Illegal occupancy of pavements, temporary shops and related obstruction to movements which is Against Pedestrian Rights on Dwarka Sect 22 Roads.

442 views
Skip to first unread message

REJIMON C K

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 1:10:14 AM9/4/08
to DWARKA FORUM, Rahul Sharma, Sect 22, DDA RWA, Prabhat Sharma, asraf alam
Dear All, Pls find attached letter delivered to SHO Dwarka.. I think similar letter must go from all CGHS and RWA Office bearer with growing  Illegal occupancy of pavements, temproray shops and related obstruction across Dwarka Sub City(which is Master Plan Subcity) and No Tolerance Zone.
Unfortunately day by day Dwarka is falling into the category of unplanned city look..
Are we ready to correct this ? or let it be like Karol Bagh or Lajpat Nagar or any other parts of  City ?
Please comment.
 
Regards,
 
Rejimon
 
 
12th August 2008.

      To:

      Mr. Tilak Raj Mongia, SHO,

      Police Station Sector-23,

      Dwarka, New Delhi. 

        Subject: Illegal occupancy of pavements, temporary shops and related obstruction to movements which is Against Pedestrian Rights on Dwarka Sect 22 Roads. 

      Dear Sir, 

      You may well aware of the illegal encroachment of public land (pedestrian paths) on various paths of Sector 22, Dwarka. Especially the road near Green Valley Junction(along the park) towards Nav Sansad Vihar, Plot No.4. Sect 22. There are a number of Chai wala, Pan wala, STD Booths ,Hair Dresser and others. This creates not just INSECURITY among residents especially ladies and children but also potential meeting place for anti social elements . Over and above they create unhealthy unhygienic environment near the park area, since they do not have waste disposal system and spread garbage in the area of their operation. As is well known these type of shops begin with this temporary placement and then begin to claim permanency. Since these are unlicensed vendors exploiting the vacant pavements we in Sector 22 would like it to be a non pavement hawker zone. 

      We therefore request you to respect the rights of the Pedestrian and ensuring safety to residents of Dwarka, by  removing all illegal establishments on public areas, including pavements and temporary shops operating from inside the broken openings of boundary walls of Societies located in Sector 22 Dwarka as early as possible.  

Thanking you, 

Yours faithfully. 
 
 

Col. (Retd) Vikram Tiwathia

(Vice-President) Nav Sansad Vihar CGHS Ltd

cc : All socities in Sector 22.

Letter to SHO-Dwarka-Illegal occupancy of pavement.pdf

R. Dua

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 5:24:12 AM10/8/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Pl follow up on this with the authority in reference to all sectors of Dwarka.Thanks for the initiative Sir.

anurag bahl

unread,
Oct 9, 2008, 2:59:14 PM10/9/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com

Dear Members,

 

This is an issue which effects all the sectors of Dwarka. Even the market pavements/public area is full of these unwanted hawkers causing great security hazard for all present there. As we are well aware how badly we are prone to terror attacks. Even in case of fire there is little space left for evacuation. With little/no space for parking left the area becomes a perfect target for terror attack.

 

Unfortunately the nexus between these hawkers,market associations & police is all about money. There is a regular payment by these illegal encroachers to the nearby shop owners or police. When we compalin to police they merely do an eye wash & these people appear again. It is only during the red alert that these hawkers are removed. Dwarka is a zero tolerance area only on papers. DDA is responsible for removing these hawkers regularly & they should regularly check of these encroachments. When i spoke to the zonal engineer Mr Verma he showed his helpness due to lack of police support which is think is again lack of will power & attitude.

 

Having said that i do think that we need a proper place for sabzi mandi/market where we can buy daily perishables /merchandise at nominal prices (on the lines of INA market). This market should have adequate parking place, safety measures in case of fire & other modern amenities (toilets, lifts etc). We can pursue DDA for allocating land for this purpose & can ask to release tender for pvt public partnership to construct & manage such a market. This may act as a detterent for reri wallas & other hawkers & in case they do indulge in encroachments then they should be adequately punished. This will also help us to go to one place only instead of going to different weekly bazars on different days which are a complete nuisance in terms of road blockades, traffic snarls & ofcorse safety hazard.

 

Can we pursue this as a priority? also can we list down issues on priority & delegate some active members to follow up regularly so that work is divided & we can use our time effeciently. I will list down all the issues soon which i think are effecting us & then may be we can discuss them.

 

regards

anurag

 


 

 


Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now

R. Dua

unread,
Oct 10, 2008, 6:13:35 AM10/10/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Kudos to you for highlighting this problem and its repercussions. If we don't do something now they will become permanent fixtures.

