Tire Machine Manual

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Sherley

unread,
Aug 3, 2024, 12:37:42 PM8/3/24
to drapensekel

Looking for advice on the cheap, manual tire changers. Reviews are mixed, not that I put a lot of faith in them. So I am asking you guys for real world user input. I don't have the space or need to buy a tire machine. It would see occasional use for trailer, wagon and front tractor tires with the occasional lawnmower tire for good measure. Thanks in advance.

Can't say on anything current but I know years ago buddy's dad had a manual tire changer in his garage. We used it a lot and I don't recall bending or breaking anything. But it was probably heavier duty than some available now?

I have a rim clamp machine now that works pretty good for tractor fronts as well as wagon tires and can change out and fix our car tired as well on aluminum wheels. I can do up to 20" rims. I have around a 1000 in it. My guess is you will need roughly the same working floor space wether it be a manual or powered machine.

I did buy a harbor freight one and it worked real well. I would recommend two things though! On the piece that presses on the bead would be to weld in a piece between the two strips that hold the piece that pushes the bead. The other is to make a stronger bar that installs the bead back on the rim. I changed out four tires in less than two hours. I mounted it on the center of the garage floor and remove it when not in use.

i had one from Gemplers that i mounted in the middle of a 4x4 sheet of 3/4" plywood that had 2x10's nailed on the back side for added support, that way i could stand on it so it wouldn't move around but yet i was able to move out of the way when not in use.

-garage/tire-changers/weaver-w-898xs-tire-changer/

One of the tire shops around here uses this one. He is one of the cheapest places around and does a lot of tires. The list price on the base model is 1300. If I upgrade to a rim clamp machine I would probably try one.

Many small town service stations are either going out of business or raising their cost on tire repairs which has forced many farmers and consumers to repair their own tires. While many good tire changers cost at least $2,000 and up to $6,000 it is hard to justify the cost of owning a rim clamp tire changer. This machine also features a manual balancer so you can make sure your tires are balanced after you mount them. Watch the video on how to use this machine.

It requires no electricity or air and you don't have to heat your shop to keep it from freezing up. We also have many other time and money saving machines to fit whatever your tire changing needs are.

Our Tire Changing Machines are first class and comes with 12 month warranty! We fully stock parts and accessories for our machines as well. Please view the last picture for available accessories and call us to add to your order. We have different models with different capabilities available for a variety of needs. Please Call with Questions 1-888-513-8473

We buy by the semi load to save YOU money. We have over 30 years experience and several warehouses full of tires. If you don't see the quantity, size or brand you are needing email us or give us a call at 1-888-513-8473. Check out our other auctions for more great deals.

Remove worn tires from rims and remount them quickly and easily with this manual tire changer. This tire changer needs no power hookups or pneumatic lines to operate, and is suitable for all tires from 8 in. to light truck tires.

Tire changers are essential tools in any garage, enabling the removal and installation of tires from vehicle wheels. They come in two main types: hydraulic and manual. Each has its unique features, benefits, and challenges. But to give insights into the hydraulic vs. manual tire changer debate, here are the pros and cons of each type:

Manual tire changers are tools used to remove and install tires onto the rims of vehicle wheels. They differ significantly from their automatic or semi-automatic counterparts in their operation, requiring more physical effort and skill from the user. Understanding the pros, cons, and ideal situations for using manual tire changers can help determine when they are the best choice.

Manual tire changers consist of a stand with a clamping mechanism to hold the wheel in place and a lever-operated tool to pry the tire off the rim. These devices require the user to physically manipulate the tire and rim, using the lever to break the tire bead and then pry the tire away from the rim. The process is then reversed to install a new tire.

Hydraulic tire changers are automotive equipment designed to remove and install tires on vehicle wheels. They utilize hydraulic systems to apply controlled pressure, making changing tires more efficient and less labor-intensive than manual methods.

A hydraulic tire changer operates using a hydraulic system that generates force through the compression of fluid, typically oil. This system powers various components of the tire changer, such as the bead breaker, turntable, and mounting/demounting tool.

We invite you to explore our extensive collection of top-tier tire changers, including state-of-the-art hydraulic models designed to streamline your workflow and enhance efficiency. Whether you're a professional auto shop looking for speed and precision or a commercial enterprise needing robust and reliable equipment, JMC Equipment has the perfect solution for you.

The employer is a large tire manufacturing company, producing numerous types of tires for agriculture machinery. The tire assembly plant employed 1,600, and had been in operation since 1945. There were four 12-hour shifts of workers, and the plant was normally open 24 hours a day, 354 days each year. The victim and a co-worker had worked together at this tire machine for the previous 2-3 months. Both of them had many years of experience working in other departments at this tire plant.

The union was actively involved in developing proactive safety and health programs at the facility. Training on this machine was done by letting new workers work side-by-side with others, then only after a time of observation, being allowed to work alone.

The tire plant generally produces agricultural tires, and this tire machine was used to build prototype large flotation-type tires for agricultural sprayers. This Japanese machine, being one of two in the country, had been in use at this plant for the past 10 years. All its controls and manuals were written in Japanese and translated into English. Other tire machines in the facility were American made.

The large L-shaped machine normally required a three-person team, two for assembly and one for servicing. If a third person was not available, it could be operated with only two workers. The two assemblers work in separate locations, approximately 20 feet apart. This crew would produce about 15 large flotation tires per work shift.

The tire assembly machine built prototype radial-ply tires, which differed significantly in tire content, thickness, and building procedures from other bias-ply agricultural tires produced at the facility. Software controlling the machine was not specifically programmed for the type of prototype tire being built. Repairs to the machine were common and the computerized machining process allowed the operator to place the machine in manual mode.

While making the first tire on the day shift, the machine experienced a mechanical malfunction and was shut down. A maintenance crew was brought in and asked the victim to cut the partially built tire off the drum so the problem could be repaired. After the tire assembly machine was repaired, it was put in manual mode, backed up to zero, and put back into production. The machine began to operate starting at the previous tire operating cycle. The workers had taken their positions to begin the next tire, assuming that the machine was starting at the beginning of a tire production cycle, when the accident occurred. In mid-cycle the machine moved according to residual computerized command and control information that had remained in its active computer memory from the previous tire, and caught the victim in a movement that was never expected. The man was severely crushed in the left abdominal and pelvic region. Co-workers called for assistance and removed the man from the machine. The injured worker remained conscious and alert before transport to the hospital, and during his evaluation prior to exploratory surgery. He suffered a massive crush injury to his left abdominal and pelvic region, and continued to deteriorate, dying one month later.

The tire company had another similar Japanese tire assembly machine located at a facility in another state. Company officials notified the remote facility, and that machine was immediately shut down. Japanese company officials, who were at the remote plant, arrived at the tire plant within a few days and were able to duplicate the circumstances, which caused the malfunction. The operating software for the machine was subsequently updated with five safety features, and multiple mechanical safeguards were incorporated into the tire-building process to prevent recurrence. These software improvements included built-in redundancy to check for proper positioning of materials and personnel, before initiating machine movements. Hardware improvements included installation of light curtains, pressure-sensitive mats, and movable platforms, all designed to ensure that employees are prepared for the next machine movement. Certain procedures requiring optional manual mode were changed to automatic only.

Recommendation #1: Employers should ensure that machines are safeguarded to protect all employees in the machine area. Computerized machining processes should allow the machine to operate in fail-to-safe mode during and following repairs or general maintenance. Lockout/tagout requirements specified in 29 CFR 1919.147 shall be followed (if employees are not protected by machine guarding).

Discussion: The requirements of the Machine Guarding Standard 29 CFR 1910.212 require that machines be designed and constructed as to prevent employees from having any part of their body in a danger zone. Operators and other employees in the machine area shall be protected with one or more methods of guarding from such hazards as those created by; pointsof- operation, ingoing nip points and rotating parts. Moreover, the machining process should be maintained such that if one component fails, it shuts down the process to a fail-to-safe mode. When properly installed, the system will shut down to a fail-to-safe mode when safe operating conditions are not met. The system should also contain hardware integration so it cannot be bypassed by other control circuitry or hardware. One example of an engineering control is a presence-sensing device (light curtain) that may be installed to ensure conditions are met before the machine begins operation. Additionally, in this situation the prototype tire differed significantly, and the computerized software was not re-programmed for the specific process for the prototype tire. Nor were prevention guards installed or devices installed to control the machine. When the above is not accomplished for normal production operations, then the Lockout/tagout Standard is applicable. All servicing and maintenance operations where potential hazards are related to the unexpected energization or unexpected movement, the machinery or equipment shall be rendered to a safe position. Therefore, Lockout/tagout programs, machine specific procedures, training (including retraining) and periodic inspections shall be utilized.

c80f0f1006
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages