> Just to set the record straight here, no, we don't have any explicit
> double-talk detection. It's handled implicitly by limiting the
> magnitude of the error used in adaptation.
>
> Additionally, we disregard the filter output if its energy is higher
> than the input, since this indicates the filter has likely diverged.
Yes, please set the record straight because the answers I am getting
here
doesn't match up with the code.
How did you arrive at the 48ms/96ms tail-length for the AEC? The
number of taps
is 65 for the Wiener filter as far as I can tell...
That translates into 65/8 milliseconds = 8ms
Or should I be looking at something else?