Sunil Shukla

unread,
Oct 10, 2008, 6:28:36 AM10/10/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Even me too, like to send my support on the matter

 


Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

REJIMON C K

unread,
Oct 10, 2008, 11:01:10 AM10/10/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
I suggest the subcommitte under Adv. Ashokji may advice.
May be we all meet in the coming week on this.
wDYT?
Rejimon
> Cricket on your mind? Visit the ultimate cricket website. Enter
> http://beta.cricket.yahoo.com
> >
>


--
REJIMON C K. Nav Sansad Vihar, Sector 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077
India. P Help save trees and paper - print only if necessary?

M.K. Gupta

unread,
Oct 10, 2008, 9:45:22 AM10/10/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Have we read the initiative taken by a flower seller at Hanuman Mandir of Connaughter Place in such case.  The seller has shown the path to us.
m k gupta

--- On Fri, 10/10/08, Sunil Shukla <sunils...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

Bollywood news, movie reviews, film trailers and more! Click here.

anurag bahl

unread,
Oct 10, 2008, 2:00:37 PM10/10/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com

Dear  Mr Gupta,

 

Pls higlite the story for our inspiration.

 

Regards

Anurag

anil nayal

unread,
Oct 11, 2008, 2:08:39 AM10/11/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
I agree on this.

N. Ramakrishnan

unread,
Oct 11, 2008, 3:27:16 AM10/11/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Illegal occupancy of pavements will cause a major problem. Couple of years back, near the paramount school, we had some six illegal makeshift shops cropped up on the pavements selling milk, bread to atta !! I took up this matter was many people around at that time but no one bothered as there were no markets nearby and these shops were convenient for residents and in fact many residents were happy to see them around (including a telephone booth on the pavement).  I used to tell them, this may be a temporary relief, but these guys can become a complete nuisance for the peacful living in future. I told these shop walas to pack off but they didn't listen.  I went to the police station and complained (without even getting a written complaint, the policemen came and packed them off). Off late, I see it is re-surfacing.
 
This is a menace and it has to be tackled at the beginning itself. Vasant Kunj is one classic example of this problem (today the residents there are unable to get them vacated - because the illegal occupants are a group and they develop clout over a period of time).
 
Rama


--- On Sat, 10/11/08, anil nayal <anil...@gmail.com> wrote:

M.K. Gupta

unread,
Oct 11, 2008, 2:43:10 AM10/11/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
The story was published prominently probably on page two in TOI within a week.  On this
sting carried by the Vigilence Departgment of Delhi Govt. 17 or 18 officers were arrested
by the Police for asking the extortion money from the traders.
M K Gupta

--- On Fri, 10/10/08, anurag bahl <anura...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

REJIMON C K

unread,
Oct 23, 2008, 4:09:50 AM10/23/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
High Court orders closure of illegal roadside eateries

Thu, Oct 23 01:55 AM

Your favourite roadside eatery -the dhaba that offers a quick bite when you need it most-may soon have to shut if its owner does not hold a MCD licence. In a significant direction, Delhi High Court has asked the civic agency to crack the whip on all illegal eateries in the Capital and close them within a month.

Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra said: "It is directed that all dhabas on that road and for the matter throughout Delhi running without licence must be treated equally and all dhabas which are without license being run in municipal area must be closed down forthwith. "The action of closure of these dhabas be taken within 30 days and an affidavit in this respect be filed in the court along with the names of all responsible officials of each area who are liable to take the necessary action," the order added.

The court's order came on a petition by a Rajiv Tyagi, a dhaba owner, who alleged the MCD was adopting a pick and choose policy while closing "illegal" dhabas in Mandaoli area of East Delhi. The civic agency had cracked down against only six while there were many other illegal dhabas in the area, he alleged MCD said these six served non-vegetarian food whereas the others sold only vegetarian stuff.

Rejecting the contention, Justice Dhingra said: "No distinction can be made out on the ground that one dhaba is serving vegetarian food and the other is serving non-vegetarian food. The distinction can be drawn between licensed and unlicensed ones.

"At first instance, no dhaba should be allowed to run without a licence. There is no reason why these unauthorised dhabas, hawkers, road encroachers should keep encroaching on public land endangering public health by greasing palms of the concerned officials," the court observed.

"If the officials have little care about the health of public and about the encroachment of public land, none of these dhabas, hawkers would come up at the first instance," the order added.



 


India. P Help save trees and paper - print only if necessary?

M.K. Gupta

unread,
Oct 23, 2008, 4:33:42 AM10/23/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
The situation is same every where in Dwarka or in Delhi as it is in sector 22.  The order also covers the food vans operating without licences and in second violation, parked on public land, foot paths etc. Let us wait for a month, the time granted to the MCD.
 
