On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:59 AM, David Reeves <
drre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Patrik,
>
> I had that very same idea independently a few weeks ago, agree it would be
> fantastic, and have been working on researching alternatives, as I'm also
> interested in 3D printing and trained in molecular biology. I have tried
> some initial experiments with commercially available enzymes (e.g.
> proteinase K from the above-mentioned Tritirachium) and some biological
> detergent mixtures (see the interesting comment in the linked thread about
> dishwasher tablets!), but haven't seen significant degradation of 3 mm
> filament yet over several days. The problem with these enzymes is that while
> they do degrade plastic, it is usually measured over the course of weeks or
> months - the specific activity is usually really low. My guess is some
> serious mutagenesis work will be necessary to get the rate up to where it
> would be useful.
But then, for a lot of people, plastic's resistance to degradation is
what makes it high-value. Lignocellulolytic organisms haven't evolved
to devour a tree in a day because if they did that A) they wouldn't be
able to eat the tree all by themselves so quickly, encouraging other
organisms to thrive and B) they would liquify all the biomass so
quickly they extinguish their food supply quite quickly... unless they
had super-refined control of the enzyme synthesis or fast enzyme
response time otherwise.
In that respect, finding a better solvent or non-self-propagating
method seems more attainable than massive mutatgenesis or Genetic
Modification.