刘因全狂批孙中山等于政治自杀
老路不认为孙中山不能批判,数年前老路的朋友王怡先生发表长文批判孙中山是“乱臣贼子”,老路就没有觉得不妥。盖因王怡是公共知识分子,以独立人士的身份在学术讨论中提出自己的意见,可以视作一种观点,无伤大雅。但是作为中国社会民主党(西翼)主要领导人(该党称其为主持人,好像该党是一台晚会节目)的刘因全先生,也拾别人牙慧,狂骂孙中山,这就让老路感到荒唐可笑了。
首先,孙中山不是圣人,不是上帝,作为近代革命的先行者,肯定有很多毛病,这是时代的局限所致。刘因全先生以近乎圣人的标准去攻击一个革命先行者好色、揽权、卖国,岂不荒唐?况且,即使圣人孔老夫子,难道就没有好色(子见南子)、揽权(杀害少正卯)、卖国(周游列国十几年,推行他的那套仁政,谁用他就给谁干,心怀天下,何曾独独关心过他的祖国鲁国?)的问题么?对待历史人物要从历史宏阔视界看待,不能拿着放大镜找毛病。老路相信,就是闭花羞月的大美女,你要拿个显微镜看她,也只能发现她满脸蠕动的细菌。
其次,孙中山首倡革命,推翻专制帝制,创建亚洲第一个人民共和国,其历史功绩彪炳千秋,无人可以比拟,连中共都不得不借他的大旗,偷卖自己的私货,而不敢公开炫耀专制独裁。正是由于他的五权宪法,奠定了进入台湾的宪政基础,这一切怎么可以一笔抹杀?特别是他首创的三民主义,其中民权、民生的主张,跟社会民主主义理念具有高度重合。刘因全先生作为社会民主党人,作为一个追求社会民主主义理念的政党领袖,却攻击首创三民主义的孙中山(他的搭档陈泱潮甚至公开攻击三民主义和五权宪法),这不等于在否定自己的政治理想么?不是在自掘祖坟么?
再次,刘因全先生攻击孙中山的动机殊为可笑,他自己亲口说,由于某次出访台湾,台湾拖了好久不给他签证,所以怒上心头,转而攻击孙中山,因为孙中山是中华民国国父!子孙对不起老刘,老刘就骂祖先,这跟任性使气的孩子有什么两样?
老路听说中国社会民主党分成东西两翼之后,西翼社民党尊刘因全先生为党主,号称“主持人”,准备于明年召开的社民党三大上登记成为党主席,老路哑然失笑,连连摇头。因为江湖上提到刘因全先生,首先想到的是参与张宏宝遗产大战的中功总部秘书长,是神神叨叨轮回转世的李广、洪仁轩和吴佩孚等风云人物,唯独不会想到他会是伟大的中国社会民主主义事业的继承人。莫非胸怀经世伟略、欲为三党(正义、民主、社民)教父的王希哲先生,身怀惊世奇才、壮志谋国的草庵居士,到头来居然会辅佐这等人物来建立不世之功?
刘因全先生辱骂孙中山,让老路想起杜甫的讥刺一些三流诗人攻击初唐四杰的一首诗:
王杨卢骆当时体,
轻薄为文哂未休。
尔曹身与名俱灭,
不废江河万古流。
From: hongweibin...@googlemail.com
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:22:03 +0800
Subject: Re: 刘因全狂批孙中山等于政治自杀
To: liulu...@gmail.com
CC: zhudeq...@hotmail.com; xuyu...@live.com; zhengmin...@googlegroups.com; socialist...@googlegroups.com; gongminlilian...@googlegroups.com; gongzuo...@googlegroups.com; gongmi...@googlegroups.com; gongmin...@googlegroups.com; yi...@live.com.au; zhangguo...@gmail.com; weyma...@hotmail.com; ngkwo...@gmail.com; tzw...@hotmail.co.jp; zn...@hotmail.com; chenzh...@hotmail.com; free...@gmail.com; liangb...@gmail.com; zhouyu...@hotmail.com; lizhix...@hotmail.com; oac...@gmail.com; kimxi...@hotmail.com; song.m...@gmail.com; amyzh...@gmail.com; jiangxi...@gmail.com; youna...@hotmail.com; many...@aol.com; fuhu2...@yahoo.com; fuhu2...@gmail.com; lzx...@hotmail.com; lvho...@gmail.com; jesuslo...@hotmail.com; zhudeq...@hotmail.com; compt...@gmail.com; parti...@hotmail.com; anh...@hotmail.com; anlin...@yahoo.co.jp; paris...@hotmail.com; fanl...@googlemail.com; waiyi...@hotmail.com; xhz...@yahoo.com; chan...@newschool.edu; minz...@yahoo.com; aca...@gmail.com; johnchan...@hotmail.com; tjc...@umac.mo; kt2...@igc.org; edi...@epochtimes.com; dup...@googlegroups.com; duowe...@yahoo.com; fzn1...@hotmail.com; f...@fdc64.de; shengp...@yahoo.com; fzh...@hotmail.co.jp; chin...@chinaaid.org; micha...@yahoo.com; gaoha...@gmail.com; gaoxing...@gmail.com; k_ts...@hotmail.com; thoma...@gmail.com; hw20...@hotmail.com; lian...@gmail.com; no...@gdzf.org; tbc...@gmail.com; ilik...@gmail.com; hup...@gmail.com; huanghe...@hotmail.com; yuenche...@yahoo.com.hk; jiaogu...@sina.com; laogr...@gmail.com; lawren...@aol.com; kath...@yahoo.com; day...@gmail.com; lidongc...@googlemail.com; lifen...@gmail.com; guotao...@gmail.com; lijin...@hotmail.com; liaoz...@gmail.com; lin.er...@gmail.com; ming...@yahoo.com; linmu...@gmail.com; liut...@yahoo.com; cdp20...@gmail.com; liug...@hotmail.com; steel...@gmail.com; newyor...@gmail.com; lgk20...@hotmail.com; in...@pfdc1977.com; quantid...@googlegroups.com; rua...@fastmail.fm; shiboy...@163.com; suyuto...@gmail.com; gene...@lawyersforyou.org; tiananm...@gmail.com; wongm...@gmail.com; cdpw...@gmail.com; wl7...@hotmail.com; wanglo...@hotmail.com; shuju...@hotmail.com; tongw...@gmail.com; 14407...@qq.com; xiang...@verizon.net; xiaop...@gmail.com; ne...@huanghuagang.org; janet...@comcast.net; yanxio...@yahoo.com; xushui...@gmail.com; xu_w...@brown.edu; xube...@gmail.com; yi...@ucl.ac.uk; xuef...@hotmail.com; yenhu...@yahoo.com; yangji...@gmail.com; williamg...@gmail.com; yangyi...@hotmail.com; yangzih...@gmail.com; yipi...@gmail.com; ron...@edoors.com; edo...@gmail.com; zana...@gmail.com; 13692...@qq.com; jingz...@aol.com; zhangkai...@gmail.com; zsyy...@gmail.com; freech...@gmail.com; ng_...@hotmail.com; xin....@ntdtv.com; cdpx...@googlegroups.com; jianw...@yahoo.com; huax...@bellsouth.net