Indemnity-cum-Undertaking for taking possession of the Apartment for occupation and use

[Amrut Aiyamma]

Folks,

Got this document from Sadashiv. Unfortunately have to complete signing this by 2/29 and have not time to understand what i am getting into. 

Have you all signed this document? Is there any scope for change? The 3rd para is quite scary

Please do let me know

Thanks

[sanjeev dua]

Just take care in signing this document.

For DLF Westend Heights guys, even for the guys who have taken the posesison a year back (D-block), DLF has sent another demand note, asking for additional amout to be paid and referring to some clause of the "Agreement"

So, even after you get posession, you owe any amount to DLF.

Please take care while signing any more agreements.

We need to find out some solution so that we do not pay anything to DLF, forever !!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DLF Maiden Heights/Woodland heights Rajapura" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dlf-maiden-heights-...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Rama Murthy]

Send a covering letter along with this stating that all these affidavits, letters are not required to be signed under Karnataka Apartment laws and that you are doing so only because DLF is insisting it and that you were left with no choice except to sign the same and you are doing so much against your wishes and without prejudice to your rights available under the laws of the land

Regards

Ram

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Amrut Aiyamma <chendan...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DLF Maiden Heights/Woodland heights Rajapura" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dlf-maiden-heights-...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

Regards

Ram

[kishore patil]

Undertaking document necessary for possession as pet Apartment law, correct?

Kishore

Best Regards,

Kishore

[Rama Murthy]

I don't mind if the undertaking has reasonable lawful conditions. 

Saying that the home owner has no ownership rights on terrace, etc (though repeated as per ABA) are contrary to apartment laws. 

As per apartment laws, the builder cannot claim ownership of terrace rights. Any increase of FSI in future belongs to all the home owners jointly and the builder cannot claim ownership. 

Regards

ram

[sanjeev dua]

DLF uses terraces for advertisement hoardings. Hence the clause

[Rama Murthy]

No. They constructed 10 more floors without the concurrence of home owners and sold them - for this abuse of their dominance, they were fined Rs.630 crores by Competition Commission - read Belaire judgment