Mei-Ling
The application of distance sampling methodology to fixed point of migrating birds seems dubious. As you note if the observer if stationary (on an anchored boat or platform?) then all birds are moving faster than the observer and animal movement will inflate the estimates of density or abundance.
It is beyond my intelligence, but I wonder
if the sampling design you describe might (with sufficient
replicate stations) be akin to a camera trap type of distance
sampling analysis. The difference between a camera and a human
observer is that animals (largely) become habituated to cameras,
whereas there is unlikely to be habituation to observers on an
anchored platform. As a result, the distribution of birds at
distances from the platform is probably deformed from its
assumed 45degree distribution. Guess that thinking in print
didn't really lead to useful insights.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "distance-sampling" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to distance-sampl...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/distance-sampling/1f7cde10-96fc-4278-8546-822fe5ff6975n%40googlegroups.com.
-- Eric Rexstad Centre for Ecological and Environmental Modelling University of St Andrews St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland SC013532