Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

Making functions callable

27 views
Skip to first unread message

Anthony Hawkes

unread,
Mar 26, 2014, 4:57:30 PM3/26/14
to django...@googlegroups.com
Hi Guys,

I'm running into a problem with django(I guess this would also affect Python in general) where if I create a view eg
def view(year=today.year())
The year is never re-evaluated until the server is reloaded/restarted

I'm trying to figure out how to make a callable method accessible as a property if this is even possible to try and rectify this(not sure if this is even the correct approach). I've had a look at some magic methods but can't figure it out.

Basically I want to make eg

def year(something):
    return 'blah'

Accessible using object.year as well as object.year()

Any pointers/ideas etc?

John DeRosa

unread,
Mar 26, 2014, 5:07:22 PM3/26/14
to django...@googlegroups.com
For the default value to work as you expect, do this:

def view(request, year=None):
    if year is None:
        year = today.year()


Kwarg defaults are evaluated when the module is interpreted for the first time.

John


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/e7adace8-ffc9-4f77-b970-e73bed5ae8e1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Anthony

unread,
Mar 26, 2014, 6:53:55 PM3/26/14
to django...@googlegroups.com
Thanks John,

I've yet to test it but I read a few people stating to use lambdas variables/properties. Is it definitely the case that it will only evaluate once?

Either way I've embarked on the mission to make methods return as properties and have found @property decorator to fit my needs, the issue was I was calling Object.property not ObjectI().property, However I want to apply this functionality to all my methods and am using:

__getattribute__

    def __getattribute__(self, item):
        super(DateCalc, self).__getattribute__(item)

But I've run into the problem that my __init__ properties don't seem to be initialised eg I get
self._date_actual = datetime.strptime("{Y}-{m}-{d}".format(Y=year, m=month, d=day), self._format_global).date() TypeError: must be string, not None

Anyone have an idea about what's going on?


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/django-users/gcx1oTBAZlA/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to django-users...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Anthony Hawkes
E-Mail: lifesi...@gmail.com
Ph: 0400 372 260

Mike Dewhirst

unread,
Mar 26, 2014, 6:56:04 PM3/26/14
to django...@googlegroups.com
On 27/03/2014 7:57am, Anthony Hawkes wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm running into a problem with django(I guess this would also affect
> Python in general) where if I create a view eg
> def view(year=today.year())
> The year is never re-evaluated until the server is reloaded/restarted
>
> I'm trying to figure out how to make a callable method accessible as a
> property if this is even possible to try and rectify this(not sure if
> this is even the correct approach). I've had a look at some magic
> methods but can't figure it out.
>
> Basically I want to make eg
>
> def year(something):
> return 'blah'

You should be able to pass the callable as an argument. It then gets
evaluated each time it is called ...

Here is one I use ... from time to time :)

def when():
return datetime.now(tz=pytz.utc)


>
> Accessible using object.year as well as object.year()
>
> Any pointers/ideas etc?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Django users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to django-users...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:django-users...@googlegroups.com>.
> To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:django...@googlegroups.com>.
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/e7adace8-ffc9-4f77-b970-e73bed5ae8e1%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

John DeRosa

unread,
Mar 26, 2014, 6:58:27 PM3/26/14
to django...@googlegroups.com
Not sure what is going on without seeing the code. But something is None when it should be a string, as the exception is telling you.

It’s often easiest to try out problem code interactively in Python, and zero in on the problem.

John


Javier Guerra Giraldez

unread,
Mar 26, 2014, 7:00:01 PM3/26/14
to django...@googlegroups.com
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Anthony <lifesi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've yet to test it but I read a few people stating to use lambdas
> variables/properties. Is it definitely the case that it will only evaluate
> once?


from the python docs (2.7):

Default parameter values are evaluated when the function definition is
executed. This means that the expression is evaluated once, when the
function is defined, and that the same “pre-computed” value is used
for each call. This is especially important to understand when a
default parameter is a mutable object, such as a list or a dictionary:
if the function modifies the object (e.g. by appending an item to a
list), the default value is in effect modified. This is generally not
what was intended. A way around this is to use None as the default,
and explicitly test for it in the body of the function.

--
Javier

Anthony Hawkes

unread,
Mar 26, 2014, 8:14:55 PM3/26/14
to django...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Guys, especially Javier! I've spent so much time trawling Google for this info!
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages