Hi
I do not think that the current frsky implementation of frsky for pixhawk consume that much ressources.
I did not look into it yet but the only issue on apm indeed is to find a free serial port.
However the current implementation works only for D receiver not X receiver( s port) . sport is a bit more challenging but I am working on it.
M
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "drones-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to drones-discus...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hey
I have not looked at APM for a very long time but if uart2 is available, I will have a look. Limitation about d port is OK with you ?
M
Thanks very much for your attention.