After that, if reqd. will chalk out further course of action.
M K Gupta  

--- On Thu, 23/10/08, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
Subject: [DwarkaForum] Re: [DF-Rgd] Re: Dwarka Forum: Illegal occupancy of pavements, temporary shops and related obstruction to movements which is Against Pedestrian Rights on Dwarka Sect 22 Roads.
To: Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, 23 October, 2008, 1:39 PM

High Court orders closure of illegal roadside eateries

Thu, Oct 23 01:55 AM

Your favourite roadside eatery -the dhaba that offers a quick bite when you need it most-may soon have to shut if its owner does not hold a MCD licence. In a significant direction, Delhi High Court has asked the civic agency to crack the whip on all illegal eateries in the Capital and close them within a month.

Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra said: "It is directed that all dhabas on that road and for the matter throughout Delhi running without licence must be treated equally and all dhabas which are without license being run in municipal area must be closed down forthwith. "The action of closure of these dhabas be taken within 30 days and an affidavit in this respect be filed in the court along with the names of all responsible officials of each area who are liable to take the necessary action," the order added.
The court's order came on a petition by a Rajiv Tyagi, a dhaba owner, who alleged the MCD was adopting a pick and choose policy while closing "illegal" dhabas in Mandaoli area of East Delhi. The civic agency had cracked down against only six while there were many other illegal dhabas in the area, he alleged MCD said these six served non-vegetarian food whereas the others sold only vegetarian stuff.
Rejecting the contention, Justice Dhingra said: "No distinction can be made out on the ground that one dhaba is serving vegetarian food and the other is serving non-vegetarian food. The distinction can be drawn between licensed and unlicensed ones.
"At first instance, no dhaba should be allowed to run without a licence. There is no reason why these unauthorised dhabas, hawkers, road encroachers should keep encroaching on public land endangering public health by greasing palms of the concerned officials," the court observed.
"If the officials have little care about the health of public and about the encroachment of public land, none of these dhabas, hawkers would come up at the first instance," the order added.


 


On 10/8/08, R. Dua <r.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
Pl follow up on this with the authority in reference to all sectors of Dwarka.Thanks for the initiative Sir.

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:40 AM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All, Pls find attached letter delivered to SHO Dwarka.. I think similar letter must go from all CGHS and RWA Office bearer with growing  Illegal occupancy of pavements, temproray shops and related obstruction across Dwarka Sub City(which is Master Plan Subcity) and No Tolerance Zone.
Unfortunately day by day Dwarka is falling into the category of unplanned city look..
Are we ready to correct this ? or let it be like Karol Bagh or Lajpat Nagar or any other parts of  City ?
Please comment.
 
Regards,
 
Rejimon
 
 
12th August 2008.
      To:
      Mr. Tilak Raj Mongia, SHO,
      Police Station Sector-23,
      Dwarka, New Delhi. 
        Subject: Illegal occupancy of pavements, temporary shops and related obstruction to movements which is Against Pedestrian Rights on Dwarka Sect 22 Roads. 
      Dear Sir, 
      You may well aware of the illegal encroachment of public land (pedestrian paths) on various paths of Sector 22, Dwarka. Especially the road near Green Valley Junction(along the park) towards Nav Sansad Vihar, Plot No.4. Sect 22. There are a number of Chai wala, Pan wala, STD Booths ,Hair Dresser and others. This creates not just INSECURITY among residents especially ladies and children but also potential meeting place for anti social elements . Over and above they create unhealthy unhygienic environment near the park area, since they do not have waste disposal system and spread garbage in the area of their operation. As is well known these type of shops begin with this temporary placement and then begin to claim permanency. Since these are unlicensed vendors exploiting the vacant pavements we in Sector 22 would like it to be a non pavement hawker zone. 
      We therefore request you to respect the rights of the Pedestrian and ensuring safety to residents of Dwarka, by  removing all illegal establishments on public areas, including pavements and temporary shops operating from inside the broken openings of boundary walls of Societies located in Sector 22 Dwarka as early as possible.  
Thanking you, 
Yours faithfully. 
 
 
Col. (Retd) Vikram Tiwathia
(Vice-President) Nav Sansad Vihar CGHS Ltd
cc : All socities in Sector 22.
India. P Help save trees and paper - print only if necessary?

sushil kumar

unread,
Oct 24, 2008, 4:29:45 AM10/24/08
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
The main problem is implementation of it.We must have seen the ceiling /Demolishing unauthoried construction issue.What has happend to that?Only few poor people lost their home and other than that nothing has happened.As per report MCD is all set to deceiling the properties.
 
thx
sushil




Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:03:42 +0530
From: mkgup...@yahoo.co.in
Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.</a

R. Dua

unread,
Dec 6, 2008, 3:01:10 AM12/6/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
What are we doing about this issue Sirs? No point giving reasons for same sirs. Problem increasing by the day. Regards.

M.K. Gupta

unread,
Dec 6, 2008, 6:35:17 AM12/6/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Mrs. Dua, u r reacting after almost one and half month.  Is not it too late?  Now, most
of the members are worried about spreading terrorism.  No doubt, issue of encroachment has not died down but for the time being, it seems to have been put on back burner under compulsion.
Regards,
m k gupta


--- On Sat, 6/12/08, R. Dua <r.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: R. Dua <r.du...@gmail.com>
Subject: [DwarkaForum] Re: [DF-Rgd] Re: Dwarka Forum: Illegal occupancy of pavements, temporary shops and related obstruction to movements which is Against Pedestrian Rights on Dwarka Sect 22 Roads.
To: Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Date: Saturday, 6 December, 2008, 1:31 PM

What are we doing about this issue Sirs? No point giving reasons for same sirs. Problem increasing by the day. Regards.

On 10/24/08, sushil kumar <sushi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
The main problem is implementation of it.We must have seen the ceiling /Demolishing unauthoried construction issue.What has happend to that?Only few poor people lost their home and other than that nothing has happened.As per report MCD is all set to deceiling the properties.
 
thx
sushil




Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:03:42 +0530
From: mkgup...@yahoo.co.in

Subject: [DwarkaForum] Re: [DF-Rgd] Re: Dwarka Forum: Illegal occupancy of pavements, temporary shops and related obstruction to movements which is Against Pedestrian Rights on Dwarka Sect 22 Roads.
To: Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com


The situation is same every where in Dwarka or in Delhi as it is in sector 22.  The order also covers the food vans operating without licences and in second violation, parked on public land, foot paths etc.. Let us wait for a month, the time granted to the MCD.
 
After that, if reqd. will chalk out further course of action.
M K Gupta  

--- On Thu, 23/10/08, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
Subject: [DwarkaForum] Re: [DF-Rgd] Re: Dwarka Forum: Illegal occupancy of pavements, temporary shops and related obstruction to movements which is Against Pedestrian Rights on Dwarka Sect 22 Roads.
To: Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, 23 October, 2008, 1:39 PM

High Court orders closure of illegal roadside eateries

Thu, Oct 23 01:55 AM

Your favourite roadside eatery -the dhaba that offers a quick bite when you need it most-may soon have to shut if its owner does not hold a MCD licence. In a significant direction, Delhi High Court has asked the civic agency to crack the whip on all illegal eateries in the Capital and close them within a month.
Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra said: "It is directed that all dhabas on that road and for the matter throughout Delhi running without licence must be treated equally and all dhabas which are without license being run in municipal area must be closed down forthwith. "The action of closure of these dhabas be taken within 30 days and an affidavit in this respect be filed in the court along with the names of all responsible officials of each area who are liable to take the necessary action," the order added.
The court's order came on a petition by a Rajiv Tyagi, a dhaba owner, who alleged the MCD was adopting a pick and choose policy while closing "illegal" dhabas in Mandaoli area of East Delhi. The civic agency had cracked down against only six while there were many other illegal dhabas in the area, he alleged MCD said these six served non-vegetarian food whereas the others sold only vegetarian stuff.
Rejecting the contention, Justice Dhingra said: "No distinction can be made out on the ground that one dhaba is serving vegetarian food and the other is serving non-vegetarian food. The distinction can be drawn between licensed and unlicensed ones.
"At first instance, no dhaba should be allowed to run without a licence. There is no reason why these unauthorised dhabas, hawkers, road encroachers should keep encroaching on public land endangering public health by greasing palms of the concerned officials," the court observed.
"If the officials have little care about the health of public and about the encroachment of public land, none of these dhabas, hawkers would come up at the first instance," the order added.



Be the first one to try the new Messenger 9 Beta! Click here.

RAJEEV SOLANKI

unread,
Dec 7, 2008, 3:49:03 AM12/7/08
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Dear Mr gupta
we decided that we will wait till elections and then restart on the issues related to betterment and development of Dwarka after 2-3 months again there will be elections
my suggestion is that Dwarka development issues/ works  has to go  simultaneously along with national interest issues
if the Mc of the Forum agrees then let us list out the issues and the plan of action
thks

rajiv solanki





Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:05:17 +0530
Be the first one to try the new Messenger 9 Beta! Click here.</a




Send e-mail anywhere. No map, no compass. Get your Hotmail® account now.

R. Dua

unread,
Dec 8, 2008, 2:55:09 AM12/8/08
to Dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
 Guptaji, my efforts are also to focus on  all issues. All these issues are interrelated at one point or the other. I am sure you all learned gentleman know this better than I do sir. Regarding the time lapse of one and a half months Guptaji, we all know these things take time, this was just to let the respected members that problem is increasing.
As Rajeevji mentioned development works have to go on.Infact clearing of pavements will be a step in keeping a check on any untoward activity. If the Forum Members think otherwise pl ignore this post. Thankyou. 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages