--
===========================================================NOTE:
Any message posted will be Sole "RESPONSIBILITY" of the "SENDER(Post-Author)". The Moderator and owner of this blog googlegroup have NO Responsibility.
===========================================================
===========================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA-FORUM" :-- Dwarka Ki Awaaz
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Dwarka-residents?hl=en
Posting Rules:
Visit at http://groups.google.com/group/Dwarka-residents/web/posting-rules
===========================================================
| I personally think beating a stick is unnecessary. Obviously every potential thief will be aware that the security guard on duty will have a stick so I don't know what the point is of making it clear that the guard indeed possesses a danda by beating it. The whistle too is unnecessary to blow without any reason. In the olden days whistle blowing was a form of communication for policemen. Whistle should only be blown if the guard wants to call for backup when he sees something suspicious. --- On Mon, 11/23/09, Madhuri Varshney <vmadhu...@gmail.com> wrote: |
|