{{{
gender = models.BooleanField(
_('gender'),
default=True,
blank=True,
help_text=_('Designates whether the user is a woman.'),
),
}}}
Adding in migration files works fine, but {{{default}}} value does not
(while they're applied in ORM according to
[https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.1/ref/migration-
operations/#addfield])
Then I have added {{{blank=True}}} to counter non-null constraint
violation
When I add gender field in the migration files manually, executing
{{{makemigrations}}} command again generate a delete of that field
{{{gender}}} while I have not removed it in the associate model. **Do we
assume here that it does not see the field at all from the beginning? **
**Please, why? Am I wrong somewhere? **
== Steps to reproduce with my environment project (but optional because I
have tried it in separated project aswell):
- dockerized Postgres 14.4
- dockerized Python 3.8
- Use a CustomUser model by following these instructions (which works
well) : [https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25313#comment:24]
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34117>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
Old description:
New description:
== Problem
Makemigrations command does not see the specific change on models related
to this field below but produces migrations for any other fields (even in
separated project):
{{{
gender = models.BooleanField(
_('gender'),
default=True,
blank=True,
help_text=_('Designates whether the user is a woman.'),
),
}}}
Adding in migration files works fine, but {{{default}}} value does not
(while they're applied in ORM according to
[https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.1/ref/migration-
operations/#addfield])
Then I have added {{{blank=True}}} to counter non-null constraint
violation
When I add gender field in the migration files manually, executing
{{{makemigrations}}} command again generate a delete of that field
{{{gender}}} while I have not removed it in the associate model. **Do we
assume here that it does not see the field at all from the beginning? **
When forcefully staying with that field, trying to run a command to
populate database produces :
{{{
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/django/db/models/base.py",
line 503, in __init__
raise TypeError("%s() got an unexpected keyword argument '%s'" %
(cls.__name__, kwarg))
TypeError: User() got an unexpected keyword argument 'gender'
}}}
**Please, why? Am I wrong somewhere? **
== Steps to reproduce with my environment project (but optional because I
have tried it in separated project aswell):
- dockerized Postgres 14.4
- dockerized Python 3.8
- Use a CustomUser model by following these instructions (which works
well) : [https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25313#comment:24]
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34117#comment:1>
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => invalid
* component: Database layer (models, ORM) => Migrations
Comment:
You have a trailing comma after the field's closing parenthesis which
creates a tuple and thus it isn't detected as a field. In the future,
please see TicketClosingReasons/UseSupportChannels for ways to get help
debugging and create a ticket only for confirmed bugs. Thanks!
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34117#comment:2>