You Have 1 New Google Doc Message

166 views
Skip to first unread message

Gerhard Kmet

unread,
Jun 18, 2013, 9:50:30 AM6/18/13
to

https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRch5X9-KDdWzW_WZw76xp0yj6jZTzniUyL9d0wjhz01mApiXNuki0s10Y 
Google Drive
. Keep everything. Share anything

Please view the document i uploaded for you using Google docs. CLICK HERE just sign in with your email to view the document its very important.

Thank You.

Gerhard

lutherp40

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 2:20:22 PM6/19/13
to digita...@googlegroups.com
me thinks that this a fishing attempt. :(

jdow

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 4:53:49 PM6/19/13
to digita...@googlegroups.com
Please don't repeat the addresses in his mail in comments or forwarded
email. Mung them as I did below. Practicing "safe email" is as important
as practicing safe sex.

It was obvious. Look at the disparity between the addresses given. I
hope nobody clicked on it. It's as likely to be a malware trap as a
spam site. I seem to remember the original had "too many recipients"
to be anything but spam, too.

Furthermore, the subject is rather inappropriate for this group. So I
never opened the email except to view raw headers with no decoding.
Such mails often have HTML bodies. Opening such invites in malware.

{^_^} Joanne/W6MKU

On 2013/06/19 11:20, lutherp40 wrote:
> me thinks that this a fishing attempt. :(
>
> On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:50:30 AM UTC-4, Gerhard Kmet wrote:
>
> *https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/images?...
>
> Google Drive*. Keep everything. Share anything
>
> Please view the document i uploaded for you using Google docs. *CLICK HERE
> ...http://livenlo.ru/wp-includes/....* just sign in with your email to

lutherp40

unread,
Jun 20, 2013, 9:49:14 AM6/20/13
to digita...@googlegroups.com
It wasn't obvious to me, thus the reason I reacted the way I did.

"munging" isn't a something I know how to do.  

It also doesn't help that Google defaults to including "everything" when you reply to something when you only are referring to a particular phrase or sentence.  

In hindsight, I should NOT have responded at all.

Thank you for your feedback and I apologize to the entire group for continuing this thread well beyond its useful value.

I would be ok with the moderator deleting this entire thread.

73

Luther
KB4LHP

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 4:53:49 PM UTC-4, Joanne, W6MKU wrote:
.....It was obvious. Look at the disparity between the addresses given. I
hope nobody clicked on it. It's as likely to be a malware trap as a
spam site. I seem to remember the original had "too many recipients"
to be anything but spam, too.....
 

jdow

unread,
Jun 20, 2013, 6:57:59 PM6/20/13
to digita...@googlegroups.com, lutherp40
MUNG - MIT hacker talk for "Make Useless and No Good", or so the lore goes.
I took critical data out of the links to protect others. That's my tiny
contribution to safe compute.

{^_-}
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages