* ui_ux: => 0
* easy: => 0
Comment:
See also #16448.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13295#comment:8>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
Comment (by Jadson Ribeiro):
I wonder if there is already a solution after so many years for this
problem?
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13295#comment:9>
* cc: Matti Haavikko (added)
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13295#comment:10>
Comment (by Claude Paroz):
Should this be closed now that #30511 was merged?
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13295#comment:11>
* status: new => closed
* needs_better_patch: 1 => 0
* needs_tests: 1 => 0
* needs_docs: 1 => 0
* has_patch: 1 => 0
* resolution: => wontfix
* stage: Accepted => Unreviewed
Comment:
Replying to [comment:11 Claude Paroz]:
> Should this be closed now that #30511 was merged?
There are still scenarios that could be covered by `Meta.sequence`, e.g.
common sequence for multiple tables. However, since we are using identity
columns on PostgreSQL and Oracle it becomes much more complicated or even
not feasible. I don't think there is a way to move it forward. Closing as
"wontfix".
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13295#comment:12>