Haystack Developers

> On 03 Feb 2015, at 14:05, Jannis Leidel <lei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 03

Chris, I think this looks good to me. Nothing stands out as obviously wrong & if the tests are

One other note: we have a lot of test code which can be simplified now that we aren't supporting

I created a milestone to track things which we should release soon: https://github.com/toastdriven/

Many thanks to Chris for helping review and test the code a bit, for your consideration, a PR: https:

Currently if you run pep8, flake8, etc. over the codebase you'll get a number of warnings for

This seems like an interesting idea — I've definitely felt the same way a few times. After a

Okay, we should make a decision about this. There's an argument that for Solr passing "

If you're actively working on those ES tickets, delaying seems quite reasonable - it'd be

Sorry, I dropped the ball here. I'm in favor of Jannis' suggestion. Mostly, I just don't

Following up on this. I merge his branch locally & ran the ES tests under both Python 2.X &

Justin, Sounds good. Since you said you would take it on, I have unassigned me and assigned it to you

Hello all, I merged my solr4 branch into master, which has the following implications: 1. I updated

Dan, I'm working on it. I have most of Haystack ported to Py3 & will just work in the needed

I have no objections; I think it's a good plan. +1 Ben On Saturday, May 4, 2013 1:35:22 PM UTC-5,