Cơn lũ lụt chết người thê thảm ở Texas do Trump và Abbott gây ra
Thuan Do
The July 4–7, 2025 flash floods in Central Texas—especially along the Guadalupe River—were tragically among the deadliest floods in over a century, claiming 90+ lives, including many children at a summer camp reuters.com+13en.wikipedia.org+13cbsnews.com+13. The core of the controversy involves two main accusations: political decisions and inaction by Texas and federal leaders versus natural disaster unpredictability.
🌍 Alleged responsibility of Trump & Abbott
1. Cuts to federal weather programs
-
Critics argue that the Trump administration’s climate science and budget cuts to NOAA/NWS weakened forecasting and early warnings time.com+4houstonchronicle.com+4foxnews.com+4.
-
Trump reportedly dismissed climate change as a “hoax” and reduced staff in weather agencies by over 10% foxnews.com+5time.com+5independent.co.uk+5.
2. State-level neglect
-
Texas officials, including Governor Greg Abbott and Lt. Governor Dan Patrick, reportedly ignored long-standing warnings.
-
Between 2016–2019, local leaders decided not to install a siren-based warning system that would have cost under $1 million en.wikipedia.org+3houstonchronicle.com+3yahoo.com+3.
-
House Bill 13—proposed statewide disaster coordination—was blocked this year en.wikipedia.org+6houstonchronicle.com+6en.wikipedia.org+6.
These lapses contributed to the surprise and rapid escalation of the floods, amplifying human costs.
🧭 Counterarguments & limitations
1. Warnings were issued
-
Flood watches began July 3; flash‑flood emergency alerts were issued by early July 4 time.com+5en.wikipedia.org+5nypost.com+5nypost.com+2en.wikipedia.org+2nypost.com+2.
-
Politicians like Texas DEM Director Nim Kidd noted that forecasts underestimated rainfall rather than being absent time.com+4thefulcrum.us+4foxnews.com+4.
2. Timing of budget cuts
-
Some scholars point out that cuts weren’t active until after July 2025, casting doubt on Trump’s direct blame newsweek.com.
-
Key meteorologists and NWS employees have defended the adequacy of warnings pbs.org+15foxnews.com+15independent.co.uk+15.
🧾 Summary
| Responsibility Area | Evidence & Actions |
|---|---|
| Federal leadership | Climate denial, staffing cuts in NOAA/NWS, forsaking research axios.com |
| State/local officials | Ignored warning calls for sirens, dismissed need for warnings |
| Forecasting agencies | Issued warnings—but underestimated severity |
🧩 Bottom line
-
Yes, policy decisions—from both the Trump administration and Texas leadership—likely weakened preparedness, undercutting systems designed to prevent or mitigate such tragedies.
-
But, forecasters did issue warnings; the event's unprecedented scale still caught many off guard.
-
Accountability may lie in political decisions more than meteorological failure.
Would you like a breakdown of specific NOAA/NWS staffing cuts or a timeline of failed warning investments at the state and local levels?
