(GNCTD) and the Central Government to inter-alia, create a standing
unit or cell to evolve effective land management policies. This cell
would also evolve appropriate task force(s), which would clear
encroachment on public land in a time bound manner. The Hon’ble
Court has further stated that, in its opinion, the task force or cell
should be given statutory status. The Hon’ble Court has directed
the DDA to file an action taken report in ten weeks after consulting
the parties concerned (i.e. the Central Government, the GNCTD, the
Delhi Police and other local and municipal bodies operating in
Delhi).
******
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:35 AM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Sir,
As per License property cell allocated ONLY 11 sites vide letter No. HC/plg(4873)/legal/148 dated 16-03-12 for chineese van as per High Court order dated 30-02-12 in wp(c) 842/2011
What even the ORDER CLEARLY read out that as per Clause 5.10.5 of MPD-2021, provisions for the ?Informal Trade? category can be made in areas like commercial centers, Government and commercial offices etc.
So how come the FOOTPATH become COMMERCIAL CENTRE ?
The order poriton also mentions Counsel for respondent No.5/DDA further submits that the area of Dwarka has been declared as Zero Violation Tolerance Area and a task force has been constituted under the directions of the Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, to enforce the aforesaid condition of Zero Violation Tolerance.
f. It is clarified that the aforesaid arrangement shall be purely temporary in nature and confined to the petitioners herein, as respondent No.5/DDA states that once a policy formulated by it is put into place, it shall be required to follow the normal practice of tendering/auctioning all the remaining sites that would have been identified in its jurisdiction.
Across Dwarka DDA allowed more than 100 Chinees and other Vans, Maruti Omni and other motorable and non motrable , semi permanent and permanent Cart Van or Structures errected.
This is not possible without BLESSING and NEXUS of the DDA EE SE CE Officials and so called RAID Party of DDA
Please initiate impounding all Carts, Vans and remove semi and permanent structures immediately
Please provide name of the staff with full Name, Father Name, Employment ID, Residential address to be named in the CONTEMPT of COURT individually
Please review the Annual Immovable and Movable assets submitted by DDA Officials and staff in this matter and compare as per CVC Vigilance Circular 2017 para 2.13 sub para xiii immediately the staffs involved in DDA Dwarka division who are NOTORIOUS for CORRUPTION
Grievance No. : 2018008933
REJIMON C K.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:41 PM, LISTENING POST <lggc....@nic.in> wrote:"Dwarka Forum(Regd)" <dwark...@gmail.com>
-------- Original Message --------
From:
Date: Jul 25, 2017 12:05:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Dwarka Forum-2017] Re: ENCROACHMENT :SERIOUS ISSUE.. Lets EXPOSE of Chief Engineer Dwarka (Contradicting)- Demand Directions for Policy & Correction & Recover REVENUE LOSS
To: Minister Urban <minist...@nic.in>, Vigilance DDA <dirv...@dda.org.in>, vcdda <vc...@dda.org.in>, office of as ud <as_u...@nic.in>, dir <mrina...@nic.in>, encroachmentreport <encroachm...@dda.org.in>, CVO DDA <c...@dda.org.in>, ns.t...@sansad.nic.in, DDA Nodel Officer <nodda...@nic.in>, DDA Grievance Head <sagr...@gmail.com>
Cc: LG Cell <lggc....@nic.in>, LG Delhi Email <lt...@nic.in>, Sanjeev Goyal <cwa...@gmail.com>President- Dwarka ForumRejimon CKThanking you,Please let us know the OUTCOME.So Mr. Ajit Toppo,As every one know the CE Dwarka was Promoted as Advisor for establishing these encroachment in addition to his feather in cap involvement in CWG where in even strictures issued by Vigilance Department.As per letter within 7 days ATR to be submitted by Commissioner (LD) and CE Dwarka.The so called word which our Prime Minister Repeated many times BENAMI seems to be referring to this only where in DDA staff are actually the BENAMI Investors in these encroached properties or establishment as evident.THE COTERIE of DDA Officials from TOP to Bottom are involved in these ENCROACHMENT .Sir,Attached a copy of the FORWARD dated 27/3/2017REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:43 AM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:I hope you are aware what the CHAIRMAN and Lt Governor of Delhi says.Mr. Paras NathI know you have NO ANSWER as your DEEP ROUTED in this WEB of CORRUPTION
"Road owning agencies to be responsible for repair & maintenance of roads and for keeping them encroachment free. (2/n)" Lt Governor
REJIMON C K.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:28 PM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Why do you have to say about these letters ?Mr. Paras Nath,Dir Vigilance,
Refer letter sent by Spl. CP/Traffic vide No. 6625/TE(D-III)/Traffic dated 25.09.2014 to Chief Secretary, GNCT of Delhi with a copy to all concerned civic
agencies.
