REST itself is an architectural pattern.
Trying to figure out sematics to map MVC to any client-server
technology will eventually fail since MVC is designed to work with
desktop GUI applications - mainly to separate UI part from the other
logic.
And even if you could figure out something it's better not to try to
reinvent terminology - Django itself has concept of a view already
which is not equal to MVC view part.
Same appliest to DRF - it has rather solid architecture that doesn't
fit any other than REST terminology. So what ever you try to figure out
it's best to describe components as they are, models are models,
serializers are serializers and so on. Also note that you may have
models that are in database but how about models that are not?
Trying to hammer all that to something else will eventually just cause
a confusion with terms.
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Alex G Rothberg <
agrot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What (if any) is the best architectural pattern to describe DRF? Is
> it MVC, MVVM <
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_View_ViewModel>, or
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Django REST framework" group. To unsubscribe from this group
> and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
>
django-rest-fram...@googlegroups.com. For more options,
> visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.