Re: doozerd Performance Test - Doozerd Crashes on heavy workload

274 views
Skip to first unread message

Stephen Major

unread,
Jan 25, 2013, 4:13:23 PM1/25/13
to doo...@googlegroups.com

While not an expert on the interworkings of doozerd it does state under use cases that it is intented for infrequently changing data.... this would indicate that it is not supposed to handle nosql write performance.

On Jan 25, 2013 12:55 PM, "Dayal D" <dday...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

I am running tests to benchmark the performance of Doozerd. I am using ruby fraggle client to get asynchronous test.

I tried running a test where I add nearly 100,000 messages to Doozerd. In that test, Doozerd server crashes always. The jist of the logs are like this:

----- goroutine created by -----
doozer/server.*txn·set+0xe0 /home/kr/src/doozerd/src/pkg/server/txn.go:108

goroutine 505656 [4]:
runtime.gosched+0x5c /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:603
    runtime.gosched()
runtime.chanrecv+0x177 /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/chan.c:361
    runtime.chanrecv(0xfc3b034840, 0x7f0197de9dc8, 0x0, 0x0, 0xfc3b034840, ...)
runtime.chanrecv1+0x4a /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/chan.c:424
    runtime.chanrecv1(0xfc3b034840, 0xfc3f8f67a0)
doozer/peer.*proposer·Propose+0x1fb /home/kr/src/doozerd/src/pkg/peer/peer.go:42
    doozer/peer.*proposer·Propose(0xf840046540, 0xfc3ef3e800, 0x7d0000007d, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
doozer/consensus.Set+0x113 /home/kr/src/doozerd/src/pkg/consensus/consensus.go:19
    doozer/consensus.Set(0xf84002e540, 0xf840046540, 0xfc3f8f62a0, 0x10, 0xfa206c3f00, ...)
doozer/server._func_002+0x8a /home/kr/src/doozerd/src/pkg/server/txn.go:101
    doozer/server._func_002(0xfc3e582e18, 0x410c49)
runtime.goexit /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:178
    runtime.goexit()
----- goroutine created by -----
doozer/server.*txn·set+0xe0 /home/kr/src/doozerd/src/pkg/server/txn.go:108

goroutine 505653 [4]:
runtime.gosched+0x5c /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:603
    runtime.gosched()
runtime.chanrecv+0x177 /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/chan.c:361
    runtime.chanrecv(0xfc3f41d0b0, 0x7f0197de6dc8, 0x0, 0x0, 0xfc3f41d0b0, ...)
runtime.chanrecv1+0x4a /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/chan.c:424
    runtime.chanrecv1(0xfc3f41d0b0, 0xfc3ef38fa0)
doozer/peer.*proposer·Propose+0x1fb /home/kr/src/doozerd/src/pkg/peer/peer.go:42
    doozer/peer.*proposer·Propose(0xf840046540, 0xfc3ef48180, 0x7d0000007d, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
doozer/consensus.Set+0x113 /home/kr/src/doozerd/src/pkg/consensus/consensus.go:19
    doozer/consensus.Set(0xf84002e540, 0xf840046540, 0xfc3ef38ee0, 0x10, 0xfc39cbaaa0, ...)
doozer/server._func_002+0x8a /home/kr/src/doozerd/src/pkg/server/txn.go:101
    doozer/server._func_002(0xfc3e582a28, 0x410c49)
runtime.goexit /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:178
    runtime.goexit()
----- goroutine created by -----
doozer/server.*txn·set+0xe0 /home/kr/src/doozerd/src/pkg/server/txn.go:108

goroutine 23 [4]:
runtime.gosched+0x5c /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:603
    runtime.gosched()
runfinq+0x50 /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/mgc0.c:671
    runfinq()
runtime.goexit /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:178
    runtime.goexit()
----- goroutine created by -----
runtime.gc /home/kr/src/go/src/pkg/runtime/mgc0.c:547


Please provide some insight on this.

Stephen Major

unread,
Jan 25, 2013, 4:15:24 PM1/25/13
to doo...@googlegroups.com

100, 000 asynch writes is hardly infrequently changing data

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages