https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/intro/tutorial02/#creating-models
This has a number of limitations:
* Python's type checkers don't understand models.CharField and
models.DateTimeField
* They do understand python strings and datetime objects
* There is some activity on typing-sig about teaching them more about
lengths and limits
dataclasses introduced in 3.7 are seeing some adoption.
The same example can be represented as:
https://github.com/adsharma/fquery/pull/2
This is more ergonomic for python programmers trained on dataclasses.
Queries against these dataclasses can be expressed in one of two ways:
* A method chaining API such as:
https://github.com/adsharma/fquery/blob/main/tests/test_operators.py
* SQL via ActiveRecord or DataMapper
https://github.com/adsharma/dataclasses-
sql/blob/master/tests/test_decorators.py
For this to work as well as current django models, two things need to
happen:
* How to pass additional metadata about database schema? (dataclasses
support metadata, perhaps make it more ergonomic?)
* What to do about indices, views and other db concepts
One school of thought is to use SQL DDL.
Some conversation on this topic here:
https://twitter.com/arundsharma/status/1390898932713066499
Would love to hear more from the django community on the topic.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32759>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
Thanks for the proposition, however I don't think it needs to be built-in
into Django it sounds like a third-party package is the best way to
proceed.
By the way, you'll reach a wider audience if you write to the
DevelopersMailingList about your ideas, see
[https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/internals/contributing/bugs-and-
features/#requesting-features Requesting features].
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32759#comment:1>