Cybercriminals developed the WannaCry ransomware worm that exploited EternalBlue and it spread to an estimated 200,000+ computers across 150 countries with damages ranging from hundreds of millions to billions of dollars before EternalBlue was patched.
For example, an attacker could damage the confidentiality of a computer by installing malware on the computer, the integrity of a web page by injecting malicious code into the web browser, or availability by performing a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack powered by a botnet of trojans.
Due to their automate nature, exploits kits are a popular method of spreading different types of malware and generating profit. Creators of exploits kits may offer their exploit kit as a service or as one-off purchase.
Your organization can mitigate the risk of exploits by installing all software patches as soon as they are released, providing cyber security awareness and OPSEC training and investing in security software like an antivirus, automated leaked credential discovery and data exposure detection.
Your vendors who process sensitive data (e.g. protected health information (PHI), personally identifiable information (PII) or biometric data) can be the targets of corporate espionage or cyber attacks if they have worse cyber security than your organization.
Vendor risk management is an increasingly important part of information risk management, invest in developing a robust third-party risk management framework, vendor management policy and cyber security risk assessment process.
Third-party risk and fourth-party risk are at the heart of many data breaches and data leaks. With the cost of data breach involving third-parties reaching an average of $4.29 million it pays to prevent data breaches.
In short, focus on preventing exploits rather than cleaning them up. Even if you recognize you have been attacked, IP attribution and digital forensics won't always be able to provide you with answers.
In 2016, Yahoo announced that over 1 billion user accounts had been leaked, making it one of the biggest data breaches ever. Attackers were able to gain access because Yahoo was using a weak and outdated hashing algorithm called MD5.
Another famous example is the WannaCry ransomware cryptoworm which exploited the EternalBlue vulnerability. EternalBlue was stolen and leaked by a group called The Shadow Brokers a few months prior to the attack.
Bad actors are constantly finding new ways to attack the security of businesses. One method for these attacks is using exploit kits. These tools target vulnerabilities and often spread malware to make businesses weaker to future attack. Exploit kit attacks happen in multiple stages and target specific types of security vulnerability.
To stay safe from exploit kit attacks, you must know how they work and what makes them successful. With the proper cybersecurity measures, your business can be safe from exploit kit attacks. By diving into examples of exploit kit attacks, you can gain a better understanding of how they function. Protecting your business from exploit kit attacks is an important part of your cybersecurity.
An exploit kit is a toolkit that bad actors use to attack specific vulnerabilities in a system or code. Once they take advantage of these vulnerabilities, they perform other malicious activities like distributing malware or ransomware. These toolkits are named this way because they use exploits, code that takes advantage of security flaws and software vulnerabilities. While exploits can be written by security teams to prove potential threats, they are usually created by attackers.
Some exploit kits deliver malicious ads on commonly visited websites like YouTube and Yahoo. Others take advantage of flaws in commonly used programs like Adobe Flash Player. Exploit kits like these are even linked to other attacks like ransomware against a variety of organizations. Because they are groups of tools, exploit kits typically work on more than one vulnerability. Some well-known examples of exploit kits include:
An exploit kit attack typically happens in the same set of stages, no matter what malware it is carrying or which kind of business is being targeted. This includes exploits such as the zero-day Adobe Reader PDF exploits.
Aside from these standard stages, there is also a two-stage exploit, a type first seen in 2021. These exploits first use a broad attack designed to lure in many people. Then, malware is executed only when those people meet certain criteria. Different exploits target different security vulnerabilities depending on the target of the attack.
There are some vulnerabilities that exploit kits are unable to attack. These theoretical vulnerabilities are not exploitable for a variety of reasons. An attacker might lack enough public information to exploit a vulnerability. Authorization and local system access requirements can also prevent exploit kits from working.