Then letter has also been sent by L.G., Delhi vide No. 47(10)/RN/2014/1560/B-3988-94 dated 21.11.2014 to all the concerned civic agencies to
get the footpaths/pedestrian pathways vacated.
amount towards licence fees, if any, expected to be deposited by the
petitioners.
c. The aforesaid affidavit shall be handed over to the counsel for the
petitioners within two weeks, whereupon, counsel for the petitioners
shall obtain instructions from his clients as to the acceptability of the
identified locations.
d. As counsel for the petitioners asserts that there are far more
populated community centers/commercial districts in Dwarka Distt. which
have deliberately not been revealed by respondent No.5/DDA in its affidavit, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file an affidavit,
specifying such other commercial centers in Dwarka. Needful shall be
done within two weeks with a copy to the counsel for respondent No.5/DDA,
for her to obtain necessary instructions before the next date of hearing.
e. It is also directed that to obviate any further delay in finalizing
the sites for relocation of the petitioners, without prejudice to the
final policy that may be formulated ultimately by respondent No.5/DDA,
this time, the DDA shall take the initiative to have the sites as
identified by it for allocation to the petitioners, cleared by both, MCD
and the Delhi Police.
f. It is clarified that the aforesaid arrangement shall be purely
temporary in nature and confined to the petitioners herein, as respondent
No.5/DDA states that once a policy formulated by it is put into place, it
shall be required to follow the normal practice of tendering/auctioning
all the remaining sites that would have been identified in its
jurisdiction.
13. List on 20.10.2011.
Dasti to the parties.
HIMA KOHLI,J
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:39 PM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Still this encroachment not removed
On 16 Apr 2016 16:57, "Ramandeep Mann" <ramanm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Sir,We cannot understand, that how come the new location of the "Chinese Fast food Van" is not a encroachment, when it is encroaching the sec-22,footpath,Dwarka,New Delhi-77.Please remove the the said "Chinese Fast food Van", which is encroaching on the sec-22 Foot pathRegards,Ramandeep Singh Mann,
On 16 April 2016 at 09:25, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Back to square one
Sir that Chinese van is back on sec 22 footpath
SeeGet it impounded, not shifting
On 12 Feb 2016 15:31, "SEHQDWK" <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote:
Catering van mention in the complaint was on wrong location which is now removed from this location.SE(HQ)DWK
From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:28:36
To: SEHQDWK <enc...@dda.org.in>, encroachmentreport <encroachm...@dda.org.in>, DDA Grievance Head <sagr...@gmail.com>, vcdda <vc...@dda.org.in>, CVO DDA <c...@dda.org.in>
Cc: ads bsds <enc...@dda.org.in>, Ramandeep Mann <ramanm...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
Mere desh mahan...3. We dont know how the Court allowed on the one side DHC only asked to remove all the encroachments on the other side give permissions. Look at the cost of the shop in sector 22 DDA Market it is as per info not less than 50 Lakh, while this Chineese van get the equal space for FREE thanks to LPC and other authorities. I recall DDA demolished the CCTV room of Delhi Police in sector 6 market stating it was encroachment.2. Now the question the Role of NOTORIOUS - License Property Cell(LPC) of DDA. They are known for CORRUPTION and allotting public land for peanut price as happened in other cases such as Mobile Towers. Why don't LPC issue license to build TOILET in Dwarka ? why Don't LPC issue permission to build KioSK for Fruits and Vegetables or Vegetable markets? The Annual Asset Report for 2014 and 2015 may be scruitnised to see the VOLUME of INCREASE in Cash or Kind receipt if any by LPC staffs and their Moveble and immoveble assets increased or not. I don't know the CVO will look into this??1. If the allocated space for the License (Will deal separately whether the LPC action Valid or not) was at Sector 22 DDA Market. Instead of allotted location the licensee have been parking at Sector 21 T Point opposite to Sector 21 Metro station, initially on the corner Plot which now put boundary wall then on the footpaths blocking. Why not SE HQ Dwarka initiate cancellation of the allotment on this breach. The previous JE/AE/EE/SE should have actually done this. May be they had some kind of understanding with this particular Chinese van?The matter revealed the gross violation of all rules existing.Thank you SE Saab,highly appreciate your response.Thank you Mr. SE, Hope the cacellation recommendation be written to DC SDMC Najafgarh and LPC at the earliest with a copy to us.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:08 PM, SEHQDWK <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote:
1. 1. SDMC issued letter on 14-05-12 showing 10 location to park these catering vans.
2. 2. With reference to hon,ble High Court order dated 30-02-12 in wp(c) 842/2011, DDA was directed to allocate space for the petitioner’s van, accordingly license property cell allocated 10 sites vide letter No. HC/plg(4873)/legal/148 dated 16-03-12.
3. 3. Letter from SDMC/Public health Department/Najafgarh Zone date 14-05-12 which shows location for these catering vans. As per this letter Van allocated CSC-I Sector-22 Dwarka.
SE (HQ) DWK
From: ads bsds <enc...@dda.org.in>
Sent: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:26:34
To: "enccedw " <enc...@dda.org.in>
Subject: Fw: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
From: REJIMON C K reji...@gmail.com
Sent: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:20:13 +0530
To: SEHQDWK enc...@dda.org.in
Cc: encroachmentreport encroachm...@dda.org.in, sd...@googlegroups.com, EnC DDA EO ads bsds enc...@dda.org.in
Subject: Re: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
Dear SE Saab
You said the encroachment removed.
See the live picture taken few seconds before.
How come.
Also see another permanent structure tea stall coming up.
Hope redress it.
On 29 Jan 2016 10:31, "REJIMON C K" <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Look forward ZERO TOLERANCE Dwarka.Mr. SE HQ, we all will be with you to remove ANY ENCROACHMENT on ground. Recent SC, HC, NGT, LG and other orders backing you to take action.3. If the SDMC had issued, please share we will raise it with SDMC as on what ground they have right to issue permission on DDA is the Land and Road Owning Agency. The SDMC NGZ simply deny to install public urinal or even bins on roads stating that Roads are not under them. Now for these permission how can they issue such permissions? I hope your department will also need to write to them.2. If DDA had issued a document, appreciate if you could share that with us.1. How did SDMC issued papers to some of these people to operate from PUBLIC LAND.. Does the land or area mean for Public is for COMMERCIAL purpose ? Yes you have at least 30 shops lying vacant in sector 22 and 23 DDA Markets.. Why not these guys take that ?Mr. SE (HQ)Thank you very much , we really appreciate that if the action taken on this regard.
REJIMON C K.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:14 AM, SEHQDWK <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote:
There was a food selling van on footpath of sector-22. While inspecting it is found that they are having valid paper from SMCD/DDA but location is not correct. Now the Food van is removed from the footpath opf sector-22.
SE (HQ) DWK
Sent: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 10:10:18
To: SEHQDWK <enc...@dda.org.in>
Cc: encroachm...@dda.org.in, enc...@dda.org.in, vcdda <vc...@dda.org.in>, DDA Nodel Officer <nodda...@nic.in>, LG Cell <lggc....@nic.in>, Dwarka-residents@googlegroup.com, sd...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
What true lie
You don't considered this as seen on 1/1/2016 & been there for months, is it encroachment? Mr SE HQ Dwarka?
Please give back our footpath s
On 30 Dec 2015 10:13, "SEHQDWK" <enc...@dda.org.in> wrote:
There is no encroachment as the portion for providing slip road required for the junction of 30 metre road with road No. 210 at sector-22, is already seperated by providing boundary wall by transport department.
SE(HQ)DWK
From: "ads bsds"enc...@dda.org.in
Sent: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:42:13 +0530
To: "enc...@dda.org.in" enc...@dda.org.in
Subject: Fw: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
>
>From: encroachment report <encroachm...@dda.org.in>
>Sent: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:18:00
>To: "enceo3 " <enc...@dda.org.in>
>Subject: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
>Please send ATR directly to the complainant by email or by letter if complainant’s Email ID is not available, under intimation to this office by Email only at - encroachm...@dda.org.in.
>
>
>
>
>From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
>Sent: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 20:10:46
>To: encroachm...@dda.org.in
>Subject: What happened to my encroachment at sector 22 DWARKA?
>
--
Membership Application- Please visit...
We are Live on https://twitter.com/dwarkaforum
We are on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Dwarkaforum
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dwarka-residents.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Membership Application- Please visit...
We are Live on https://twitter.com/dwarkaforum
We are on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Dwarkaforum
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dwarka-residents.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-----RegardsIn-Charge LG's Listening Post
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages