Noting that a housing society cannot shun its responsibility by arguing that its duty of care is confined to the common areas and not to individual flats, the court said the society must carry out all the required repair work in the buildings or ensure that it is done by the residents whose house may be in a state of disrepair.
The court held this, as it ordered Rohini-based Oriental Co-operative Group Housing society to shell out Rs 15 lakh, along with a nine per cent interest, to the parents of a 20-year-old man who died after a part of a balcony fell on him.
Kapil, a third-year student with the Delhi College of Engineering, was crushed under the debris after a concrete slab along the edge of the balcony that collapsed on July 24, 2005, while he was returning home.
Kapil’s father Dina Nath Arora and mother Usha subsequently filed a case and named the society, the lieutenant governor, the MCD and the registrar of co-operative societies, as parties. Their petition further arrayed the construction company, the architect and also the owner of the flat as parties to the case.
Claiming Rs 1 crore in damages, the petition alleged that all the authorities had failed in carrying out their duties of supervision, which resulted in the tragedy. Also blaming sub-standard materials used in constructing the flats, the petition said Kapil was an engineering student and his salary, along with future prospects, must be considered while computing the damages.
Seeking to wriggle out of the liability, the society argued that it could not be made responsible for the fault of an individual flat owner. It contended that the members paid a monthly maintenance fee of Rs 600, which was utilised for upkeep of only the common areas.
A single-judge bench, however, held the society liable for the incident and asked it to pay Rs 15 lakh in compensation. Aggrieved, the society challenged this order before a division bench, claiming it was erroneous to fasten a liability on the society only because it charged a maintenance fee from its members.
The bench, headed by Justice Pradeep Nandarajog, upheld that the society would be responsible for the inferior quality construction of the flats and also for the maintenance and upkeep of the flats.
Dismissing the society’s appeal, the court said it was “obvious” that either the structural reinforcement was weak or material mixture used in construction was sub-standard. Had it not been the case, the structure, which was intended to last for at least 50 years, would not have collapsed within 17 years of its construction, the court observed.
The HC decision is silent about meeting the expenses in the maintenance of individual flat in such circumstances as other members of the co-operative society will naturally be unwilling to share the expenses of a flat owned by someone else. But, simultaneously, if the same is not maintained, it will be hazardous for residents and for the whole tower.
How the Society will recover the expenses from the irresponsible or careless owner? What if the owner has died and flat is in dispute among his heirs? Hope, in the appeal decision, if any appeal is filed by the Group Housing Society, these and other issues will be made clear.
However, this is an important issue now-a-days as the co-operative societies are coming in big number in metro and other big cities.
--
***********************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"DWARKA-FORUM" -- [Dwarka Ki Awaaz]
Visit Website www.dwarkaforum.org
Like us!! Click www.facebook.com/dwarkaforum
Please bring ACTOR's who are movers and shakers of Dwarka into this platform. Share them the above weblink either by email or through SMS.
Dwarka Forum doing a TALENT SEARCH.. Are you for a Social Cause of Dwarka? Join us
Police: 100 & 1090 Ambulance: 102 & 1099, Fire: 101, Traffic: 1095/23010101, Dwarka PS: 28051584, ACP:28051587, DCP: 28042984.
SDM-25017834, Child-1098, Women-1091, Sr. Citizen 1291, Postal 1914, AIIMS-26588700, Blood Bank, 23716441, ORBO 1060, Eye-1919, Disaster Management- 1070. LG Complaints 155355, CMO 155345, MCD-1266/25321235/23910419, DDA-24690431, DJB-1916, MTNL-198
Provided that if due to internal change or damage there is any seepage or structural defect in another flat, the affected member/occupant may make a representation to committee, which shall carryout inspection of the flat within fifteen days and if it comes to the conclusion that the representation is correct, the committee shall advise the concerned member to take corrective steps immediately and if no action is taken within seven days, the committee shall initiate action for getting the defects removed if necessary by taking police assistance for it and approach the Registrar for the recovery of amount incurred thereon as arrears of the land revenue from the member, who had carried out internal changes which has caused harm to another flat
102. Maintenance of essential services in a cooperative housing society-
(1) The Committee shall be responsible for maintaining the following essential services in the housing complex on regular basis, namely:-
(a) Electricity supply;
(b) Water supply and sewerage;
(c) Garbage disposal;.
(d) Running of lifts, borewell, Genset, Water Harvesting system and maintenance of green areas;
(e) Security services;
(f) Availability of plumber, electrician and Mali etc., for day to day services for all occupants;
(g) Availability of fire safety equipments/systems in running condition;
(h) Round the clock hours emergency response and staffing; and
(i) Other services as may be specified by the General body;
(5) (a) Various items of the repairs, and maintenance which are to be carried out by the
Co-operative housing societies from its funds are mainly as under:
(i) Internal roads;
(ii) Compound wall;
(iii) External water pipe lines;
(iv) Water pumps;
68
(v) Water storage tanks;
(vi) Drainage lines;
(vii) Septic tank (where in use);
(viii) Staircases;
(ix) Fire fighting system;
(x) Structural repairs of roofs of all flats;
(xi) Outside walls/exterior of the building(s);
(xii) All leakages of water including leakage due to rain water and leakages due to external
common pipe line and drainage line;
(xiii) Electric lines upto main switches in the flats and lightning of common areas;
(xiv) Lifts;
(xv) Damaged ceiling and plaster thereon in the top floors, on account of the leakage of
the rain water through the terrace;
(xvi) Maintenance of parks and mandatory green areas;
(xvii) Facilities for household garbage collection in segregated form;
(xviii) Telephone exchange and telephone wires upto flats;
(xix) Security guard room;
(xx) Common Parking and garages;
(xxi) Power back up or Genset; and
Generally you can’t alter at all as the plans are passed by DDA.
Any changes I feel will be illegal ,but let the experts give their comments
Rajeev
No flat owner is allowed to change theoriginal plan . It is an offence and societyshould not allow such alteration, if it is donematter is to be reported to RCS and DDA foraction against the flat owner.one is permitted for temporary structure onlywith no changes to the main structure.Anil RajputFrom: swa...@gmail.comSent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 11:57 AMSubject: Re: [DWARKA FORUM] Housing society at fault if flats not maintained, rules HC
What if a member alters the interirs of his flat? Like constructng toilets in the balcony? RgdsSent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
Rather being a MC he should set an example by not doing something wrong.
Rajeev