[bug]URLField 200 max_length is not enough.

3 views
Skip to first unread message

flyaflya

unread,
May 28, 2007, 4:46:26 AM5/28/07
to django...@googlegroups.com
I have a url, its length is 201.

--
http://www.flyaflya.com

James Bennett

unread,
May 28, 2007, 4:53:54 AM5/28/07
to django...@googlegroups.com
On 5/28/07, flyaflya <flya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a url, its length is 201.

I'm not trying to be mean here, but...

1. We have a public bug-tracking system for bug reports:
http://code.djangoproject.com/timeline
2. Please search the bug-tracking system before reporting an issue;
odds are it's been reported before and someone is working on it or has
posted a patch.
3. A bug was opened for this, a patch was submitted, and a new
"maxlength" argument for URLField was added five months ago:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1477

(and yes, I'm aware that documentation of that change is lacking, but
when reporting a bug it's important to take advantage of the Trac
install to see if something's already been reported or fixed;
duplicate reports take valuable time away from improving Django...)

--
"Bureaucrat Conrad, you are technically correct -- the best kind of correct."

flyaflya

unread,
May 28, 2007, 5:52:51 AM5/28/07
to django...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for tell me this, I know now, I'm not  familiar with open source project process.
--
http://www.flyaflya.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages