RE: The State of Doozer

[Stephen]

Seems so, I forget the name but if you look on the go project wiki there is a new kid on the block that seems to have everything doozer does and faster due to a different algorithm.

---

From: David Arnold
Sent: ‎1/‎2/‎2014 6:32 PM
To: doo...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: The State of Doozer

So, this whole thread was a while ago now, and there's nothing much happening on github.

What's the current state?  Is doozer dead?

d

On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:45:09 AM UTC+10, Robby Colvin wrote:

I'm hoping to implement doozer for my infrastructure and I'm sad about the state of the project. From what I can tell, the original authors of doozer have moved on to other things and that development has stopped. There are quite a few forks that have been updated, but there is still no canonical repository to my knowledge. There are quite a few commits in the network, though these ones stick out the most:

https://github.com/4ad/doozerd

https://github.com/ActiveState/doozerd

https://github.com/skynetservices/doozerd

I was hoping that we could somehow round everyone up that is still interested in doozer and decide where to go from here. First, is either Keith or Blake still interested in moving forward with the project? If not, should we ask for more members to be added to the organization in order to bring steam back to the project? Or should we create a new organization to host doozer related repos? I understand that Heroku's requirements or situation have changed, but I don't see Zookeeper or DynamoDB as viable options for my situation. I still believe this project has value and would like to hear from everyone else that is using it.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "doozer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to doozer+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[Brian Ketelsen]

You’re thinking of Etcd.  github.com/coreos/etcd

On Jan 2, 2014, at 9:57 PM, Stephen <sma...@gmail.com> wrote:

Seems so, I forget the name but if you look on the go project wiki there is a new kid on the block that seems to have everything doozer does and faster due to a different algorithm.

---

From: David Arnold
Sent: 1/2/2014 6:32 PM

To: doo...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: The State of Doozer

So, this whole thread was a while ago now, and there's nothing much happening on github.

What's the current state?  Is doozer dead?

d

On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:45:09 AM UTC+10, Robby Colvin wrote:

I'm hoping to implement doozer for my infrastructure and I'm sad about the state of the project. From what I can tell, the original authors of doozer have moved on to other things and that development has stopped. There are quite a few forks that have been updated, but there is still no canonical repository to my knowledge. There are quite a few commits in the network, though these ones stick out the most:

https://github.com/4ad/doozerd

https://github.com/ActiveState/doozerd

https://github.com/skynetservices/doozerd

I was hoping that we could somehow round everyone up that is still interested in doozer and decide where to go from here. First, is either Keith or Blake still interested in moving forward with the project? If not, should we ask for more members to be added to the organization in order to bring steam back to the project? Or should we create a new organization to host doozer related repos? I understand that Heroku's requirements or situation have changed, but I don't see Zookeeper or DynamoDB as viable options for my situation. I still believe this project has value and would like to hear from everyone else that is using it.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "doozer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to doozer+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[David Arnold]

Thanks for the pointer guys.

d