microsphere-based nanoscopy

57 views
Skip to first unread message

Mackenzie Cowell

unread,
Mar 4, 2011, 4:45:32 PM3/4/11
to diybio
This is an amazing and DIY-friendly sounding technique to image features smaller than diffraction limit of visible light: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/03/microsphere-nanoscope/.

Apparently it's hard to reproduce.  I want to try it.  I have access to a basic optical microscope.  Anyone else interested in trying to (dis)prove the technique?


Cheers
Mac

--
+1.231.313.9062 / m...@diybio.org / @100ideas
nano-microsphere-microscope-sem-2-nature.jpg

Dakota Hamill

unread,
Mar 4, 2011, 5:12:08 PM3/4/11
to diy...@googlegroups.com
That's awesome.  I wonder if you could get little micro-spheres of another material and use those with an SEM to increase an SEM max resolution, just like these increased an optical microscopes max resolution...just blew my own mind. 

 Even though I just realized that wouldn't work with electrons.  Oh well it was a good idea for 10 seconds.

That'd be neat to try out.  It looks like they made their own silica micro-spheres.  On a side note, my senior research is on building those silica micro-spheres, only I am trying to get a ferrite core in the middle of mine so they are magnetically susceptible.

Not trying to steal the limelight, but here is a video from the lab who's paper I am trying to reproduce.  Magnetochromatic microspheres.  It's neat!!!


Anyway, If I ever actually get GOOD at making consistently sized micro-sphere's I'll bring them into sprout.  My chemicals just came in this week actually, I need to get working on trying to make some.  They were using 2-9 micrometer spheres, and the papers I've been reading they become Bragg Reflectors at 70-150 or so is optimal size.  perhaps the ferrite core makes up a larger portion of that...who knows.  Won't know until we try.  

-Dakota





Nathan McCorkle

unread,
Mar 4, 2011, 10:17:45 PM3/4/11
to diy...@googlegroups.com, Mackenzie Cowell
I've used these guys for spheres before, they have good customer service too:
http://www.bangslabs.com/products/uniform_silica_microspheres

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "DIYbio" group.
> To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
>

--
Nathan McCorkle
Rochester Institute of Technology
College of Science, Biotechnology/Bioinformatics

Nathan McCorkle

unread,
Mar 4, 2011, 10:19:09 PM3/4/11
to diy...@googlegroups.com, Mackenzie Cowell
I just saw that bangslabs is where paper you listed got their spheres.

Dakota Hamill

unread,
Mar 4, 2011, 10:55:46 PM3/4/11
to diy...@googlegroups.com
My bad I thought they made them themselves.  My Ctr+F keywords didn't pick up their buyer.  $100+ per 0.5g of tiny round balls of sand, who would have thunk it.

Nathan what did you use your spheres for?  Are you a student at RIT or employee?  I wonder if you know two of my friends, one goes there, one left to xfer to Northeastern.

Nathan McCorkle

unread,
Mar 5, 2011, 12:13:05 AM3/5/11
to diy...@googlegroups.com
I am writing particle tracking software to operate on these particles
in a fluid flow... bangs sells beads with coupling kits so you can
hook up carbs protein and nucleic acids... I have only used their PS
fluoro beads tho.

Simon Quellen Field

unread,
Mar 5, 2011, 12:32:45 AM3/5/11
to diybio
You'll want SiO2 spheres in the 3 to 10 micrometer range,
and a transparent test subject.

In the article, they get their microshperes from Bangs Laboratories:

They made their own test objects, but you can get diffraction gratings from
Edmund Scientific, or play with butterfly wings or something else with fine
detail. Perhaps a Blu-Ray DVD with the metal etched off.

I have found that I get better results if I grind off nearly half the sphere:
The flat side goes towards the subject, and collects more light, thus increasing
the numerical aperture.

Of course, my lenses are a little bigger than 4.74 microns, but it seems to me you
could get the same result using tiny drops of mineral oil, perhaps by using a human
hair as a drop former (dip the hair in oil, touch it to the surface, look through
the scope at it). Much easier than spheres, and you get to place them where you
wish, instead of relying on them to "self-assemble" in the right place.

-----
Get a free science project every week! "http://scitoys.com/newsletter.html"




--

Nathan McCorkle

unread,
Mar 5, 2011, 12:41:14 AM3/5/11
to diy...@googlegroups.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages