In DSI-Studio, selecting GQI during [Step T2] typically results in a good fiber tracking outcome, with the neural pathways appearing normal.
However, if QSDR is chosen with the template set to INDI_rhesus at the same step, the resulting neural trajectories may become disorganized (as depicted in the upper figure, Green color appears at the position of the corpus callosum; and the surface looks like the wind blowing through the grass depicted in the below figure)
The reason for choosing QSDR is based on recommendations from the guide website (https://dsi-studio.labsolver.org/doc/gui_t3_dt.html), which suggests that Type 2 is more suitable for my study involving animal subjects (My animal subjects are macaques,)
I appreciate your insights and guidance on this matter.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSI Studio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dsi-studio+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dsi-studio/331f7391-3303-4ef6-8fbc-396f263e89f9n%40googlegroups.com.
What are the reasons for recommending the use of QSDR? Is it because they are animals?
For animal data, it is recommended to register each timepoint data to template space?
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dsi-studio/42b41616-e030-48b2-a1b4-17ce84547c20n%40googlegroups.com.

