--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
* what graphical concepts should comprise the diybio logo?
--
I too believe this isn't about translating the tools DIYbio uses into
symbols but about creating a truly DIYbio visual language. I think
this is also an opportunity to make use of the computing/programming
skills in the community: logo's that evolve, different logo's for
different sub-groups based on the same algorithms / protocols, ... ?
On Dec 12, 7:13 pm, Tito Jankowski <titojankow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree wholeheartedly with Jason. Symbols are difficult - I would
> like to see logos that capture the 'spirit' of DIYbio rather than the
> 'science' (so maybe a 'community lab', or 'safety' logo, but pipettes
> etc are overboard)
>
> Tito
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 12, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Jason Bobe <jasonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > * what graphical concepts should comprise the diybio logo?
>
> > I think one critical requirement for the logo is that the # of
> > colors be limited to 2 or less and otherwise designed in such a way
> > that the logo can be easily (and cheaply) used for various marketing
> > collateral, e.g. stickers, t-shirts, and other printed goods. My
> > personal preference is for logos that are simple and not over-
> > designed. Our logo should probably continue to be a logotype/