Abelisaurid tooth mark on abelisaurid tooth from Upper Cretaceous of France (free pdf)
121 views
Skip to first unread message
Ben Creisler
Mar 26, 2026, 11:16:56 AM (8 days ago) Mar 26
to DinosaurMa...@googlegroups.com
Ben Creisler
A new paper:
Free pdf:
Damien BOSCHETTO, Bruno MAGGIA, Léa DE BRITO, Julie BORGESE, Didier CLAVEL, Jean-Pierre CHENET, Thomas ROQUES, Stéphane SÈBE, Jean-Marc VEYSSIÈRES & Jean GOEDERT (2026)
Unusual Abelisauridae tooth mark on an Abelisauridae tooth from the Upper Cretaceous of Cruzy (Hérault, France): implications for feeding behaviours.
Geodiversitas 48(5): 69-85.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5252/geodiversitas2026v48a5.
https://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/en/periodiques/geodiversitas/48/5
Free pdf:
https://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/sites/default/files/articles/hd/geodiversitas2026v48a5-pdfa.pdf
Bite marks in the fossil record provide information on trophic, behavioural and taphonomic interactions. Here we describe a bevelled bite mark with parallel striations on a denticulate tooth tentatively assigned to Abelisauridae indet. from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian-Maastrichtian) deposit of Massecaps (municipality of Cruzy, Hérault), in southern France. Comparison of the bite mark with the different morphologies of serrated teeth found on the same deposit enables us to attribute it to the tooth morphotype that we tentatively refer to Abelisauridae indet. Although rarely described in the literature, similar confamilial bite marks have already been observed on Tyrannosauridae Osborn, 1906 teeth. The position and orientation of the bite mark rule out the possibility that it was made by one individual on another, during agonistic behaviour such as head-biting. The relatively large number (n = 44) of rootless teeth attributed to Abelisauridae indet. found at Massecaps locality, the scarcity of other Abelisauridae Bonaparte & Novas, 1985 skeletal remains, and the presence of non-theropod dinosaur skeletal remains marked by serrated teeth strongly suggest that these teeth were lost during the consumption of a carcasses and that tooth M5246 was marked on that occasion. The description of this previously undocumented mark among Abelisauridae expands our knowledge of large theropods feeding behaviour from the Campanian-Maastrichtian period.
Damien BOSCHETTO, Bruno MAGGIA, Léa DE BRITO, Julie BORGESE, Didier CLAVEL, Jean-Pierre CHENET, Thomas ROQUES, Stéphane SÈBE, Jean-Marc VEYSSIÈRES & Jean GOEDERT (2026)
Unusual Abelisauridae tooth mark on an Abelisauridae tooth from the Upper Cretaceous of Cruzy (Hérault, France): implications for feeding behaviours.
Geodiversitas 48(5): 69-85.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5252/geodiversitas2026v48a5.
https://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/en/periodiques/geodiversitas/48/5
Free pdf:
https://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/sites/default/files/articles/hd/geodiversitas2026v48a5-pdfa.pdf
Bite marks in the fossil record provide information on trophic, behavioural and taphonomic interactions. Here we describe a bevelled bite mark with parallel striations on a denticulate tooth tentatively assigned to Abelisauridae indet. from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian-Maastrichtian) deposit of Massecaps (municipality of Cruzy, Hérault), in southern France. Comparison of the bite mark with the different morphologies of serrated teeth found on the same deposit enables us to attribute it to the tooth morphotype that we tentatively refer to Abelisauridae indet. Although rarely described in the literature, similar confamilial bite marks have already been observed on Tyrannosauridae Osborn, 1906 teeth. The position and orientation of the bite mark rule out the possibility that it was made by one individual on another, during agonistic behaviour such as head-biting. The relatively large number (n = 44) of rootless teeth attributed to Abelisauridae indet. found at Massecaps locality, the scarcity of other Abelisauridae Bonaparte & Novas, 1985 skeletal remains, and the presence of non-theropod dinosaur skeletal remains marked by serrated teeth strongly suggest that these teeth were lost during the consumption of a carcasses and that tooth M5246 was marked on that occasion. The description of this previously undocumented mark among Abelisauridae expands our knowledge of large theropods feeding behaviour from the Campanian-Maastrichtian period.
Mickey Mortimer
Mar 27, 2026, 4:25:32 AM (8 days ago) Mar 27
to Dinosaur Mailing Group
"The position and orientation of the bite mark rule out the possibility
that it was made by one individual on another, during agonistic
behaviour such as head-biting." Then the accompanying cover illustration and Figure 7 labeled "Reconstruction of the potential scene that led to the tooth mark" shows exactly that!
Mickey Mortimer
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages