While that's not a fact, it's certainly a conclusion that could be
drawn by those numbers. Also, keep in mind that those revision numbers
include ALL commits that took place to the SVN repository that hosts
Django, including all the main branches and djangoproject.com. As an
example of why this is an important distinction, some basic research
on my end shows that of the over 7000 commits that have taken place,
well under 5000 of them were to Django trunk. I don't know how many of
them were post-0.96, but I expect it's well less than the 2297 the raw
numbers would suggest.
All in all, I agree that trunk should be promoted more heavily, but I
don't think revision numbers are the way to do it.
-Gul