Thanks for your question and welcome to the email group. Before I work through an analysis, I want to make sure I understand the design of the survey that generated the data. The design might not fully be described by the detections. This is particularly challenging
if there are transects on which no nests are detected. That is why I ask.
There are four transects (TA14, TA34, TA38, TA49) each 1km in length and 36 detections. Is that correct? I also note 2/3 of the 36 detections are made on transect TA49; that will make uncertainty in your estimates quite large because of the variability in encounter
rates between transects.
Your screenshot also shows estimates of nest production and nest disappearance times to use as multipliers, converting density of nests into density of chimpanzees. However, you also have the multiplier estimates appearing not only in the proper column, but
also in the standard error and degrees of freedom columns. Those later two columns are for providing the uncertainty in those multipliers. Please describe how those multipliers were derived and what uncertainty is associated with them.
I also direct your attention to online training material we have regarding the use of multipliers in distance sampling analysis. Watch the videos and perhaps work through the exercise provided here