You can eat them; there's very little that'll degrade them due to the
bizarre fusion of nucleotide and amine backbone. And because they have
little charge, they should penetrate the cell/nuclear membrane pretty
easily.
Come to think of it, if you want to jump a few experimental levels for a
crude crude study, a vial of PNA and some nematodes would be a really
cheap experiment to try in the longevity arena.
On 19/10/11 10:11, CoryG wrote:
I doubt they'd count as a GM food under even a loose interpretation, but
they'd definitely count as unregulated/licensed drugs if you took them
outside the lab?
Also, eating telomerase should be totally safe; as a protein/RNA hybrid,
it just gets digested, right? Any evidence that it survives gut transit?
If not, eating *anything* would probably be toxic, because species
differ in their telomere consensus, and if something capped your
telomeres with the wrong sequence, your native telomerase won't be able
to extend them any further.
While I'm at it, here's an idea I had a few years ago, never gonna use
personally, go nuts.
==Begin Prior Art==
Peptide nucleic acids fused to a FokI domain would make a great and
probably easier to use alternative to Zinc-finger Nucleases for gene
targeting/excision/repair. They won't be orally available without
PEGylation or something though; the FokI domain will get peptidase'd in
the stomach.
Two separate PNAs targeting 8-15bp each with FokI domains could target
almost any area of the genome for homologous recombination based repair.
You could use it to cut out HIV genomes in infected cells, to remove one
copy of a defective gene in dominant (Long QT 2) or incompletely
dominant (Sickle-Cell Anaemia) conditions by other-copy-mediated repair,
or to insert DNA of your choice.
As far as I know, there's no patent minefield yet in the PNA-protein
fusion area, so it could be what Zinc-Fingers were supposed to be, and
might be in ~15 years. Until then, there's always TALENs as a
locally-transcribed alternative for all the above, if you don't want
something edible.
==End Prior Art==
Indeed, based on the somewhat extensive research I had to do a few years
back for Cancer Research project, much of the cancer recurrence you see
years after "cure" is actually the re-evolution of cancer from
precancerous cells that escaped the primary tumour really early but hit
the hayflick limit elsewhere in the body or were otherwise contained.
Helping them to temporarily bypass the hayflick limit during
chemotherapy or similar would render them susceptible to treatment.
This being part of a broader hypothesis of mine that "baiting" cancer
will become part of routine therapy within a decade. Also lends credence
to the original hypothesis of homeotherapy* that a little of what causes
something can help treat it: Totally transient "carcinogens" might help
flush out precancerous cells.
-Cathal
*The *real* original Homeotherapy, not this dilution-to-oblivion
bullshit. Homeo = same; Homeotherapy started out AFAIK with the idea
that if you want to treat something minor, you give a little of
something that causes a more severe reaction at full dose- the body
responds to the treatment by "pushing back" and curing the original
minor condition.
--
www.indiebiotech.com
twitter.com/onetruecathal
joindiaspora.com/u/cathalgarvey
PGP Public Key: http://bit.ly/CathalGKey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.