realizations not in plan are executed anyway?

[Nathan Schneider]

Hi,

I’m using ducttape-0.3 with a modified version of the cdec tutorial, and am noticing unexpected behavior with plans.

Right now I have a plan like

plan P {
  reach extract_gra via (ExtractSection: dev)
}

and am invoking it via the command line: ducttape workflow.tape -p P. Strangely, it says it will run extract_gra with ExtractSection:dev (and its prerequisites), as well as a realization which I have not requested: ExtractSection:devtest (the other branch of ExtractSection). Am I misunderstanding how plans are supposed to work, or is that behavior unexpected?

The inputs to extract_gra are:

 < corpus=(DataSeg: plain=(ExtractSection: dev=$out@preproc_corpus[DataSection:dev] devtest=$out@preproc_corpus[DataSection:devtest]) mwe=(ExtractSection: dev=$mwetokenized@mwe_tokenize[DataSection:dev] devtest=$mwetokenized@mwe_tokenize[DataSection:devtest]))
 < ini=$ini@index_training

I ran ducttape mtlab.tape -p P viz to generate the attached graph; essentially I am wondering why the bottom left realization is ever reached under this plan.

Any insights?

Thanks,

Nathan

[Greg Hanneman]

I'm afraid I'm no help, but the same thing is happening to me and others at Safaba in one of our pipelines.  We're similarly confused as to why the non-requested realization ever gets run when the plan doesn't select for it.  This is also with version 0.3.

Greg.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ducttape-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ducttape-user...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[Jon Clark]

Sounds like a bug.

Nathan: Can you open an issue on github and attach the description and full workflow? Bonus points if you can find a minimal workflow that repros.

Sent from my Windows Phone

---

From: Greg Hanneman
Sent: ‎12/‎16/‎2013 6:33 AM
To: Nathan Schneider
Cc: ducttap...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: realizations not in plan are executed anyway?

[Nathan Schneider]

Voilà—the behavior is pretty simple to describe: https://github.com/jhclark/ducttape/issues/162

Cheers,

Nathan

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Jon Clark <jon.h...@gmail.com> wrote:

Sounds like a bug.

Nathan: Can you open an issue on github and attach the description and full workflow? Bonus points if you can find a minimal workflow that repros.

Sent from my Windows Phone

---

From: Greg Hanneman
Sent: 12/16/2013 6:33 AM

[Jon Clark]

Thanks Nathan. This should shave some time off my debug cycle. No ETA on a fix right now -- I want to wrap up a thesis chapter before diving into this.

Sent from my Windows Phone

---

From: Nathan Schneider
Sent: ‎12/‎16/‎2013 2:39 PM
To: Jon Clark
Cc: Greg Hanneman; ducttap...@googlegroups.com

[Chris Dyer]

Like.

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Jon Clark <jon.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Nathan. This should shave some time off my debug cycle. No ETA on a
> fix right now -- I want to wrap up a thesis chapter before diving into this.
>
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Nathan Schneider

> Sent: 12/16/2013 2:39 PM

[Jonathan Clark]

TACL paper done = Bug fixed: https://github.com/jhclark/ducttape/issues/162

Any volunteers to do 0.3.1 testing & release?