Unusual pattern of condensate pipe corrosion

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Len-IDEA

unread,
May 11, 2016, 6:01:28 PM5/11/16
to Distribution Forum

Posted on behalf of Bob Smith, RMF Engineering, bob....@rmf.com; 800-938-5760:

A district energy provider has experienced an unusual pattern of degradation in its direct buried condensate system. The pipe was installed with a nonmetallic outer jacket with insulation adjacent to a companion steam pipe. The steam system operates at 100 psi. The outer jacket of the steam and condensate pipe has been damaged and both pipes have subsequently been exposed to groundwater.

 

While this is not uncommon, the condensate pipe has completely rusted through on the top half of the pipe from the outside in. The bottom half is still in good condition and the inner surface of the pipe is still in good condition. See attached pictures. The pipes were installed in the mid 90’s. Has anyone else seen this type of failure and determined a cause?

 

20160318_101939.jpg
20160318_101954.jpg

Rundle, Gordon

unread,
May 12, 2016, 10:38:37 AM5/12/16
to Len-IDEA, Distribution Forum

Where was the condensate  pipe in relation to the steam pipe? (i.e. 12 , 3 or , 6 o’clock?)

 

 

Gordon Rundle

Engineering Project Manager

ct graphic

366 Kentucky Ave, Indianapolis IN 46225

Office / Fax 317.693.8854

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Distribution Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to distribution-fo...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to distribut...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/distribution-forum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

David Christiansen

unread,
May 12, 2016, 10:38:37 AM5/12/16
to Len-IDEA, Distribution Forum
This is not uncommon failure at Univ of Minn direct bury - the condensate is the weakpoint of the direct bury system.  We haven't investigated why the corrosion occurs in teh specific location that it does.  Corrosion has a lot of factors that play into why it occurs in some places and not in others (chemical composition of the groundwater/soil, temperature of the piping at the corrosion site, electrical potential at the corrosion site, etc.).  For good or bad, we are in reactive mode when a direct bury pipe starts to leak, as such, focused on replacement and installation to achieve the longest life possible.

Our current focus is looking to develop a process to effectively determine remaining life of direct bury piping without accessing the physical pipe in the ground.  We want to be able to identify the budget year when we anticipate the need to replace the piping.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Distribution Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to distribution-fo...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to distribut...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/distribution-forum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Comments and Feedback are Always Appreciated.
 
David Christiansen
Principal Mechanical Engineer Supervisor
Energy Management
 - a division of Facilities Management
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Office:  612-626-3766
Cell:  952-607-5596

SMRP Certified Maintenance and Reliability Professional

Ontiveros, Juan M

unread,
May 12, 2016, 10:38:37 AM5/12/16
to Len-IDEA, Distribution Forum

Bob

 

I suggest sending this to a metallurgist for analysis. If the corrosion is from the outside then the insulation barrier probably failed and allowed whatever soil condition along with the ground water to corrode the exterior of the pipe.

 

There are many variables:

 

How good is the deaerator. Is it allowing oxygen to ride on top of the pipe which caused a pin hole on top which then destroyed the insulation which then let the ground water in?

 

Was the pipe installed correctly with backfill that did not destroy the insulation?

 

If the pipes are not installed properly the pipe movement could have damaged the insulation.

 

I have now exceeded what I know about this.

 

Juan

 

From: distribut...@googlegroups.com [mailto:distribut...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Len-IDEA
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Distribution Forum <distribut...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: {Distribution Forum} Unusual pattern of condensate pipe corrosion

 

Posted on behalf of Bob Smith, RMF Engineering, bob....@rmf.com; 800-938-5760:

A district energy provider has experienced an unusual pattern of degradation in its direct buried condensate system. The pipe was installed with a nonmetallic outer jacket with insulation adjacent to a companion steam pipe. The steam system operates at 100 psi. The outer jacket of the steam and condensate pipe has been damaged and both pipes have subsequently been exposed to groundwater.

 

While this is not uncommon, the condensate pipe has completely rusted through on the top half of the pipe from the outside in. The bottom half is still in good condition and the inner surface of the pipe is still in good condition. See attached pictures. The pipes were installed in the mid 90’s. Has anyone else seen this type of failure and determined a cause?

 

--

Hugh Bahar

unread,
May 12, 2016, 10:38:37 AM5/12/16
to Len-IDEA, Distribution Forum

Never seen that before. 

 

Hypothesis:

 

Check this out RE vapor phase corrosion-scroll down to the second page:  http://www.woodgroup.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/news-tech-articles/2011-06_Cond-Corrosion-Modeling-ISOPE_WGIM.pdf

 

If the above happened and provided the mechanism for perforation, the hole would tend to be in the top half of the condensate return pipe.   Saturated vapor would emit from the perforation and subsequently condense inside the non-metallic jacket.  The leaking vapor would tend to collect in the top half of the jacket and condense, accelerating top-of-pipe corrosion as condensate pH is about 5.5 if not treated with an amine.  Once the jacket was degraded from increasing vapor loss as corrosion progressed, ground water was introduced, accelerating corrosion.

 

Once the vapor began finding its way out of the jacket, it degraded the adjacent steam line jacket until it perforated as well, subsequently exposing the steam line to steam, condensate and ground water.

 

Just a hypothesis…until a more informed answer is provided.

 

Hugh

 

From: distribut...@googlegroups.com [mailto:distribut...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Len-IDEA
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 6:01 PM
To: Distribution Forum
Subject: {Distribution Forum} Unusual pattern of condensate pipe corrosion

 

Posted on behalf of Bob Smith, RMF Engineering, bob....@rmf.com; 800-938-5760:

A district energy provider has experienced an unusual pattern of degradation in its direct buried condensate system. The pipe was installed with a nonmetallic outer jacket with insulation adjacent to a companion steam pipe. The steam system operates at 100 psi. The outer jacket of the steam and condensate pipe has been damaged and both pipes have subsequently been exposed to groundwater.

 

While this is not uncommon, the condensate pipe has completely rusted through on the top half of the pipe from the outside in. The bottom half is still in good condition and the inner surface of the pipe is still in good condition. See attached pictures. The pipes were installed in the mid 90’s. Has anyone else seen this type of failure and determined a cause?

 

--

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages