Ez Mirror Match Download
Theola Dolgas
I know this is how Play Mode was designed, matching up similar rarity decks to prevent mature players taking advantages on new players. But no one likes mirror match up all the time. Could you cluster decks with their similarity? If a player meets a deck in Cluster A, then lower the possibility of Cluster A when he plays the next game.
It's best to play MTGA against Sparky because you'll have 100% win rate and those decks are really random.
That's the end game boss and is so satisfying to beat. If they only allowed wins against Sparky to count with the daily quests then that would be the best! Thanks Wizards, I love MTGA due to the Sparky mirror matches.
Silly pleb, you think that Wizards of the Coast cares about their players? Corporate greed is all they care about. With every patch it gets worse. Lose to a deck? Get matched against it three times in a row until you beat it then they will find another deck that you usually lose too. Too many losses in a row? Okay, here is a really easy opponent - only one - and then we will beat you down with netdeck simps again.
I 100% agree. Every time I make a new deck I face a mirror match of that deck, sometimes down to the exact same Legendary cards I have.
Recently I made a white/black lifelink build. I really like the deck but, since I built it a few days ago around 80% of my opponents have the same deck.
It honestly makes the whole game stale, repetitive and BORING!!!!!!
It's really unfortunate because my favorite thing about Magic is building new decks and testing out different cards together. When you always go against those exact same cards it's simply not fun anymore.
I think the matchmaking should be completely random and not based on your deck. Just match people in the same Tier as each other and PLEASE STOP The mirror matches. It will be the reason I stop playing this game altogether and have already played a LOT less than I would if it didn't have this matchmaking algorithim.
Sometimes, the game is fun when you are on a winstreak with your deck. However, your rigged matchmaker as well as shuffler just give me the same amount of loses right after. I don't know how often I have lost my mind due to your ****** plot to make money. And it's not just in some cases, it's continous, may also be because every little boon is now playing with top tier decks because you implemented the ****** export and import features. All PEOPLE suddenly turned pro, even BRONZE PLAYERS can beat me because they play ****** mono red or mirror me by playing mono white.
When i play mono red i face 10 mirrors, one gruul, then 10 mirrors. When i play dimir rogues its the same, 10 mirrors and 1 dimir control deck. Im so tired of this that i no longer want to keep playing ;MTG
Well I retopologized the object and now I am having trouble with the mirror of it. It keeps mirroring int he wrong area and is not matching up equally. Also my verticies at the end of my mesh that would connect the mirror are not alligned properly. Can someonehelp. I have pictures below.
Strategically, mirror matches often present quite a different experience than other matchups, with the player forced to adopt a different approach than usually aimed for. In addition, the precise choice of cards for the deck may vary depending on the predicted percentage of mirror matchups: a deck that is ideally built to face any other class may find itself at a disadvantage when facing a mirror with slightly different tech choices.
Mirror matches between control decks can be extremely drawn-out affairs, with Control Warrior mirror matches especially being some of the longest and slowest in the game. The tendency to focus on reactive gameplay can make these matches extremely passive, while the complex strategies underlying the decks can result in extremely deep decision making. In contrast, mirror matches between aggro decks are generally the quickest in the game, with both decks aiming for victory in the first few rounds, and the decks' reach and lack of defensive cards ensuring neither side lasts too long.
Victory in mirror matches may be decided by several factors, often quite different than those normally focused upon. Aggro decks usually triumph through their reckless and short-lived burst damage, but in a mirror match, victory may be decided by which player is better able to remove the opponent's minions and control the board, exhausting their momentum. Control mirror matches such as Control Warrior may be decided by which deck is able to outlast the other, with play focused on gaining Armor. While such decks usually revolve around drawing cards, in mirror matches these decks may intentionally avoid card draw, and even try to force the opponent to draw cards. Combo decks and control decks revolving around dealing burst damage are usually decided more by who can achieve their win condition first, unless the deck includes a viable means of countering the opponent's coup de grace - in which case play often becomes a waiting game, with each player trying to guess if the other has found their combo yet, and having to choose either to unleash their own finishing move - and risk having it defeated - or lay in wait to ambush the opponent once their patience wears out.
Mirror matches sometimes bring some very specific new factors into play, due to the mutual synergy of the decks. Most commonly, minion type synergies often allow for unexpected plays due to related cards. Perhaps the most dramatic example of this is a Demon Warlock deck featuring Lord Jaraxxus, which was once immensely vulnerable to Sacrificial Pact. When Jaraxxus was common in the meta, some Demonlock mirror matches intentionally avoided playing it, even if playing it would apparently spell victory, due to the likelihood of the opponent immediately destroying them. Murloc mirror matches used to be plagued by cross-deck synergy, due to cards like Grimscale Oracle, Murloc Warleader, Murloc Tidecaller, and Coldlight Seer which used to benefit all Murlocs, regardless of which player they belong to, with only Old Murk-Eye still being able to benefit from the opponent's Murlocs. Similar to the case with Sacrificial Pact, in the right meta Hungry Crab may be included in Murloc decks, serving as a kind of self-consuming buff card in most matchups, but also as a very effective counter in mirror matches.
In gaming, a mirror match is a match in which players use the same character, faction, deck, etc. to fight each other. For example, a Super Smash Bros. mirror match might consist of two players fighting each other as Fox. Or, a Magic: The Gathering (MTG) mirror match might consist of two players battling each other with identical (or nearly identical) Blue-White Control decks.
The term mirror match comes from the original Mortal Kombat. In the game's single-player mode, players eventually had to fight against the character as whom they were playing. The game called this match the Mirror Match.
In most fighting games, a slight color variation allows players to differentiate between the otherwise identical combatants during mirror matches. However, most players who have fought a mirror match know the sting of mistaking which character they're controlling ...
I've had a situation a few times when I started playing chess against other novice players in which I was white, they were black. Their strategy was to mirror every single move that I did. Skilled players can easily dismantle this stupid crap, but beginners are often at a loss as to what to do. If you are a beginner at the game and are stuck as to what to do against a person who does this, simply follow the moves in the diagram to:
I meet this 'mirroring' problem from time to time when I play the King's Indian Attack. And I'm not sure, honestly, at which point and in what way to break a symmetry in an adventageous manner... Any suggestions?
"Hang the DJ" is the fourth episode of the fourth series of the British anthology series Black Mirror. It was written by series creator Charlie Brooker and directed by Tim Van Patten. The episode first aired on Netflix, along with the rest of series four, on 29 December 2017. It follows Amy (Georgina Campbell) and Frank (Joe Cole), who are matched into relationships for fixed lengths of time by an algorithm that eventually determines their life-long partner.
Frank (Joe Cole) and Amy (Georgina Campbell) use a circular device called "Coach" that matches them with partners for fixed periods of time. They are matched together for 12 hours. Despite initial nerves, they quickly get on and regret not having sex as they part. Coach (voice of Gina Bramhill) tells them the system monitors each relationship to assign them a lifelong partner on "pairing day", with a success rate of 99.8%.
Frank's next match Nicola (Gwyneth Keyworth) immediately disdains him, but they are paired for a year. Meanwhile, Amy finds her nine-month match Lenny (George Blagden) attractive. Amy and Frank meet again, at an event where a couple talk about their successful pairing. Amy begins to find Lenny's mannerisms tiresome, particularly his heavy exhalations. After the relationship ends, she is repeatedly matched with people for 36 hours; having sex with each match, she begins to dissociate over the matches' pointlessness.
After Frank's match ends, he and Amy are matched again and they agree not to check the time length, to avoid preconceptions. They enjoy having sex for the first time and talk about how the system might work. One night, Frank checks the expiry date. It initially says five years but recalibrates, as Frank's betrayal of their agreement has destabilised it, until it reads 20 hours. Frank is distracted the next day as Amy notices every pebble she skips hits the water four times; he admits what has happened with an hour remaining. She is furious and he is heartbroken.
The plot twist is revealed in a scene where the simulated world disassembles pixel by pixel to be replaced by 1000 copies of Frank and Amy in a black void. This was only described vaguely in the script, so the production took inspiration from 2013 science fiction film Under the Skin, according to producer Nick Pitt. The cast were confused about the intention during filming for this ending, particularly the footage taken against green screens of characters looking "meaningfully into the middle distance". Jones and Brooker found that their partners did not understand the initial cuts of the ending. To establish that the episode's setting had been a simulation, disembodied voice and text reveal that Amy and Frank had "rebelled" 998 out of 1000 times, leading to a 99.8% match for the pair, and dialogue in the previous restaurant scene was simplified. Additionally, visual effects developments led to characters "dematerialising" by a "graceful leaving of their body" rather than "being broken, squashed or incinerated", according to Pitt.[7]
760c119bf3