Fwd: [Pedometrics] Léa Courteille's defence on Thursday, March 6th

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Alessandro Samuel Rosa

unread,
Feb 12, 2025, 1:11:48 PM2/12/25
to

Dear pedometricians,


I am glad to announce that I will defend my thesis, whose title is "Impact of cartographic representation of uncertainty for decision-making : the case of soil quality in land-use planning" on Thursday, March 6th at 9:30 AM (Paris time, UTC+01:00), in front of the following jury:


- Christian Walter, Professor, Institut Agro Rennes-Angers - reviewer

- Christina von Haaren, Professor, Leibniz Universität Hannover - reviewer

- Véronique Bellon-Maurel, Researcher, INRAE - examiner

- Aidan Slingsby, Assistant Professor, University of London - examiner

- Philippe Lagacherie, Researcher, INRAE - thesis director

- Evelyne Lutton, Research director, INRAE - thesis co-supervisor

- Nadia Boukhelifa, Researcher, INRAE - thesis co-supervisor

- Léa Tardieu, Researcher, INRAE - thesis co-supervisor


The presentation will last approximately 45 minutes, and will be followed by around 2 hours of questions. The whole defence will be held in English.


In case you would like more information, I have included a summary of my work at the end of this email.


You are welcome to attend this event using the following link: https://institut-agro.zoom.us/j/91075909194?pwd=bf1gvzpUwOaWivqGAk9gFPutRGCSlm.1


Best regards,


Léa Courteille


_______________________



Summary:

Accurate and spatially explicit information is essential for more informed spatial planning decisions. However, this information comes with significant uncertainty which is often poorly communicated. While map producers have primarily focused on quantifying uncertainty, they have largely overlooked end-users' needs and preferences regarding its representation. As a result, users struggle to interpret and incorporate this information into their decision-making, frequently leading to its disregard.


In this thesis, we took the example of a soil quality map produced using Digital Soil Mapping techniques, and followed its entire lifecycle, from the initial spatial predictive mapping to its use in land planning decisions. Along the way, we developed and implemented specific methodologies to improve the map from an end-user’s point of view. To improve the relevance of the map for local decision making, we tried to reduce the uncertainty by increasing the size of the soil dataset used to calibrate the DSM model. To improve map integrity, we performed an uncertainty analysis that included not only the mapping errors but also the errors conveyed by the soil quality indicator. To improve the intelligibility of map uncertainty representations, we tested both spatial aggregations of predicted maps using an agglomerative clustering algorithm and an alternative visualisation technique  involving a coincident representation of uncertainty using glyphs. Ultimately, we conducted an experiment involving 283 end-users of soil maps using a web-based survey to identify their preferences regarding the representation of uncertain soil quality information, and assess the impact of map features on their decision-making. 


Our main findings were that 1) increasing the size of the calibration datasets significantly reduced the uncertainties of the DSM products involved in the production of the soil quality map, but resulted in only a moderate reduction in the uncertainty of the final soil quality map, 2) errors affecting the definition of the soil quality indicators made a small but non-negligible contribution to the overall uncertainty of the soil quality map, 3) agglomerative clustering outperformed other spatial aggregation techniques in reducing uncertainty while preserving the representation of fine soil variation, 4) end-users tend to prefer moderately aggregated map products over traditional raster DSM products and uncertainty representations by separate maps over coincident representations, 5) decision-making was significantly hindered when uncertainty values exceeded a given threshold, 6) there were clear differences in the factors influencing decision making depending on whether the decision was to authorise soil sealing or to protect against sealing. 


The findings of this thesis allowed us to formulate recommendations for soil map production that better accounts for uncertainty. We hope that these recommendations will assist map-makers in meeting end-users' needs, and that it will contribute to a more effective use of environmental maps in policy-making.


------------------
Léa Courteille
PhD student at INRAE (French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment)

UMR LISAH Centre de Montpellier (Laboratoire d'Étude des Interactions entre Sol-Agrosystème-Hydrosystème)
Bât. 24 – 2 place Pierre Viala
34060 Montpellier - France
http://www.umr-lisah.fr    

--
Década Internacional
dos Solos (2015-2024)

Alessandro Samuel-Rosa

Professor & Pesquisador
Ciência do Solo – Pedometria
www.pedometria.org

Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
Prolongamento da Rua Cerejeira, s/n, Sala E8
Bairro São Luiz
CEP 85892-000
Santa Helena, Paraná, Brasil
Telefone: +55 (45) 3268-8800
Website: www.utfpr.edu.br/santahelena

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages