TAPCIS was not a CompuServe product. It was published and distributed by Support Group, Inc. of McHenry, Maryland. This is confirmed in preserved TAPCIS documentation, which explicitly lists Support Group, Inc. as the publisher and distributor:
https://www.nfbnet.org/ftp/pc/offline/tapcis/tapcis.txt
The U.S. trademark registration for TAPCIS also identifies Support Group, Inc. as the owner and applicant:
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=74000392&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch
Additional historical context and file-format information appear in the TAPCIS entry on Filext, which likewise attributes the software to Support Group, Inc.:
https://filext.com/file-extension/TAP
A preserved distribution package (TAPCIS 5.42) is available on the Internet Archive, and its internal documentation also credits Support Group, Inc.:
https://archive.org/details/tapcis542
Judy
On 2026-03-30 15:35:41, Judy Madnick <jmad...@gmail.com> wrote:
This is what Copilot said and it offered this: "If you need a tighter version, a version tailored for a Wikipedia talk‑page correction, or something that lays out the evidence in a more argumentative way, just say the word — I can shape it however you need."TAPCIS was not a CompuServe product. It was published and distributed by Support Group, Inc. of McHenry, Maryland. This is confirmed in preserved TAPCIS documentation, which explicitly lists Support Group, Inc. as the publisher and distributor:
https://www.nfbnet.org/ftp/pc/offline/tapcis/tapcis.txt
The U.S. trademark registration for TAPCIS also identifies Support Group, Inc. as the owner and applicant: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=74000392&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch
Additional historical context and file-format information appear in the TAPCIS entry on Filext, which likewise attributes the software to Support Group, Inc.:
https://filext.com/file-extension/TAP
A preserved distribution package (TAPCIS 5.42) is available on the Internet Archive, and its internal documentation also credits Support Group, Inc.:https://archive.org/details/tapcis542
On 2026-03-30 17:21:47, Judy Madnick <jmad...@gmail.com> wrote:
I hope you received my follow-up message regarding bad links but I'm glad you were able to find what you needed.Judy
This was the message:
Howard Benner was the creator of Tapcis.In my early days of online computing, the only thing available, outside of university or government networks, was CompuServe. That is what served businesses and ordinary citizens, like me.I wandered in as an inexperienced, idle user looking for news, amisuement, and whatever else I could find. Much of what was available on CServe, at that time, was organized into Forums. Users could create their own topical forums and submit them approval to CompuServe.LitForum was one of the first that I joined. It seemed to be populated by people who had a deep interest in writing. Technical writing, news writing, but mostly fiction and humor.In one section of the LitForum, Diana Gabaldon was posting chapters of a novel she was working on. It ended up becoming Outlander.There was also a word game going on where the ‘dealer’ would offer up an obscure word and other players would submit fake definitions to him/her via private email. You all know what happened in the game, after thatI started watching it somewhere in the first ten rounds, or so. Intrigued, I posted a note to all saying that they seemed to be playing a word game and asking for some explanation. Bunches of people helped explain the game they called Fictionary, and invited me to join in. I did, and rolled along for a few rounds, not being very successful but having fun, and learning.CompuServe was expensive, back in those days. You paid by the minute, like on a taxi ride. As my number of forums grew, it got to be pretty steep. One day, I posted a note on LiForum, that I thought I was going to have to give it up.A couple of people told me to go find the TapCis Forum, which offered a program that would enable you to do all of your reading and writing offline. You marked the forums, or sections thereof, that you wanted to visit, signed on, and watched Tapcis go into each, download all the updates you requested and upload any new posts you had to offer. Then it would go offline and let you work through things at your leisure, with no meter ticking.As I discovered quite quickly, there was, on the TapCis Forum, a sizable group of people operating way over my head. Neil Rubenking, who was an editor of PC Magazine. Several engineering and computer academics (Theresa Carey, et al) in the programs that had developed the original internet.They had collected around Howard Benner, a brilliant, and hilarious, guy who had helped develop CompuServe and other parts of the burgeoning online world.With TapCis, my CServe usage ballooned, and my costs dropped to nearly nothing.After playing several rounds, I finally scored a win on round 27. Which meant of course, that I became the dealer for Round 28. It was awful. Infamously awful.Missed defs, computer delays, an awful word (Chamfer) which, it turned out, quite a few people already knew. By the time that became obvious, we were two or three days into it, so we plugged on.Round 28 was, and still is, I’m sure, universally acknowledged as the most flawed round ever dealt. Many of the rules of the game grew out of that tragedy.Shortly thereafter, Howard Benner addressed the group, as a whole, saying that the publishers of the game Fictionary had served him with a cease and desist order for violating their trademark.Howard said that we either had to stop playing the game online, or find another name for what we were doing. He offered up a new name, “in honor of the worst round ever dealt…” Dixonary.TapCis and CompuServe, of course, both got replaced by faster cheaper, more comprehensive versions of online communication. But our version of the creative word game lives on as the acknowledged longest surviving online game.Steve Dixon
“Wherever you are is the entry point” ~Kabir Das
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/Mailbird-c8daddd4-236f-4663-983c-883ff812b00a%40boargules.com.
--
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CAFkjdZMVHUNruYM2fn2EGQgYShi%3DHUY7GUJn54OhhGmPq3fqbA%40mail.gmail.com.
Quote:
Judy and I date back to CompuServe, too. Before joining here we were both Sysops on the Working From Home forum; I think it was Dodi who suggested we should try Dixonary.
I joined Compuserve around 1994, delighted and amazed to have my own 9,600 baud dial-up connection. I joined a few forums, including Sailing and UK, but didn't discover Tapcis at first. In those days, Compuserve forums flashed up a message whenver people signed in to or left the forum. I was spending 10 or 15 minutes, or even longer, reading messages in each forum (paying my phone company by the minute for the privilege), and couldn't understand how people could sign into a forum and then leave again seconds later. Then I discovered Tapcis and all was revealed! I founf this odd section in the Tapcis forum called 'The Parlor' which was full of these strange messages headed with Round numbers (around 580 at eh time,IIRC). I joined the game (one round after Dodi, I think) and have never looked back. By that time, of course, Tapcis and Dixonary were well established, so while names like Howard Benner and Neil Rubenking are familiar to me, I never interacted with them.-- Tim L
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/dcdb16a8-0865-4065-8dce-419691b61e95n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/0E2F60EF031F0F361A37002004%40JudyMadnick2023.