Postgres 9.4.1 / 9.5.7 + Django 1.9.5 + psycopg 2.6.1
——
My setup is models/database representing sports events, and with
competitors in different events.
Each competitor in different sports has for their model/class:
class Meta:
unique_together = ('event', 'number')
i.e. ensure a unique starting number in an event, now we are relaxing
(removing this constraint)
this but having issues when migrating.
The above is represented in postgress as a UNIQUE constraint
and in all models.py the above constraint is as-above — but in pg it is
represented as
(i) UNIQUE (event_id, number)
and sometimes as...
(ii) UNIQUE (number, event_id)
…and now when doing migration - for all tables where it is represented as
(i) everything
goes well, but in tables where (ii) the following error:
File "/Users/XXX/.virtualenvs/ssi195_2711/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/django/db/migrations/migration.py", line 123, in apply
operation.database_forwards(self.app_label, schema_editor, old_state,
project_state)
File "/Users/XXX/.virtualenvs/ssi195_2711/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/django/db/migrations/operations/models.py", line 359, in
database_forwards
getattr(new_model._meta, self.option_name, set()),
File "/Users/XXX/.virtualenvs/ssi195_2711/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/django/db/backends/base/schema.py", line 318, in
alter_unique_together
self._delete_composed_index(model, fields, {'unique': True},
self.sql_delete_unique)
File "/Users/XXX/.virtualenvs/ssi195_2711/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/django/db/backends/base/schema.py", line 347, in
_delete_composed_index
", ".join(columns),
ValueError: Found wrong number (0) of constraints for
match_ppc_ppccompetitor(event_id, number)
So seems to need to do some migrations manually and no biggie - but yet
strange and unsure if Django or pg issue….
/ Jens
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26535>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
* needs_better_patch: => 0
* needs_tests: => 0
* needs_docs: => 0
Old description:
New description:
——
(i) UNIQUE (event_id, number)
and sometimes as...
(ii) UNIQUE (number, event_id)
/ Jens
--
Comment:
Could you provide a sample project that reproduces the issue?
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26535#comment:1>
Comment (by jenlu):
Hi, did some test but unable to reproduce in my ‘current’ setup - it
always generates a
uniqueness constraint that can be removed.
Seems like my oldest models did generate one ordering in pg
(UNIQUE(number, event_id)
whereas models added later on did generate the different ordering in pq
(UNIQUE(event_id,
number) and this later have no problems to be removed/relaxed.
Workaround for me was just to DROP the constraint and add a new one with
same arguments
but in different order..
/ Jens
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26535#comment:2>
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => worksforme
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26535#comment:3>