For a client-side exploit kit attack, the exploits initiate from the victim who downloaded the malicious code. An example of this is a fake Google Chrome download that hijacks browser activity and delivers custom ad content. Whether an exploit kit is client-side or server-side, it is designed to take advantage of security vulnerabilities such as:
Protecting against exploit kit attacks means you need to understand where your business is vulnerable and take appropriate security measures. Exploit kits are widely used because they are simple to execute and often result in significant profit for the attacker. There are several steps you can take to protect you and your business from exploit kit attacks.
Patching software frequently so that it remains up to date can help prevent vulnerabilities from building up in your system. Avoiding ads and popups and never clicking on questionable links are also great preventative measures. By abiding by this advice, you can help prevent cyberattacks from harming your business.
Bart is Senior Product Marketing Manager of Threat Intelligence at CrowdStrike and holds +20 years of experience in threat monitoring, detection and intelligence. After starting his career as a network security operations analyst at a Belgian financial organization, Bart moved to the US East Coast to join multiple cybersecurity companies including 3Com/Tippingpoint, RSA Security, Symantec, McAfee, Venafi and FireEye-Mandiant, holding both product management, as well as product marketing roles.
This refers to situations where people are coerced to work for little or no remuneration, often under threat of punishment. There are a number of means through which a person can be coerced, including:
Domestic servitude can be particularly hard to identify as it happens in private households but it is estimated that 16 million people are exploited in the private sector which includes domestic work.
The first of its kind in combining; community empowerment, big data management and anti-trafficking expertise to disrupt, combat and prevent the global issues of human trafficking, modern slavery and exploitation.
Currently there are only 7/9 Exclusion Types (compared to the 9 Exclusion Types in Global Settings/ Global Exclusions) available when adding an exclusion to a threat protection policy. Why are there less options to create granular exclusions at the policy level, but more options at the global level? This seems backwards, because we would want to be more restrictive closer to the endpoint and not the other way around.
Discussion: In an enterprise environment with many users filling a variety of job requirements, the inability to create granular Exploit Mitigation exclusions makes for a cumbersome exclusion process. Yes, this option is available in Global Exclusions, however we may only want to exclude a certain Exploit Mitigation (i.e. Lockdown exploit) from being detected in a given application (i.e. Excel, Adobe, etc.) for only a handful of tens of thousands of computers. In this case, we would want to create a specific policy for a subset of users to which we could apply this exclusion for.
Because of the unique nature of a detection ID/ thumbprint that is assigned to an exploit mitigation event, creating a custom policy and adding a "Detected Exploits" exclusion is not effective. One example is a user who had a custom script that is run on ever-changing Excel reports. The script that gets run on the report is a PowerShell script, and had a handful of commands that could be run. Different commands generated different detection IDs, thus requiring a custom threat protection policy to be created with 7 Detected Exploit exclusions.
I'd request you, not to do any type of exploit mitigation on the computers even if it gets available in the threat protection policy until you are caught up with an unnecessary detection which is false positive and can take time to get resolved. This is the motive behind providing this exclusion because the permanent deployment of any exploit mitigation exclusion can result in unprotected environment and it raises the chances of an attack on the organization.
Hi Jasmin I agree and we do not make any exclusions without first carefully making sure they are false-positives. I am asking for this feature to be added for the purpose of adding exclusions after false-positive has been confirmed by the security operations center. Also, I understand that the permanent deployment of any exploit mitigation exclusion can result in an increased attack vector, but following that same logic, why is it an option to globally make an exclusion like this, but not at the policy level?
Currently for the time being one option is available to exclude the whole group of media, office, Java applications, web browsers and their plug-ins by disabling that option in the threat protection policy under runtime protection section.
An exploit is a piece of code, software, or method used by attackers to take advantage of vulnerabilities or weaknesses in applications, systems, or networks, allowing them to gain unauthorized access or perform malicious actions. Exploits can target vulnerabilities, including software bugs, design flaws, configuration weaknesses, or human errors. By exploiting these vulnerabilities, attackers can execute malicious code, gain unauthorized access to sensitive information, manipulate or disrupt system operations, or escalate their privileges within a compromised system.