Re: [Django] #7377: "extends" and "block" tags are not available when constructing template from scratch
Django
from scratch
-------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: mgeorge@… | Owner: nobody
Type: Bug | Status: reopened
Milestone: | Component: Template system
Version: SVN | Severity: Normal
Resolution: | Keywords:
Triage Stage: Accepted | Has patch: 1
Needs documentation: 0 | Needs tests: 0
Patch needs improvement: 0 | Easy pickings: 0
UI/UX: 0 |
-------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Changes (by carljm):
* ui_ux: => 0
* easy: => 0
* stage: Design decision needed => Accepted
Comment:
Given Gulopine's comment, I don't see any reason not to treat this as a
bug.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7377#comment:13>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
Django
from scratch
Reporter: mgeorge@… | Owner: nobody
Type: Bug | Status: reopened
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Comment (by andrewbadr):
FWIW all you have to do to get the desired behavior is import
django.template.loader anywhere in your program. Magic!
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7377#comment:14>
Django
from scratch
---------------------------------+------------------------------------
Type: Bug | Status: new
Component: Template system | Version: master
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
---------------------------------+------------------------------------
* owner: nobody => melinath
* status: reopened => new
Comment:
I've made a pull request which fixes this ticket:
https://github.com/django/django/pull/414. This seems to just have been a
matter of adding the loader tags to builtins at the same time that the
defaulttags and defaultfilters are added. Doing so doesn't cause any new
issues to appear... so unless there's something I'm missing, this should
be good to go.
(I don't have tests, but I can't think of a way to add an automated test
for this.)
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7377#comment:15>
Django
from scratch
---------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: mgeorge@… | Owner: melinath
Component: Template system | Version: master
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
---------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by melinath):
* status: new => assigned
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7377#comment:16>
Django
from scratch
---------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: mgeorge@… | Owner: melinath
Type: Bug | Status: assigned
Component: Template system | Version: master
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
---------------------------------+------------------------------------
* needs_tests: 0 => 1
Comment:
@melinath: To test this, you can create a python subprocess that executes
some code snippet in which you only import {{{django.template}}}, but not
the loaders. It's also worth checking what happens in that scenario if I
pass a string to {{{extends}}}.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7377#comment:17>
Django
from scratch
Reporter: mgeorge@… | Owner: melinath
Type: Bug | Status: closed
Component: Template system | Version: master
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 1 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Changes (by anubhav9042):
* status: assigned => closed
* resolution: => worksforme
Comment:
I don't think that this exists anymore in master.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7377#comment:18>