A Question Regarding Evaluating the FIB Files with Different Diffusion Sampling Length Ratio

[maedeh khalilian]

Dear Frank

I have got that using different diffusion sampling length ratios significantly change my results. But the problem is that although I have checked the document ,I still don't exactly know how to find which ratio has resolved crossing patterns better .  I will send you 2 of my fib files created with 2 length ratio 0.5 and 1.25.If possible I would be grateful if you could check and let me know which has done a better estimation and how I can get it myself.   

Best regards,

Maedeh

[Frank Yeh]

1.25 is better. You may check the coronal slice around (55,55,60) to
see the difference just like the figures at
http://dsi-studio.labsolver.org/Manual/Reconstruction#TOC-Generalized-Q-sampling-Imaging-GQI-

Best,
Frank

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSI Studio" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dsi-studio+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dsi-studio/e37c622f-32fb-4f3d-bf69-72ac4bc4c5c5o%40googlegroups.com.

[maedeh khalilian]

Yes, I got the point...
Thank you very much dear Frank.

On 8 Mar 2021 13:55, "Frank Yeh" <fran...@gmail.com> wrote:

1.25 is better. You may check the coronal slice around (55,55,60) to
see the difference just like the figures at
http://dsi-studio.labsolver.org/Manual/Reconstruction#TOC-Generalized-Q-sampling-Imaging-GQI-

Best,
Frank

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:09 AM maedeh khalilian <maede...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Frank
> I have got that using different diffusion sampling length ratios significantly change my results. But the problem is that although I have checked the document ,I still don't exactly know how to find which ratio has resolved crossing patterns better .  I will send you 2 of my fib files created with 2 length ratio 0.5 and 1.25.If possible I would be grateful if you could check and let me know which has done a better estimation and how I can get it myself.
> Best regards,
> Maedeh
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSI Studio" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dsi-studio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dsi-studio/e37c622f-32fb-4f3d-bf69-72ac4bc4c5c5o%40googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSI Studio" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dsi-studio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dsi-studio/CAG_QrtJM_kOs5PfapHNbkzzW6dVMGYnYNHghf_EMEwHjq%3DENOA%40mail.gmail.com.

[maedeh khalilian]

Dear Frank

Beside the visual result, Is there a measurement in DSI Studio that can quantify the estimation of crossing fibers? (as an evidence to report in the paper) 

Best 

Maedeh 

On Monday, March 8, 2021 at 1:55:32 PM UTC+1, Frank Yeh wrote:

1.25 is better. You may check the coronal slice around (55,55,60) to
see the difference just like the figures at
http://dsi-studio.labsolver.org/Manual/Reconstruction#TOC-Generalized-Q-sampling-Imaging-GQI-

Best,
Frank

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:09 AM maedeh khalilian <maede...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Frank
> I have got that using different diffusion sampling length ratios significantly change my results. But the problem is that although I have checked the document ,I still don't exactly know how to find which ratio has resolved crossing patterns better .  I will send you 2 of my fib files created with 2 length ratio 0.5 and 1.25.If possible I would be grateful if you could check and let me know which has done a better estimation and how I can get it myself.
> Best regards,
> Maedeh
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSI Studio" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dsi-s...@googlegroups.com.

[Frank Yeh]

Sorry currently there is no such an index, but I can come up with one
(e.g. similarity with the template) in the near future.

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 9:10 AM maedeh khalilian <maede...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Frank
> Beside the visual result, Is there a measurement in DSI Studio that can quantify the estimation of crossing fibers? (as an evidence to report in the paper)
> Best
> Maedeh
>
> On Monday, March 8, 2021 at 1:55:32 PM UTC+1, Frank Yeh wrote:
>>
>> 1.25 is better. You may check the coronal slice around (55,55,60) to
>> see the difference just like the figures at
>> http://dsi-studio.labsolver.org/Manual/Reconstruction#TOC-Generalized-Q-sampling-Imaging-GQI-
>>
>> Best,
>> Frank
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:09 AM maedeh khalilian <maede...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear Frank
>> > I have got that using different diffusion sampling length ratios significantly change my results. But the problem is that although I have checked the document ,I still don't exactly know how to find which ratio has resolved crossing patterns better . I will send you 2 of my fib files created with 2 length ratio 0.5 and 1.25.If possible I would be grateful if you could check and let me know which has done a better estimation and how I can get it myself.
>> > Best regards,
>> > Maedeh
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSI Studio" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dsi-s...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dsi-studio/e37c622f-32fb-4f3d-bf69-72ac4bc4c5c5o%40googlegroups.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSI Studio" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dsi-studio+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dsi-studio/cfe9f36a-08b6-4928-b008-7347105d7f7bo%40googlegroups.com.

[maedeh khalilian]

Thanks more

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dsi-studio/CAG_QrtKCr8gsNVY7FOz%3D3ov3Ahq%2BPwdMjZ_BGwTCW3j6HDm8AA%40mail.gmail.com.