Dear Distance Sampling Group,
I am currently using the dsm package to estimate the abundance of narwhals from aerial photographs, treating each photo as a segment in the dsm analysis. The photos overlap by approximately 30% with adjacent images, which results in some narwhal detections being duplicated across segments.
I would appreciate clarification on whether this overlap needs to be explicitly corrected for in the analysis, or if it is adequately accounted for by specifying segment.area in the model formula.
Thank you for your time,
Marianne
Hi Tiago,
Thanks for the quick reply! This is very helpful.
In previous analyses, I cropped the photos to eliminate overlap and only used detections from the non-overlapping areas to avoid counting duplicates. I was hoping to simplify the data pre-processing this time by skipping that step, but as you suggested, it’s best to remove duplicates and use properly segmented data for the analysis.
This brings me to a second question: for some of the strata, I’m planning to use a strip transect approach. My plan was to calculate narwhal density across all photos in the transect—including the overlapping areas—and then multiply that density by the total area covered by the transect to get the total number of narwhals detected on each transect. Assuming the photos are read independently (i.e., the probability of detecting a narwhal in one photo doesn’t affect the probability of detecting narwhals in adjacent/overlapping photos), do you see any issues with this approach?
Thanks again for your help,