Objective: Discuss how the commonly used demographic information collected through polls and user surveys, while descriptive, may have limitation in identifying library user characteristics. Describe statistical models that can improve our knowledge about library users.
Background: Library surveys often ask demographic questions such as age, user type or library use. However these demographic questions are created by researchers' preconceived notions which were formed based on existing library statistics, user profiles, or simply by the researchers' observation of the survey population. What if the demographics is not a factor in survey responses? For example, if the average library facilities satisfaction scores from two demographic groups (Graduate Students and Faculty) are similar, does that indicate the Graduate Student and Faculty respondents are satisfied with library facilities the same way? What if there are significant differences among the Graduate Students and Faculty respondents are not on group level (Graduate Students vs. Faculty) but on an individual level? How can researchers test and discover the unobserved user characteristics?
Method: In spring 2014 the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign conducted the LibQUAL+(r) Lite Survey, an online survey for assessing library service quality. Initially descriptive statistical analysis was conducted (e.g. cross-tabulation by demographics). However, it was unclear if there were significant relationships between User Groups and particular questions under investigation. General Linear Models were used to identify correlation in the data and some hidden user characteristics (latent variables) emerged.
The study investigated the characteristics of special libraries in meeting their information needs in selected institution in Ibadan, Oyo state, Nigeria. It was conducted ex post facto using the descriptive survey research design. The purposive sampling techniques were adopted for the selection of two libraries in the state. These are Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (IAR&T) and Institute of French Research in Africa. One hundred and fifty questionnaires were administered to users using the availability sampling techniques. Frequency and percentages were the main statistics used for the analysis of the data. The study established that effectiveness of library services constitutes an important aspect of librarianship and the library staff performed their duties effectively.
A Kansas library district used Tapestry, an Esri data product, and analysis provided by a GIS consulting firm to learn more about its patrons so it can better identify their needs, develop and manage services delivery, and market its services effectively.
Market segmentation is well known in the business community, which has used it successfully for many years for ongoing activities such as business expansion, site selection, competitive analysis, marketing campaigns, and many other common business procedures. However, it is gaining increasing use among public entities, such as libraries that need a greater understanding of users so that they can better serve them. Tapestry Segmentation classifies U.S. neighborhoods into 65 distinctive segments based on their socioeconomic and demographic composition. The analysis also provides lifestyle information including interests and buying habits.
When recently faced with preparing a strategic plan called The Next Decade, Gina Millsap, executive director of the Topeka and Shawnee County Public Library (TSCPL) in Topeka, Kansas, decided to conduct an analysis of her community and its library patrons. "We contracted with CIVICTechnologies to work with us by utilizing GIS data analysis to correlate customer, circulation, materials, and programming attendance statistics with demographic and marketing segmentation data," said Millsap. "It was our hope that this approach, in contrast to the traditional user and community surveys, would tell us much more about who is using the library, how they are using it, what they aren't using, what they might be interested in using, and who isn't using library services."
Esri business partner CIVICTechnologies develops GIS-based solutions for public agencies and nonprofit organizations. In this case, the goal of the analysis was to identify underserved segments, assess their needs, develop appropriate resources to meet those needs and deliver those services, and implement a marketing campaign targeted at selected segments. This analytic process began with mapping the relationships between patrons and nonpatrons and examining checkouts, material types, and market segments.
"Service to juveniles and young adults is also very important to the TSCPL program. We ranked the potential to increase youth patronage and checkouts in each of the 30 segments. The Home Town segment, for example, has a good potential for increasing youth patronage and checkouts, as evidenced by its dominant share of youth checkouts. The behavior of youth in census block groups with high checkouts can serve as a model for increasing checkouts in the census block groups with the lowest checkouts."
Another important result of the analysis came from comparing print and nonprint materials by segment. Nonprint materials were highly favored by segments whose characteristics include close proximity to the library; modest incomes; and a diverse range of household types, ages, and life stages. TSCPL is currently developing targeted marketing programs to increase use of both print and non-print materials in these segments and identify other segments with similar characteristics that are likely to use these resources.
The analysis has provided the library with a great deal of information about their current and potential users within the determined market segments. For example, those living farthest from the library are located in Shawnee County and are members of the area's largest population segment called Green Acres, which is spread throughout the rural parts of the county. Segment characteristics indicate that it is family oriented, well educated, middle class, and not ethnically diverse. It is also one of the most underserved library segments within the TSCPL. There are 23,999 people in this segment and 9,409 of them have a library account, which means that 61 percent of this group are not current library users. The segment represents 13.7 percent of the total population of the Topeka and Shawnee County area and 10.7 percent of the area's library customers. In addition, for those in this area that use library services, these patrons check out 1.32 items every couple of months. The TSCPL analysis has shown that to meet the needs of the overall community, service must be improved for this particular segment. TSCPL is currently considering various options, such as increased bookmobile visits, books-by-mail services, services through local schools, or opening local storefront facilities.
After completing the analysis, the library was able to identify trends, patterns of usage, service, collection, and programming preferences, as well as barriers to using the library, most of which they were previously unaware of. Concluded Millsap, "Tapestry data has been especially helpful in getting to know our customers by looking at their lifestyle choices, consumer buying habits, and so on, as well as basic demographic information and comparing that to how they use (or don't use) the library. We now have a very clear picture of our open market potential, and we're beginning to understand the strategies we need to pursue to increase satisfaction of existing customers, increase usage of existing customers, and grow our customer base from 94,000 account holders to approach the 173,000 people that live in our service area.
"My own epiphany about planning after working for more than 30 years as a professional librarian is that the line between a library's strategic plan and its marketing/communications plan has begun to blur and merge. It is really all about connecting with people and building relationships built on real knowledge about each other. And the data that drives that is the GIS analysis."
I blog often and I genuinely thank you for your content. The article has truly peaked my interest. I will take a note of your website and keep checking for new details about once per week. I opted in for your RSS feed as well.
I used to be more than happy to find this web-site.I needed to thanks on your time for this glorious learn!! I positively having fun with each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to take a look at new stuff you weblog post.
Yes Special library have special users and special content. There is a good example of Medical librarianship which is type of special library. They have special collection and special users. Similarly Banks and Media library are so considered as special library as per the users and respective collection. Thank you feel free to write me an email usu...@gmail.com you still need more clarification.
Hi there ? I created React Testing Library because I wasn't satisfied with thetesting landscape at the time. It expanded to DOM Testing Library and now wehave Testing Library implementations (wrappers) for every popular JavaScriptframework and testing tool that targets the DOM (and even some that don't).
As time has gone on, we've made some small changes to the API and we'vediscovered suboptimal patterns. Despite our efforts to document the "better way"to use the utilities we provide, I still see blog posts and tests writtenfollowing these suboptimal patterns and I'd like to go through some of these,explain why they're not great and how you can improve your tests to avoid thesepitfalls.
The name wrapper is old cruft from enzyme and we don't need that here. Thereturn value from render is not "wrapping" anything. It's simply a collectionof utilities that (thanks to the next thing) you should actually not often needanyway.
The benefit of using screen is you no longer need to keep the render calldestructure up-to-date as you add/remove the queries you need. You only need totype screen. and let your editor's magic autocomplete take care of the rest.
93ddb68554