Dear Dirac experts (and non-experts):
I'm attempting to use the atomic start routines to get a good initial guess for a difficult diatomic. Unfortunately all the examples I've found either involve 1st row atoms where the open-shell occupations involve all the orbitals in ungerade symmetry or a fully closed-shell atom. I can't figure out how one would use this even for something like sulfur. I would like to have multiple orbital strings with their occupations, e.g., one string for closed shell orbitals and another for open shells, but this doesn't seem to work. Can someone post an example?
regards,
-Kirk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "dirac-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dirac-users...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/F7568000-6069-4FEE-B3AB-6C0D133D9488%40wsu.edu.
Hi Andre,
ah, from the manual (and its examples), I took the trailing "2" after the character string to mean inversion symmetry such that the two sets of strings corresponded to one for gerade and one for ungerade.
thanks!
regards, -Kirk
From: <dirac...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Andre Gomes <asp...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "dirac...@googlegroups.com" <dirac...@googlegroups.com>
Date: Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 7:39 AM
To: "dirac...@googlegroups.com" <dirac...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [dirac-users] atomic start
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/CADF8p%3D-ZBac8DV5u2TdvrHcx0yZBCEyPBqyHFtcHjLYYMwWJWQ%40mail.gmail.com.
thanks again Andre, this works as expected now. A follow-up question though. Is it typical for the energy to rise by nearly 100 Hartrees in iteration 2 before it starts moving down again? It makes me suspect that the benefits of using the atomic start is completely spoiled at that point.
regards, -Kirk
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/F1EA22BE-66CC-42C1-A4F9-CB98E10381E6%40wsu.edu.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/000B82F4-60A1-48F7-ADF3-D12F5668FDF9%40wsu.edu.
Hi Andre,
in my case it converges without it but the resulting spinor occupation is not what I would have expected, so I wanted to try atomic start just to make sure it was converging to the lowest energy solution.
best,
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/CADF8p%3D-d0ii5Qd0apP29bFLZhsw8bLbj%2BOi6EtWXvXEdTmPj4Q%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/7F02B231-30B7-410E-BE37-212116F3942D%40wsu.edu.
Dear Ayaki,
thanks, I might try that next (I had forgotten I could do that). It's mostly the character of the spinors I'm worried about, but maybe setting Omega will help too.
best regards,
-Kirk
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/CAHv9aY6DdB%3DibBiS2q%3DB7OyNaikKJUTK%3DS0bh%2B2gtjAGXD3HOg%40mail.gmail.com.
Is it not possible to have 5 values of .MJSELE? Four values work just fine.
Specifically I get a crash for:
.OPEN SHELL
1
4/8
.MJSELEC
5
1 3 5 7 9
72 38 16 4 0
2 2 2 0 2
output:
* Vector selection based on m_j symmetry
- inactive shell:
72 38 16 4
- active shell(s):
2 2 2 0
INPUT ERROR! This shell should have 4 orbitals!
Perhaps I've misinterpreted how the input for this works? I was using .KPSELEC as a template.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/76C83631-C43E-4333-8C02-7040B2E4CEBA%40wsu.edu.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/73CF8273-BFB1-4E6B-BC87-79FB0DB7C289%40wsu.edu.
Thank you Ayaki.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/CAHv9aY7C%3DoZKxudPxoMma72A-AmoeaAXO46YMfhaFtYvmrQ6%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/7613B67F-4C04-4BF4-A053-C47B30098782%40wsu.edu.
fantastic, thank you!
best,
-Kirk
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dirac-users/CAHv9aY7_bM5yTPS%3D3vxohE0zoi5eOVmruyvLn89Oovu89KGsyA%40mail.gmail.com.